This terminology displayed no respect to the complex nature and relationship of the Trinity. Shamblin tried to defend her view with Scripture referencing Jesus as the Son of God and paired these passages with the logic that the Son cannot also be the Father. She continued to quote Luke 22:42, and other parasynoptic passages, to show that Jesus clearly is not God because he spoke to the Father. She also used this passage to state that Christ does not have the same power and deity as God because he submits to his will. Shamblin completely ignored many scripture references which teach the Trinity, and she twisted some that do in order to further her ideology. She referenced John 10, and even later quoted verses 31 through 35. She conveniently left out verse 31 where Jesus says, “I and the
This terminology displayed no respect to the complex nature and relationship of the Trinity. Shamblin tried to defend her view with Scripture referencing Jesus as the Son of God and paired these passages with the logic that the Son cannot also be the Father. She continued to quote Luke 22:42, and other parasynoptic passages, to show that Jesus clearly is not God because he spoke to the Father. She also used this passage to state that Christ does not have the same power and deity as God because he submits to his will. Shamblin completely ignored many scripture references which teach the Trinity, and she twisted some that do in order to further her ideology. She referenced John 10, and even later quoted verses 31 through 35. She conveniently left out verse 31 where Jesus says, “I and the