Preview

Conformity Of The Jury System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1103 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conformity Of The Jury System
Introduction
Jury system is originated in Ancient Rome, the 12 jurors had to be good male Roman citizen. Females, children, the elderly and slaves were excluding in jury system. The duty of jury was to investigate crime and judge the accused people. It symbolized a high level of democracy which involved citizen in the legal system and transparency of judicial power. Australia today still continuous the jury system in the district court and supreme court. The selection of jury is changed, women now can be selected as the male register voters. The duty of jury is to hear and determine the serious crime and civil matters involving large monetary claims ( New South Wales Government, 2017). Based on the argument juries are a costly, inappropriate
…show more content…
People’s decision may influence by group of people. There are four factors may have influenced the likelihood to conform to the group: group size, unanimity, confidence and self-esteem. (P120-121, Crane& Hannibal, 2012) In Asch’s study with three confederates, 32 pre-cent of participants conformed other’s decisions or behaviour. Only in very large group size can decrease the level of conformity which the number of jurors is not qualified due to the 12 or 15 people. Ash’s research also shows people are easy to conform with the majority’s decision, only when there is one person strongly disagreed, then the results will be significantly changed. Therefore, every jury must have the great encourage to speak out his or her idea even it may different with majority. The confidence of himself or herself plays an important role to avoid group conformity. Perrin and Spencer found the conformity rates in engineers and medical student were almost zero during the replicate Ash’s experiment. It is not means only well-educated people have confidence, but mostly likely, the confident people who believe themselves are well-educated. However, the jurors’ educated level or the confidence level is not examined. Stang also found if the person who has high self-esteem, he or she will less likely to the conform the incorrect response. The level of self-esteem in every juror may different, there is high probability that the low-self-esteem people just follow the other jurors’ words. All of these potential problems are simply caused by the low standard of jury— it only requests to be a registered sate voter. Therefore, there is high probability that the decision of each jurors may lost its justice and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This essay is about juror misconduct and how it can impact a criminal trial. Juror misconduct can occur at any given criminal trial and is known to happen throughout the world. It is a contemporary issue as it is most definitely occurs in Australia. Juror misconduct can impact any form of trial; particularly criminal. Juror misconduct can vary from disobedience, inappropriate behaviour (flirting etc), phone calls and even using the internet.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kassin, S.M., & Wrightsman, L.S. (1983). The construction and validation of a juror bias scale.…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The law greatly reflects moral and ethical standards in relation to the use of juries as juries ensure an accused is judged by their peers and members of the community, however, the selection process in a jury can also result in a jury which does not fully reflect community standards. Under the Jury Act 1977 (NSW), any Australian citizen may be called to serve on a jury, and citizens are randomly selected from the electoral roll. This means that the jury is essentially a representation of the community and its interests, thus, enabling the views and opinions of society to be upheld when deciding a verdict. It also allows an accused to be judged by their peers and fellow citizens, instead of a judge, who may not be in touch with the ethical…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men Jury Duty

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Psychologist Solomon Asch defines conformity as the changing of beliefs due to either the real or the imagined pressures exerted on an individual by the ones around them. Normative and informational influences are two ways that convinced the jurors’ 7 and 4 to conform. Normative influence is defined as the influence that directs us to conforming in order to be accepted by the group. In other words, we go along to get along. An example of this was when juror 7 had switched his vote after the majority of votes became “not guilty.” Juror 7 did not have his own insight nor his own reason as to why he thought the defendant should be deemed “not guilty.” Normative influence often leads to compliance, to act in accordance with the wishes of others even though you aren’t in agreement. When juror 7 was confronted and asked for the reason why he had changed his vote, he said quietly, “I … don’t think … he’s guilty.” Juror 7 did not believe that the defendant was “not guilty”, he simply went along with the group despite his belief. In short, juror 7 changed his vote due to imagined pressure from the other jurors.The opposite of normative influence, informational influence is also displayed in this…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury Trial Analysis Paper

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will provide an analysis of a jury trial; my analysis will focus on the right of the defendant. I will articulate how a defendant 's rights at trial can be assured when it comes to The defendant’s right to a speedy trial, the defendant’s right to an impartial judge and the defendant’s right to an impartial jury.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juror's Arguement Analysis

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When discussing a single dissenting juror, an iconic film Twelve Angry Men, is a well-known portrayal of analyzing the decision-making process in groups. This film showed that persuasion in groups can take place in various methods (Proctor, 1991). Though this film shows how the minority can influence the majority, the effects of conformity were still the similar. Ultimately, a vote of 11-1 to punish the boy on trial for murdering his dad, changed to a unanimous 12 man vote to pardon him. While this dissenting juror maintained independence and ultimately influenced the majority, this is not typically the…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thus with these situations of the judge instructing the jury to choose a verdict, there would need…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    juries

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Juries are a panel of citizens selected randomly from the electoral role to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused, thus are a fundamental part of how the adversarial system functions. The right to a trial by jury is enshrined by the right to a fair trial. Juries enable a fair trial as they are members of the community who are making an impartial judgement based on what the two opposing sides presents to them, hence they are less prone to bias and bigoted views enabling them to improve access to justice. When a verdict is made, it is often made unanimously so there should be no doubt on the jurors mine as to whether the accused is guilty or not. There are some circumstances, when a majority verdict takes place 11 against 1 or 10 against 1, but only if deliberation has surpassed a reasonable time ( usually 8 hours ), so this allows for a fairer system. Being such a fundamental part of the adversarial system, if a jury is unable to make a verdict, it becomes a hung jury in which the case is dismissed and a retrial is ordered therefore ensuring that there is an equal opportunity for each party to present their side of the case and know that an impartial judgement will be made. Overall, since the right to a fair trial is significant in the adversary system, the juries are a pivotal reason as to how natural justice is achieved.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    jurors (Sommers, 2007). As a result, the concerns and questions pertaining to the internal validity…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Jury Selection

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jury selection are various methods used to decide who will be on the jury. The jury pool is initially chosen from among the community utilizing a random strategy. Jury records are gathered from voter enlistments and driver permit/state id. From these records, some people are mailed. They will be addressed in court by the judge and/or lawyers in the U.S. According to Shari Seidman, in some cases such as capital punishment, the jury must be death qualified. Jury procedures are taught in law institutions to law students. The jury chose is said to have been empanaled.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jurors perform a key part in the American arrangement of equity. The assurance of our rights and freedoms is to a great extent accomplished through the collaboration of judge and jury who, cooperating in a typical exertion, put into practice the standards of our extraordinary legacy of flexibility. The judge decides the law to be connected in the case while the jury chooses the truths. Therefore, in an imperative manner, members of the jury turn into a piece of the court itself. The American criminal justice system is the arrangement of practices and organizations of governments steered at maintaining social control, dissuading and moderating wrongdoing, or authorizing the individuals who disregard laws with criminal punishments and restoration exertions.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury Selection

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Every American that has registered to vote or has a drivers license can at any time be called to serve on a jury. There are mixed feelings about being called for duty. Some Americans see it as a nuisance that will disrupt their lives. Others see it as an opportunity to serve their country. Being called to serve, and actually serving is two different matters. A jury is ultimately selected by the judge, prosecutor and defending attorney. How they are they picked? How are they released? Maybe this paper will answer a few of these questions.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A jury is a body of persons sworn to inquire into a matter submitted to them and to give their verdict. Sociologists believe that most corruption can be seen in the jury process. The jury selection process is when people are chosen to serve on a trial jury. There are many methods to select these individuals to avoid an unfair trail. The pool is first selected at random choosing people from the community within the jurisdiction of the court. These perspective jurors are sent to summons, questioned thoroughly and obligated by law to appear in court on the specified date. The selection process is very important because the jurors will potentially be making a verdict that may or may not drastically change someone’s…

    • 2533 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One hundred and twenty three male college students were involved in the study. Participants were shown a series of lines, a ‘standard’ line and several other lines in which they would match to the standard line. Their answers were announced one by one in seated order. All participants were told to answer unanimously before the trials began, except for one person out of the group. That one person was the focus of the study, seated at the end of the seating arrangement. His answers gave insights to the effective role social pressure plays on people’s decisions (178). During the trials, 36.8 percent of the participants sided with the unanimous incorrect answers given by the group. Another trial of the study showed, when given at least two people who answered incorrectly, it drastically swayed the opinion of the chosen individual, causing the individual to answer incorrectly by 13.6 percent. Given at least three people who answered incorrectly, the percentage jumped to 31.8 percent, however, anymore than three people would cause the effects of social pressure to remain fairly consistent (180). Solomon Asch also conducted an experiment where no subjects were told of the researchers…

    • 610 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Do People Conform?

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgement. In H. Guetzkow (ed.) Groups, leadership and men. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics