Preview

Hitler And Stalin Comparison

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
665 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hitler And Stalin Comparison
Revered by few, despised by many, and known by all, two of the most arguably world-renowned authoritarians consisted of a paranoid Russian tyrant and a ruthless German dictator who both led their countries with iron fists. Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler have written themselves into the world's history through their actions in the gruesome, looming beast that was World War II, of the treatment of their nations, and of the governments they represented. In theory, these two leaders piloted their nations quite similarly, but although both Stalin and Hitler have become known as famous and powerful dictators with analogous aspirations, their individual policies of ruling were actually strikingly different.
Indeed, both Stalin and Hitler had both
…show more content…
For example, Hitler is infamously known for the phenomenal speeches he would deliver to his audiences; his words could turn the crowd into a bellowing lion with claws ready to strike at any foe who dared to oppose his word. Though he did hold on to the country through the threat of elimination with a hard grip, he built a faithful base of followers and encouraged the nation to see him as a savior. On the other hand, Stalin is renowned for his morbid, panic-induced purges during which he would eliminate swathes of people whom he feared were a threat to his rule, encouraging citizens to spy on each other and killing millions. He was also notorious for rewriting history books and, ideally, erasing opponents from history (History.com).
In brief, both Hitler and Stalin had similar ambitions and ways of attaining power in their respective nations while retaining predominantly differing aspects of their individual beliefs and government functions. This preliminary essay only scratches the surface of the ocean of differences between the two leaders; however, without a doubt, there are many more aspects to the two rulers that differ them than there are that make them out to be similar, chiefly through their economic policies and methods of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hitler and Stalin are names that will be forever remember as evil master minds of killing millions of people in order to create a perfect race. In this paper, there will be a comparison of Hitler and Stalin’s careers. Also, investigating which one had a greater impact on the twentieth century.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If one was alive and young back at the time of the second great war, which country would one choose to live in? Italy or Russia? Germany or Britain? United States or Japan? It honestly depended on the leaders. During the years of World War 2, there were many leaders; such as Roosevelt, Churchill, Hitler, and the two that were alike in many ways, but were also different are Benito Mussolini and Joseph Stalin. These two were Dictators who ruled over two different countries Mussolini ruled Italy, and Stalin ruled Russia. What did they stand for, did they treated their citizens differently, and what goals did they have? All of these questions will be answered in the following paragraphs, where you can easily tell the differences…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: J. Barros & R. Gregor. Double Deception: Stalin, Hitler, and the Invasion of Russia. Chicago: Northern Illinois University Press, 1995.…

    • 2524 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin were two of the most evil men in history, responsible for countless atrocities. They had many similarities as well. Both men committed genocide to further their political agenda, massively improved the militaries of their respective countries, had their own different groups of secret police and spies, and finally they were both tyrannical totalitarian dictators. Despite sharing many similarities, their government structure and political philosophies were very different. Adolf Hitler was a Fascist who believed in a highly centralized government with himself at the top of the pyramid. Joseph Stalin was a communist who believed in collectivism and instilling fear into his political opposition. Although there are…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler commands the Germans to invade the Soviet Union in 1941 – this was Hitler’s greatest mistake, but was luck on the Soviets side or was it all just the leader Stalin’s good tactics and leadership? Even though Stalin was a mass murderer and a ruthless leader, he did one thing right. After the Soviets were losing battle after battle Stalin let his commanders fight the war as they knew it, did not interfere with their plan and stuck to his word, unlike Hitler did. Stalin let his commanders be true commanders and did not use them as puppets or for his own use. He was a true leader stuck to his word which is why I think the he was successful at leading his nation to victory. As the war continued the number of errors that Stalin was making got…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Hitler and Stalin both employed a special police force to help control the country under their totalitarian rule, Hitler’s force relied on having secret police everywhere while Stalin relied on having individuals report their friends and coworkers. To control citizens by spying on them and imprisoning them, Hitler employed the use of the Himmler’s SS and the Gestapo political police. The SS initially started off as Hitler’s personal bodyguards, but under Himmler’s command, they evolved into a more powerful force, who were eventually responsible for the Final Solution. The Gestapo, while somewhat similar to the SS, were Hitler’s secret police, who focused on taking down any opposing political opponents, primarily those who went underground after the creation of the one party system in Germany. The Gestapo were responsible for the capture and imprisonment of most opposing political leaders in Nazi Germany. According to the book on Germany, “Denouncers and…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler Vs. Stalin

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the time of World War II period in the 1900s, two rulers from two great nations rose to power. They are Hitler from the Nazi Germany and Stalin from the Soviet Union. Both of the two leaders share some similarities in their rule, for example they had total control of their countries. However, there are few differences between them as well. By examining the historical events, we can see that how Hitler and Stalin led Germany and Soviet Union to the top of world stage.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite being on opposing sides during World War II, the governments of the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany had many similarities. The two regimes were infamous for their corrupt militaristic governments and their use of propaganda and censorship to secure the loyalty and cooperation of their citizens. Most importantly, the policies towards minorities in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia were the cause of mass violence and millions of deaths. Even though these two regimes had much in common, the differences lie within the similarities. Many ideals of the two parties were conflicting, ultimately resulting in war between them.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benito Mussolini was given power to take charge of the government because he was the best hope for the dynasty at the time for Italy. As soon as he was the leader, he abolished democracy and outlawed all political parties except the Fascists. He maintained power by creating the secret police, imposed censorship and travel restrictions, and kept close control of the economy. Joseph Stalin became the leader of the Soviet Union in 1929 because they were experiencing multiple revolutions and a civil war. He became a communist dictator; private farms were eliminated in favor of collective farms, millions of peasants were killed on his order, and he secured the Soviet control of the countryside. He maintained power by using interrogation and murder to intimidate his enemies and the general public. Adolf Hitler was a politician who volunteered for the German Army in World War I and was twice awarded the Iron Cross, a medal for bravery. The German brand of fascism was known as Nazism, it was supported by people in the middle and lower classes. Soon Hitler’s success as an organizer and speaker led him to be the leader of the Nazi party. Very quickly the Nazi’s became the largest political party. Hitler acted quickly to strengthen his position; his methods of control were fear and intimidation. He banned unions and other political parties, conducted secret trials, and persecuted enemies. He made anti-Semitism an official policy (blamed Jews for all of Germany’s problems) and made clear the Germans were the master race, “Aryans”. The rise of totalitarian dictators was one of the supreme changes in the history of the world since the…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since the beginning of the world, there has been an ongoing cycle of tyrannical leaders that have ruled their lands with an evil hand. Since the beginning of the twentieth century we have seen perhaps the deadliest dictators of them all. Stalin's regime in the 1930's and 1940's in the Soviet Union and Saddam's regime in the present day Iraq share an exceptionally strong similarity.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hitler. Stalin. Mussolini. These three names define World War II. World policy revolved around them for at least a decade or in Stalin 's case for almost fifty years. Much is generally known about each man 's role in the war, but only as it pertains to the outcome. Not many people possess extensive knowledge of these dictators as individuals or as leaders of a particular party. This paper will attempt to shed light on the differences as well as the similarities of they style of totalitarianism that the three men who shaped the middle of the twentieth century implemented in their respective countries.…

    • 3072 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Khrushchev’s vilification of Stalin in his address to the Twentieth Party Congress was meticulous in detailing precise failures of his predecessor’s rule. Above all, Khrushchev strongly elaborated on Stalin’s extremities, especially the cult of personality that he had built up over the years. The speech also in turn attacked ‘Stalinist repressions, arrests, terror and murders…[and] for bungling foreign affairs and mishandling the war’. Despite this, Khrushchev was cautious in limiting his other criticisms of Stalin, and it was this focus on him as an individual rather than of the overall Soviet system that defined the boundaries of acceptable criticism. As such, the speech sought to condemn Stalin without endangering the party’s validity or the system that had indeed allowed Khrushchev to rise to power.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The end result was a combination of the resurgence of authoritarian rule coupled with a new type of cruel and active tyranny which reached its peak in Nazi Germany and the Stalinist Soviet Union. It was Hitler’s aggression toward Poland that triggered World War II. The horrors of this time period are a disturbing chapter in history, which many would like to believe were an aberration and will not happen again. One would do well to learn the lessons of history, lest they be repeated in our own day. Such authoritarian governments did not have modern technology or means of communication, and as a result did not have the capacity to control many aspects of the lives of their citizens; however they apparently had no desire to do so, as they were preoccupied with their own survival.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The history of the 20th century can be defined by the biographies of six men: Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, Vladimir Lenin, Adolf Hitler, Mao Tse Tung, and Josef Stalin. Each of these men had a lasting significant involvement in world affairs. This essay will focus on the significance each individual had on the ideologies of Democracy and Totalitarianism. Four of the six individuals were leaders of a totalitarianistic state, and three of these led a communist country. Also four of the six leaders were in power during the Second World War. The profiles of these six men formed the world that we live in today.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1984 Panopticism

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hitler and Stalin are two men who forever left an imprint on the history and future of mankind. The 1940’s are a decade with hundreds of twist and turns, and these two men can be named responsible for the majority of them. The respective countries of these two rulers both experienced a time where citizens ultimately had almost no rights and no freedom because of the choice of government these two rulers decided to practice: Totalitarianism. Totalitarianism left people’s rights behind and just focused on power and control of the party in charge. It developed from a theory on a way of controlling people, Panopticism, and was tweaked and modified by the two rulers because of its intenseness to make it suitable for their countries. Because of this still extreme way of governing, it brought along with it many critics and literature pieces written about its extremist qualities. One of the most famous of these authors is George Orwell, who draws from Hitler and Stalin’s government to try and construct an even extremer type of rule that would be a perfect panoptic society in his novel 1984. However, due to the holes in the structure of his created society in 1984, George Orwell fails to represent a perfect state of panopticism.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays