"The mind is a terrible thing to waste." Everyone knows this famous quotation, but still a countless number of people waste their potential on the path of "closed mindedness." A "closed minded" person believes everything is either in black or white, with no gray area in between. They do not allow themselves to see the possibilities of alternatives to what they presently hold as facts. To argue with a closed-minded person could be compared to arguing with a brick wall. You're not going to get very far. Closed-minded people generally do not want their outlooks changed on subjects that they hold as truth. Some examples of closed-minded people are, as follows (not true in all cases): Extremely religious people, old people, high school students, and your parents.
On the other side of the spectrum is the "open minded" person. I feel as though I have an open mind. An open mind lets things in. It's the only way. The enemy of an open mind is prejudice, and we all do it. We have to. It's automatic. We all have experiences and as we encounter new ones, our brains bring to mind past experiences and perceptions to help us deal with the situation. The problem comes when we close our minds to new information, when we base our understandings on old information and deny ourselves the opportunity to take in new information and reevaluate our views. Having an open mind is a vital part of critical thinking that allows a person to understand the world more deeply and live a healthier, more rewarding life. Even if you're determined not to change your mind about any given topic, in most cases you should not feel afraid to think about it. If you do so fairly, thinking can usually help you to strengthen your belief system. Some examples of open-minded people are, as follows (not true in all cases): Agnostics, young people, college students, and artists.
I found myself being close-minded the other night at my friend's band practice. I had never met the other band members, and was a little hesitant towards meeting them. After meeting the singer, Dave, my initial reaction was that the kid was a tool who stumbled upon the punk scene and decided to try it out for a few weeks. After blowing Dave off, I sat down and waited for the band practice to begin. A few songs into the set I realized that Dave was actually a nice guy. He danced with the kids while singing and made some real funny jokes in between songs. His appearance had completely thrown me off. His short, cropped hair and his "raver" clothes had led me to believe that he was not a person I would get along with. I have found that I judge people too much based on their appearance, a crime I have accused many people of before in the past. That night I was made a victim of my own closed-mindedness and hypocrisy.
With an open-mind, choices will be presented to you that you thought could never be possible. Religion, music, politics, your entire world could change with the help of different views on life itself. None of that would be possible with a closed mind. The closed mind is missing an entire world that it is oblivious to. So the best way to keep an open mind and still be a realist is to judge always, but set nothing in stone.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In Modesitt’s “Mindsets”, the author told stories of different situations, in which individuals will have an opinion or “mindset” made up on different matters, but would not look at the other side reasoning. The author states the mindset is “an established set of attitudes held by an individual” which often cause problems because the person starts to develop a “long – established or firmly held mindset make it impossible to see beyond one’s own assumptions and beliefs”. For example, one situation he talked about was an individual who said that “the sea leaving was raising”, but the individual said that “the people could move”. The person who stated that question about moving, never once thought if the family had enough money to move, where can they go, and among other things (Modesitt, 2014).…
- 991 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
We become closed minded to think that we are always right, refusing to be counseled. I will not lie to myself any longer.…
- 298 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Sometimes your assumptions are wrong or you close your thoughts up to other people because they aren't like you. And you should always be open to new people or new things because not everyone in the world is like you.…
- 347 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
* Polarized Thinking: Things are black or white, good or bad. You have to be perfect or you're a failure. There is no middle ground.…
- 567 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A free thinker forms their own opinions on a variety of topics such as politics and religion, regardless of what society believes. Much like the Enlightenment period, free thinkers rely heavily on scientific inquiry and logical thinking. Many authors, scientists, and researchers alike have analyzed the topic of freethinking; each developing their own opinion on whether they believe society has adopted the concept of freethinking. Sam Harris and John Stuart Mill have joined in on the debate about whether society has actually developed a true sense of freethinking. Two common themes among this debate are biological factors and societal factors, as stated in both Harris and Mill’s literature. After reading the theories that both of these authors have developed, I have determined that, no I do not believe I, nor society, has truly developed a sense of freethinking.…
- 1195 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
People do not respond to situations in the same exact way. People who grow up in the same circumstances react in different ways. That’s what makes one unique. For example, there could be two people who grew up without money. One of those people decide to use it as motivation to succeed better in life and the other can blame the world for their problem and do nothing to better themselves. Both of them started out in the same situation but grow up with different morales.…
- 454 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The confusion and Jumble that is present in the human mind is attempted to be clarified or refined through a system of dialectics. The first thing that is essential for such a system to be able to be operated is an idea, no matter how vague, pertaining to the subject. Usually the idea is shown to be flawed in some way by showing that it may be lacking completeness to it. That is it does have good points concerning some things but it does not "cover" everything. The way to make someone become aware of such flaws in their ideas, and thus force them to ultimately disagree with them, usually can be done in one of two ways. The first of these methods is make the person realize that their idea is contradictory to itself. An example of that would be when Socrates asked Cephalus if it would be just, in the context of Cephalus's definition of justice being to repay what you owe, to return weapons borrowed from a man that…
- 979 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In his book “Frames of Mind,” Dr. Howard Gardner sets out to prove the existence of multiple intelligences that he believes humans possess. One of these intelligences is what he calls personal intelligence (Gardner, 2011). Personal intelligence is a combination of intrapersonal, knowing oneself, and interpersonal, looking at others behaviors and feelings; you can not develop one intelligence without developing the other (Gardner, 2011). While Dr. Gardner does not draw conclusions on anything other than the existence of these intelligences he does bring up an argument that better describes personal intelligences. The argument states that bettering one’s personal intelligence allows one to understand themselves and their societies; this also…
- 454 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Life would surely be a lot less difficult if other people would just look at things this way or that way. That's more often than not, what we believe when things are not going well or going our way. Especially, when communication begins breaking down with people from different cultural backgrounds. We wait for the other individual to…
- 815 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Every one seems to make more sense when you put on their shoes and walk for a bit. Once you try out different mindsets you become more accepting and well rounded. People’s experiences will shape how they see things. Even if I sat down every person and listened to his or her life story I still would not understand everyone. However, I can still accept that everyone has had a completely separate experience from me. I believe everyone has a perspective and that gives people different insight into life. Viewpoints are frames in which one visualizes the reality we exist in but none of us has an unbiased perspective and each one of us much substitute perfect accuracy with multitudes of…
- 615 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I believe in open mindedness, even if you can’t see or test something it does not mean that it is not true… seeing is not always believing.…
- 778 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
People can seem different than they really are as this is shown in the short story of “This goldfish I wish” when the news reporter is not is different from the protagonist as originally thought. They ended up being very similar, and their first impressions of each other did not show this. However later in the story it is shown.…
- 657 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Perception is the way we look at things. Perception is much more than sensing; it is interpreting, processing, and reacting. The powers that have produced or trained our characteristics by instilling beliefs, values, and viewpoints which we have accepted without dispute serve as perceptual obstructions. Many people do not take into consideration others opinions without asking for them. The situations in which one is less of an individual (because of these influences) occur when they decline to comprehend someone else's opinion, or look for other points of view, because of something they have been trained to accept as truth.…
- 315 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The definition of critical thinking is a disciplined thinking that is clear, rational, open-minded, and informed by evidence: (www.dictionary.reference.com/browse/critical+thinking). There are six steps of critical thinking. 1) Remembering- how can I recall key terms, facts, or events? 2) Understanding- how can I explain this idea in my own words? 3) Applying- how can I use this idea to produce a desired result? 4) Analyzing- how can I divide this idea into parts, groups, or steps? 5) Evaluating- how can I rate the truth, usefulness, or quality of ideas and give reasons? 6) Creating- how can I invent something new based on this idea? (Six paths to more powerful thinking. 55-56. Print. 2015, 2013, and 2011) blind- I’m clear about my reasons for acting, I tend to believe that the motive justifies the method. I may unintentionally cause people upset and pain because I’m so focused on my good motive. I tend to believe that ethics is a set of universal rules that everyone must follow, just as I do. I follow the rules - everyone should. My core ethical lens would be Autonomy and Rationality. I’m rational and use my reasoning skills to determine my duties. I prefer rationality over sensibility. I tend to use reason to find the rules of life but my actions are altered do to sensibility, being flexible as I prudently follow my intuition and heart. I favor protecting the rights of individuals and are not swayed from believing that individuals should be able to do what they believe is right even if others may disagree with the results because they may not be fair to everyone else in the community. (University of Phoenix. (). Ethical Lens Inventory. Retrieved from University of Phoenix, AAIJ1DWQO6 – Foundations for University Success website, results received 2014)I myself have many personal ethics and they influences my decisions greatly. But it does depend on what subject we are referring to. There is no universal ethic for everything. In…
- 821 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
As a general rule, critical thinking involves developing some emotional and intellectual distance between yourself and ideas whether you’re own or others in order to better evaluate their truth, validity, and reasonableness. Critical thinking is an effort to develop reliable, rational evaluations about what is reasonable for us to believe and disbelieve. Critical thinking makes use of the tools of logic and science because it values skepticism over gullibility or dogmatism, reason over faith, science of pseudoscience, and rationality over wishful thinking. Critical thinking does not guarantee that we will arrive at truth, but it does make it much more likely than any of the alternatives do.…
- 764 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays