Preview

Comparison Of Napoleon And Hitler

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2498 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparison Of Napoleon And Hitler
The world as we know it has seen the likes of the most feared and infamous dictators and military geniuses. Some of these people have even shaped the way the world is today and their influences are still felt. Among such dictators are Napoleon Bonaparte and Adolf Hitler, leaders of France and Germany respectively at two different periods. Adolf Hitler's reign of power begins in 1933 when he is appointed Chancellor of Germany and his reign ends with his suicidal death on April 30 1945. Napoleon Bonaparte's reign of military power begins in 1783 until he resigns in 1814, yet he has a slight military rebirth after that but it only lasts for a very short time. Both leaders' careers are filled with massive successes yet they are also littered with massive defeats that truly change the way the world is today. Although these leaders can be considered geniuses, it does not mean they are perfect and not susceptible to the pull of human nature. Adolf Hitler and Napoleon Bonaparte are two of the foremost military strategists and totalitarian leaders yet both had lapses in their judgment, both exhibit episodes of cowardice and both fail in their battles with Russia, ultimately ending their reigns.

Adolf Hitler and Napoleon Bonaparte both have several lapses in judgment on the battlefield, and in the planning rooms, during their reigns. While these lapses in judgment immediately may not result in the defeat of an army, when they are added together the results can and often were disastrous. Though Hitler had a strong army that could fight well, the mismanagement of that army and the people around it eventually lead to his personal demise as well as his army's demise. Napoleon too is responsible for making several irresponsible and debilitating decisions during his reign.

The Rhineland, a buffer zone between France and Germany that was formed at the end of World War I in the treaty of Versailles, is a very sensitive area that cannot be occupied by any German military forces.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hitler and Stalin are names that will be forever remember as evil master minds of killing millions of people in order to create a perfect race. In this paper, there will be a comparison of Hitler and Stalin’s careers. Also, investigating which one had a greater impact on the twentieth century.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of those leaders was Adolf Hitler. Adolf Hitler was a dictator who wanted to rule the world without the Jews. Some of his strengths were that he was a very powerful leader, he had managed to build a strong army, he managed to battle strong enemies, and he was able to make a successful headquarters. Sadly, some of his disadvantages led to his destruction. One reason is he was arrogant with his generals. He considered himself to be a military genius and did not listen to his generals. When he failed on something, Adolf blamed it on his…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The philosophies behind the appeasement as the solution to peace were littered with faults which Germany capitalized on. In the wake of World War One the great powers established the Rhineland demilitarized zone, as part of the Treaty of Versailles. The demilitarized zone worked as a collective security as a buffer between Germany and France to lessen the tension between the historically rival nations who fought over this piece of land. Hitler had said that the Rhineland was German land and believed he had the right to reoccupy it. “Berlin, March 7 [1936] – Germany today cast off the last shackles fastened upon her by the Treaty of Versailles when Adolf Hitler, as commander-in-chief of the Reich defense forces, sent his new battalions into the Rhineland’s demilitarized zone (Document 3) .” When Hitler reoccupied the Rhineland in clear defiance of Treaty of Versailles France’s immediate response was a call to the other powers to pressure the German government into removing its soldiers from the demilitarized zone but because of the…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He found it difficult to be innovative and inventive in warfare, and was not receptive to new ideas or strategies. Over his tenure as leader of the army, he also failed to introduce new training methods, and often made judgement errors, including underestimating the amount of supplies that would be needed. Napoleon also found it difficult to accept advice from others who knew better, and often failed to inform his senior officers of what he was planning to do on campaign, and insisted on maintaining all of the power, so they weren’t able to make any of the decisions. In his earlier campaigns, this had been less of an issue, as his armies were often small, but when leading armies of hundreds of thousands of men it was almost impossible for him to maintain control over the entirety of the decisions that needed to be…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler Vs. Stalin

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the time of World War II period in the 1900s, two rulers from two great nations rose to power. They are Hitler from the Nazi Germany and Stalin from the Soviet Union. Both of the two leaders share some similarities in their rule, for example they had total control of their countries. However, there are few differences between them as well. By examining the historical events, we can see that how Hitler and Stalin led Germany and Soviet Union to the top of world stage.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ruler is one of the most important parts of a country. They can cause gain or loss for the people, and sometimes even a mixture of both. An exemplary leader can bring great change to a nation, and there are many who have caused incredible reforms. For example, Abraham Lincoln abolished slavery in the United States, and King Louis XVIII of France inadvertently caused a revolution. Though Louis may be well known, the most famous of France’s rulers was arguably Napoleon. His military success and determination led to a huge amount of power within his French Empire, but ultimately a great fall. The entire nation of France was able to appreciate Napoleon and give him perhaps more credit than he is due; they saw him as a beacon of hope. Much of Napoleon’s rule consisted of extreme changes to France’s society and church, but other areas, such as education, individual rights, and government, were hardly affected.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adolf Hitler and Winston Churchill were leaders of two very different countries. Hitler was the overseer of Germany, while Churchill was the Prime Minister of Britain. These two rulers were on different sides of World War Two. Because of this, Hitler and Churchill had different views about political ideologies, treatment of their citizens, and goals they wanted to achieve.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    and his family by accusing him of treason with other crimes. Followed by the “Reign of Terror”, French was becoming and unsafe state that everyone could be executed by the guillotine. During this Reign, there were 2 percent of French citizens were killed, it is about 40 thousand including monarchy, loyal family, nobility and the related family. Respect to Napoleon, as slowly to restore the order and save the revolution, Napoleon Bonaparte got tremendous support from the France citizens. Napoleon latter was crowned as an emperor of France due to his outstanding conquered many states in Europe continent.…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hitler and Napoleon are arguably two of the most influential and powerful leaders in the history of mankind. They both had their times of glory, but both also had a very ugly side. At the end of this essay, I will compare and contrast the two, but before I can do that, we need to have a little background on them.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Napoleon Bonaparte a hero or a tyrant? Did the good of his actions outweigh the bad? Napoleon Bonaparte was a French military leader who rose to power during the French Revolution. He eventually conquered most of Europe and named himself emperor. I believe that Napoleon was a tyrant for a few different reasons. These include that he was egotistical, selfish, and untruthful.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Revered by few, despised by many, and known by all, two of the most arguably world-renowned authoritarians consisted of a paranoid Russian tyrant and a ruthless German dictator who both led their countries with iron fists. Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler have written themselves into the world's history through their actions in the gruesome, looming beast that was World War II, of the treatment of their nations, and of the governments they represented. In theory, these two leaders piloted their nations quite similarly, but although both Stalin and Hitler have become known as famous and powerful dictators with analogous aspirations, their individual policies of ruling were actually strikingly different.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is it that brings all dictators together in comparison? Is it their ruthless actions towards others? Could it be their thirst for power? Or maybe it's the fact that all dictators use others to gain for themselves. "He [Napoleon] would only be too happy to let you make your decisions by yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where would we be?" (Orwell page 50). These examples prove Napoleon, ruler of Animal Farm, and Pol Pot, ruler of Cambodia, are indeed similar.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wendell Willkie, the Republican Presidential candidate in 1940, once said, “It is from weakness that people reach for dictators and concentrated government power.” In Germany, Italy, and Japan, the awful economic, political, and racial conditions leading up to World War II gave rise to three of the modern world’s fiercest dictators. Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Hideki Tojo have gone down in history for all the wrong reasons, and they will forever be remembered for the dark stain they have left on history. Adolf Hitler, possibly the most infamous of dictators, is one of the most known figures in history. Before Hitler came to power, Germany was in the midst of an economic depression, still trying to find money to pay its war reparations after losing World War I (Hitler, 1).…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler and Stalin

    • 427 Words
    • 1 Page

    One of the most famous men for using his power for evil is Adolf Hitler. Everyone today knows all of the hatred and diversions he brought to the world. Hitler had a dream and this dream was to have one race with blue eyes and blonde hair. Of course not everyone in the world had those features so his big plan was to annihilate everyone who was different or stood in the way of him conquering his dream. Hitler’s rise to power did not take long. Hitler was very charismatic and had many followers. Like today how actors and stars sometimes act out just to get noticed Hitler started many protests and little up-roars in streets when he began to get involved in parties and groups and that’s how Hitler came to be noticed. Just like Joseph Stalin, Hitler came into power at a time of high instability in their countries and they both took advantage of it to gain political support for their totalitarian causes. Hitler was intrigued by Marxism while Stalin was fascinated with Fascism. Hitler like Stalin made use of an elite body guard named The Joseph Stalin and Hitler both sought to blame other people for the problems that were playing in their countries at the time. For Hitler it was the Jews and for Stalin he saw capitalism as a great enemy. Like Hitler, Stalin ruled with an iron fist and used terrorism to enforce his will on people. Hitler and Stalin were both skillful in many areas but their best was propaganda. They could twist their words and manipulate people into believing what they had to say. Hitler made many speeches, but the one that proved he used propaganda was his final speech he gave before his treason. Stalin on the other hand was able to hide his manipulative skills better but in his speech to the Fifteenth Congress in 1927 it had many lies within it. The success of these two men was mostly attributed to their politics and new ideas.In conclusion, Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler had many similarities in their rise to power. To me the things that stood out the…

    • 427 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Second World War, Hitler rose to power and fame utilizing each opportunity to his advantage and eventually he gained personal success. He was a puny and un-educated villager. He scaled great heights not because of his character, but because he was an opportunist. Strike when the iron is hot, not keep striking until you can finally dent it.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays