Preview

Conflict Escalation: Five Phase Model

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1197 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conflict Escalation: Five Phase Model
Maya believed that delivery system needs to be improved first since customers complained about that. She understood that customer’s satisfaction is of vital importance for the company’s existence. Since they could not come to an agreement, they decide to schedule another meeting and try again. During the 4th meeting they kept trying to persuade each other unsuccessfully and left the meeting without getting to an agreement. They were both angry and unhappy. They both experienced value conflict; each had different goals in mind when assessing the problem and different criteria when they assessed the performance.
After that meeting they started avoiding each other, all communication was done through emails. During that time they also started creating
…show more content…
To remain credible and to restrain the enemy from an act of force, the threatened party feels compelled to commit acts of force itself. This, in turn, proves to the threatening party the aggressive nature of the threatened and provokes counterforce and further escalation. This process continues until the parties reach financial or physical exhaustion, or the matter is decided in the courtroom.” (Conflict Escalation: Five Phase Model).
Relationship and Emotion
Relationship consists of a set of expectations about self and other, our actions and meanings are organized and they match. Coordination does not mean that all parties have the same understanding. Relationship can be good even if the parties could understand what happing different ways is. Those types of interactions are symmetrical, which we have in case of Maya and Jan. They respond to each other in the similar way, both competitive. There is another type of interaction, complementary interaction which occurs if two partners respond to each other in coordinated way, for example if Jan has proposed changes to ordering department and Maya would agree with him.
“People typically think that emotions are reactions beyond their control.
…show more content…
(Chapter 6)
Our emotions are based on rules which we learned growing up, by being part of the certain society or certain family. Therefore we do not have experience same emotions in the same situations. We could also say that behavior and emotions that both Jan and Maya experienced were connected to the behavior which was expected in this situation in this organization. They were anger and they action symmetrical, they needed someone to help them through the process.
Mediation
“Mediation is essentially facilitated negotiation. It is a process in which a neutral third party helps guide a discussion between disputants about issues between them.
In mediation, a third party facilitates a negotiation process between parties who are experiencing conflict. It is an attempt to help parties whose differences are residing in the spheres of challenge or harm move to the sphere of value.” (ADR process)
Mediator is third party, a neutral third party that leads all parties to reach agreement beneficial for all. In this case the mediator was Human Resource department which engaged to help Maya and Jan resolve the conflict. Human
Resource had a set of few steps that they needed to do in order for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mgt441 Assignment 4

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Third-party involvement includes mediation, fact-finding, and arbitration”(Fossum, 2015, p.409). Mediation is a party that assists the involved party however remains neutral. Mediation will find a common ground where the parties involved can communicate together in order to find a solution to whatever problem or task is at hand. However easy this may sound the task of bringing a disruptive party together can seem next to impossible. The goal for the mediator is to bring not only communication to the table but also an agreement.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The role of the Mediator will be that of a neutral third party, who will have no long-term interest in the consequences or outcome of the dispute. His or her role will be that of a facilitator and advisor in the settlement negotiations. The Mediator may comment on issues and express his or her opinion regarding the relative strength or weakness of the parties’ positions.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another strategies of resolutions through in the ADR process in the situation of problems in the Learning Team is the mediation. Team member with current or previous involvement in disputes are not able to intervene as arbitrator. According to "San Diego Court” (2014), Mediation is a confidential, non-binding process in which a trained mediator facilitates communication between disputants and assists parties in reaching a mutually acceptable resolution of all or part of their dispute. The mediator is not the decision-maker and does not resolve the dispute, the parties do. However a mediator is often able to more fully explore the parties' underlying interests, needs and priorities ("San Diego Court ", 2014). The ADR Clause is a faster process and more effective that a litigation.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Psych 100B Studyguide

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Robert Zajonc: Emotions need no inferences; We can have emotional reactions apart from (and even before) we interpret a situation.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mediation is defined as an informal, non-binding process where a neutral party helps two other parties’ cone to a mutual resolution where sometimes these conflicts seem impossible to reach when it is left to only both parties (Masucci, 2003).…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ultimate goal of the mediator is to assist two or more feuding individuals by helping them reach an agreement; they often facilitate communication between feuding parties in order to reach common ground in a timely fashion. While the mediator does help assist the two parties resolve conflict, the mediator is not the decision maker. Ultimately, the conflict will be resolved by the two feuding parties and not the mediator Worldwide Legal Directories, 2010).…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mediation requires a neutral and knowledgeable third party to meet with the parties involved, gather the pertinent facts and then help the parties reach a mutually agreed settlement (Cheeseman 2010). Further, Morel notes that Mediation successfully resolves disputes 90…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mediation is also an informal alternative to litigation. Mediators are individuals trained in negotiations, who bring opposing parties together and attempt to work out a settlement or agreement that both parties accept or reject. Mediation is used for a wide gamut of case-types ranging from juvenile felonies to federal government negotiations with Native American Indian tribes. Mediation has also become a significant method for resolving disputes between investors and their stock brokers.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the event a dispute shall arise between members of a learning team, the members agree to participate in a mediated negotiation with the assistance of a neutral person who will be appointed by the remaining members of the learning team. The mediation will involve each side of dispute communicating with an impartial person, to attempt to reach a voluntary agreement. Mediation involves no formal procedures and the mediator does not have the power to render a binding decision or force parties to agree. The team members which are involve in the dispute will not be forced to participate in the mediation process.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A mediator is a neutral go-between who convenes with two or more people or parties to smooth the progress and help with communicating in order to agree about a matter or close over a difference that is present between the two people or parties. The mediator does not decide the matter, a mediator makes recommendations. The mediator is present to assist in deciding the problem that is the basis of the disagreement involving both parties. The ultimate decision is made when the two parties finally agree on the issue. The lawful and ethical role of the mediator is to maintain all of the communications, keeping them private, secure and confidential.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A mediator is an impartial third party who meets with two or more people to encourage and facilitate communication in order to reach an agreement or conclusion over a conflict that exists between the two parties. The mediator is not the decision maker. The two parties and not the mediator will make the final decision. It is the legal and ethical job of the mediator to keep all communication confidential unless otherwise specified (The Association of Attorney-Mediators, 2001).…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psyc 312

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Neutral mediators often help solve labor disputes, legal battles, and divorce proceedings. Mediators are often in a better position to recognize that there are mutually agreeable solutions to a conflict…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The mediator uses empathy, congruency and unconditional positive regard. Both people have to work together in the process to see how to work out their own disputes rather than always letting the mediator settle it out for them…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation Process

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mediation is a process where both parties can present their positions, provide information, and express their request for relief. If the parties reach an agreement then it is binding.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leaving the 20st century far behind, people will soon have to realize that the era of cheap fossil fuel is ending. Developed countries, U.S.A. on the front page has all the data and scientific works about ‘Peak Oil’ proving the desperate situation of the world.[1] Basically, humankind should immediately stop producing and consuming oil following the curve( figure-1). Past hundred years of consuming the curve was going upwards; however the optimistic estimates show that latest in 2020, the earth will arise the top quantity of its source of oil and then the annual production curve is going to slope down; One year ago, in a report commissioned by the U.S. Department of Energy, Robert L. Hirsch challenged the notion that the free market can solve the onrushing emergency: "The world has never faced a problem like Peak Oil. Without massive mitigation more than a decade before the fact, the problem will be pervasive and will not be temporary. Previous energy transitions (wood to coal and coal to oil) were gradual and evolutionary; oil peaking will be abrupt and revolutionary." (Izquierdo)[2] Since this is the very optimistic time estimation, people need to be informed about all of the worst scenarios of living conditions that they will be able to able to provide for themselves and also their children. As the 21st century designers, we also have to get enough knowledge to take advantage of the wind, solar and tidal power instead of using oil and natural gas to produce electricity.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays