Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

comparison between the Han and Roman empire

Good Essays
473 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
comparison between the Han and Roman empire
Powerful empires throughout history have differed and been similar in the techniques they used to rule. Specifically Han China(25c.e-220c.e) and Imperial Rome(245 c.d-476 c.e0, They both traded through the silk road, the Han had a strong centralized government while the Romans operated with a decentralized structure, and lastly the Han attempted diplomatic solutions when it came to military matters while Rome had a far more aggressive reputation when dealing with enemies. Han China and imperial Rome where both around when the silk road flourished and being the two largest empires of the time period they where the most active pit stops for merchants of many kinds. The most common products leaving china where silk thus the name, horses, Chinese medicine, and paper. Although many not as expensive or rare in East Asia they where very highly valued by Europeans. Romans using the same technique vise versa exported gold, ivory, and glass. Both empires through the silk road where able to have a flowing income of wealth and what they considered to be luxurious possessions. Now in terms of government stratification The Han and Romans where complete opposites. The romans had a decentralized government, which was divided, into two parts by Diocletian. Although some may argue that it was simply a step closer to its fall, The Han came to prove otherwise; reason being they always had a strong centralized government, which also failed to keep them in power. In ruling terms there was two choices a or b and neither proved to be the key to never ending power. Finally, is the difference in their methods of dealing with intruders; the Hans north border was constantly raided by the Xiongnu, nomadic people north of China, they were very skilled horsemen and being nomads they had successful raids against Chinese settlers and before military power could reach the affected areas they had dispersed and couldn’t be fought so they attempted peace through other means. They tried a diplomatic solution, they where willing to give women, food and supplies instead of having them taking them themselves. Despite the efforts little success was achieved. Similar situation differently deal with, the romans had Germanic tribes attack them because of their many accumulated riches. They fought them in many occasions but because of the new ruling religion, Christianity, many romans where now reluctant to join the army so more than often mercenaries where hired to fight their battles. Strategies from both sides proved to be ineffective but the romans’ unwillingness to fight eventually led to the empires crumble.
In a blunt synopsis, both imperial Rome and Han China had periods of great power achieved through some similar some different techniques. But their inability to adapt to the circumstances posed to them as they developed and grew limited their period of rule.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both Han China and Imperial Rome used a centralized government with roads to help them rule their large empire, yet Han China had Confucianism to legitimize their rule while Roman emperors were dependent on the support of a large military force for legitimacy from 204 B.C.E to 476 C.E.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas Han China from 206 B.C.E. to 220 B.C.E. and the imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E. had shared similarities on the territorial boundaries issues, the two empires had different political over the huge amount of land. Known as most powerful empires in history, Han China and Rome utilized idiosyncractic policy to maintain the sovereignty. However, the two states both suffered from the border disputes.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were different politically. The Roman Empire was founded on imported agriculture and didn’t have a set bureaucracy. While the emperor of Rome appointed some advisors the government lacked many institutions, such as a planned budget. Apart from the emperor and senate the Romans didn’t have other levels of government; because of this the farther reaches of the Roman Empire had more autonomy. The Han was founded on strict legalism and had a well organized bureaucracy. Even though the emperor had absolute power, institutions such as the Three Councilors of State and Nine…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In late B.C.E and early C.E many empires rose and thrived. While these empires all desired to conquer and become the strongest, they had other things in common. In Han China, a long lasting empire from 206 B.C.E to 220 C.E, the leadership was similar to the leadership of Imperial Rome, an empire from 31 B.C.E to 476 C.E. Both empires were lead by an emperor, who was the sole lawmaker for the empire, the over thrower of the previous leader and impact on many other aspects of the region. However, these two empires differed in their religious ways. In the Roman Empire, the government had a state sponsored religion and emperors participated in the organization of it. Contrary to Imperial Rome, Han China’s emperors were much less concerned with religion; instead they followed the Confucian ideology in their government. These two…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman and Han Empires were the most powerful empires among the Classical Empires. Between the fifth century B.C.E. and the fifth century C.E., the Roman empire of the Mediterranean and the Han Empire of China were both influential powers of the Classical Asian and Mediterranean worlds. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were similar in their falls because they both fell to nomadic invaders, and because they both fell because of a decline in economic trade. The Han and the Roman Empires were different in their falls because the Han suffered from serious revolts whereas the Romans did not; also the effects of their falls were different because China was able to make a fairly quick comeback whereas Rome was never able to do so.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both empires had problems with social in takes. The Han Dynasty had problems with taxations, peasants grew angry over the raise of taxes and revolved against china so they used the military to stop them but soon needed more soldiers so, the Han government forced many farmers and others to fight as well, generating a large group of angry citizens. The Romans struggled with religion more than taxes as Christianity spread through Rome officials…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China are both well recognized empires, known as strong and fairly successful. Although the empires had some differences they also had similarities in their methods of political control. Similarities between these empires include the belief that leaders had connections to God, religious tolerance, and public works provided to citizens. Along with the similarities in political control the differences include Rome having a democracy while China had a centralized bureaucracy, Rome had lesser domestic repercussions while China had harsh punishments, and Rome offered assimilation to become a citizen while China did not need to offer assimilation because it conquered states that were already chinese.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were very common in the aspect of their downfall and collapse. Han China had a well-organized bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideas and education. In addition, they also had emphasis on family ancestors (patriarchal), reliance on landed gentry, and accomplishments in engineering; which includes roads, canals, and the Great Wall. The Roman Empire contained a well-organized bureaucracy as well which was founded on Roman law and classical learning. They also implied emphasis on family (pater familias), had reliance on patricians, and had engineering accomplishments; including roads, aqueducts, amphitheaters, domes, sewage systems, and central heating. Although, unfortunately the two become even more common…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Han and the Romans both had very passive views when it came to technology, both sharing the "good is good enough" mindset. This appears through people of high class wanting higher quality materials and laborers, the Han enjoying a superb invention but not outwardly seeking to improve it, as well as the Romans appreciated fantastic inventions without searching for ways to improve…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the empires lasted during the same time, they were located on completely different land areas. Rome had the Mediterranean, was hilly, with lots of rivers. Natural protections with their central location, and able to utilize their manpower resources of Italy. While Han China had rivers, plateau, deserts, mountains, was plain-fertile but needed…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From 206 B.C.E. - 220 C.E., the Han dynasty, in China, accumulated many political control methods, as did Imperial Rome reigning from 31 B.C.E. – 476 C.E. However, there were more differences than similarities between the two empires/dynasties. Two main differences were China and Rome’s territorial expansion and their political philosophies (mandate of heaven and monarchy). A similarity between these two empires would be their centralized government adopting bureaucracy.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay #1-Compare and Contrast the Han and Roman Empires in terms of their technological achievements…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Han China and Imperial Rome had a political system structure consisting of a sovereign emperor who made executive, almost dictator-like, decisions and directed the affairs of the empire. However, in both empires, emperors relied on regional governors to regulated affairs in their respective regions due to the fact that both empires were so massive and consisted of an enormous population.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two of the greatest empires in all of history, the Ancient Roman and the Han China empires are similar in terms of both creating great inventions still used today; however, they are different in terms of how their militaries were organized and their religious beliefs.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the classical period, influential empires such as Imperial Rome and the Han Dynasty emerged exhibiting numerous resemblances, due to cultural diffusion, as well as various distinctions from each other regarding political control. Methods of transportation and communication benefited the government by linking and unifying crucial parts of both empires. Both empires had a system of roads that facilitated communication, trade, economic activity, and the movement of military. Although both empires possessed a well-organized bureaucracy, the Han Dynasty’s bureaucracy was less complex and was based upon Confucian ideas and education whereas the Roman Empire’s bureaucracy was founded on Roman law and classical learning. Both the Han Dynasty…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays