Preview

Consequences Of Utilitarianism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
502 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Consequences Of Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism depends on the happiness of people and by happiness I mean pleasure. When a person experiences pleasure they usually experience pain along with it in some form, or the pain is caused to somebody else. Pleasure is not the only thing that utilitarianism depends on. Along with pleasure it depends on the amount of pleasure, how great the pleasure is, and more things that are along the lines often pleasure the consequences of an action has as an outcome. Despite the action or decision there will always be some sort of consequence. When I usually think of consequences the first thing I think of is a bad outcome that has been caused by my actions. I believe the reason I associate the word consequence with a negative thing is because I always heard people say that if you do that there will be …show more content…
First the person decided to go to a party and this put the person in the bad situation with the rapid fire gunmen, which is the consequence for going. The second thing is that the person lied about their location; therefore, the consequence is that their parents are unable to send the police to the correct address for they are unaware of the location. Consequences are bound to happen when a decision is made, but one can try to make the decision that has the most positive outcome out of the choices. The purpose of making a decision according to utilitarianism is to make the most pleasure possible be presented in the consequences of the decision or action. Obviously if one may make a decision they believe will bring the most pleasure, they can not help it if it turns out that the decision they made ends up causing more pain than pleasures. We can not always predict the outcome correctly we just have to hope that we picked the correct path and that it will positively affect people. As long as the consequences of the action or decision produces more pleasure than pain, then that decision or action is favored according to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Troop Fighting Procedures

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Troop Leading Procedures and the Military Decision-Making Process are two different procedures. They are used in the military to help pass down information from the higher levels down to the lower ones. These different procedures are used at different levels in the chain of command. They are both used to help solve problems at an easier speed of time.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ASSIGNMENT 301 Task B

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this case it is important to balance Hannah’s rights vs the duty of care towards her.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eth 316 Week 1

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilitarianism usually relies on predicting the consequences of an action. Utilitarianism sets that an action is morally right when the action produces more total utility for the group than any other alternative (Boylan, Chapter 12, 2009). In this ethical theory, the consequences should fully be considered, as it will affect the most people.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    utilitarion vs kantianism

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The main rule of utilitarianism is to perform the one action that will provide the greatest amount of pleasure and the least amount of pain to the greatest number of people. In our case study, one would think the choice is quite easy, if we let go of Gary, we are providing no happiness for anyone and a great deal of pain to his family and friends and to ourselves. However, the one person that will get pleasure from this scenario is perhaps Gary, who is suffering. According to the utilitarian theory, the right action to perform would be to do everything in our power to save Gary, because if we save him there would be a lot more people that will be happy then if we were to let him die. There is only one person who would get pleasure from letting Gary go, and that is Gary himself. One could argue that the person watching Gary suffer will provide that person with a great amount of pain, but if we were to let Gary go, as painful as it may be to watch our friend die and be the one responsible, we may find ourselves happy that he did not suffer. The Greatest Happiness Principle suggest that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to promote the reverse of happiness. In our case study, saving Gary would promote happiness to ourselves and friends and family of Gary, letting Gary succumb to his injuries and letting go will promote the reverse of happiness to ourselves and friends and family of Gary. According to Mill, pleasures are qualitatively different, depending on their origin, meaning some pleasures should be counted more heavily. Does the pleasure we will receive in saving Gary and watching him live outweigh the pleasure Gary might receive by not suffering and dying a quick death. According to…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article, “Strengths and Weaknesses of Utilitarianism”, Louis P. Pojman explained the grounds on which utilitarianism has been attacked and showed some possible response to its defenders which imply his positive attitude towards utilitarianism [1] . In order to argue that thesis, Pojman’s one important premise is the response to the no-rest objection. He believed that the agent should aim at maximizing his or her own happiness as well as other people’s happiness and is best not to worry much about the need of those not in our primary circle.[1] .…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    On this topic of gay marriage I’ve chosen the two ethical theories of utilitarianism and the Kantian ethics theory. On the pro side the utilitarianism theory plays a huge role when referring to this topic. Some may argue that it is constitutional and some may say that it just isn’t the right thing to do in this country. With this theory the actions are said to be judged in terms of promotion of human happiness. If someone is happy why it should matter what the law or government thinks. It’s important in addition with this topic because gay marriage is something that has been going on for a couple years now. The news and media has made it obvious, and with this argument there are two sides. Should gay marriage be acted upon as something normal…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the argument of utilitarianism, if the consequences of an action are good, benefiting the population, then they are considered good. On the other hand, if the actions have negative consequences, then they are considered bad. The consequences…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Utilitarian Theorists believe that punishment should be developed based on what is best for the public as a whole. Utilitarian theorists are forward looking as opposed to retribution theorists. The goal of utilitarian theorists is to prevent a crime from happening again. In a general sense this means that the punishment for a certain crime needs to be great than the possible reward for committing the crime. A utilitarian theorist believes that if this appropriate level of punishment is met, most individuals will be deterred from committing the crime.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a teleological theory which looks at the consequences of an act to decide whether it is right or wrong. There are lots of strengths to utilitarianism and not many weaknesses. One of the strengths is that it is a theory which established whether something was good or bad according to the majority of people. Bentham came up with this theory and it is known as the principle of utility. Bentham said ‘Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them to point out what we shall do’. This is the foundation for the principle of utility and it is a strength to utilitarianism as pleasure and pain can determine how people act. Bentham also said the aim of utilitarianism is ‘the greatest good of the greatest number’ and he used the Hedonic Calculus that he created to measure how good an act is and how many people it will affect, this is a major strength of utilitarianism because it tries to please everyone and each individual is equal. A weakness of Bentham’s view was noticed by Mill, Mill said it failed to differentiate humans from animals as animals can share the same pleasures that humans have, so this make human beings equal to animals. Mill also said that Bentham’s Hedonic Calculus was a weakness as it was too impractical as to use it you have to think of the; purity, intensity, certainty, extent, duration and fecundity of an act. In some situations this would be pointless as there might not be time to complete the Hedonic Calculus. For example is your house was on fire and you only had time to save either you cat or your dog you would not be able to think through the Hedonic Calculus as by the time you have your house would be burnt to the ground. This is a weakness to Bentham’s theory but not to utilitarianism because you can still please the majority without looking at the Hedonic Calculus every time you want to complete an act.Bernard…

    • 517 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Utilitarian Theory of punishment seeks to punish those that break the law in order to discourage or deter future wrongdoing. According to the Utilitarian Theory, law should be used in order to maximize the happiness of society. Both crime and punishment are inconsistent with happiness, and therefore utilitarianism believes that both of these factors should be kept to the minimum. The utilitarianism theory is ‘consequentialist,’ which means that utilitarianism recognizes that punishment has consequences for both the individual, and society as a whole. The total good that derives from the punishment must exceed the bad that may come from it.…

    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism Is Wrong

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    First I would like to start off by defining what utilitarian mean well based off of the module a utilitarian is the person who believes in the greater good in other words a person who would take losses and justify it’s worth by the results gained from it. Now in regard to the question on how might utilitarian respond to the situation of the innocent man who was executed in order to keep the citizens from rioting. My answer to that is it would be the exact same result, because of how a utilitarian thinks. In situations like this I would guess that a utilitranian would not even hesitate to kill the innocent man, because a utilitrain would think that excuting the innocent man would be beneficial for the majority of the citizens so he would…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism is considered a teleological theory, meaning that the rightness of actions is determined solely be the amount of good consequences they produce. According to utilitarianism, morality is about producing good consequences, not having good intentions. The utilitarian argument is…

    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the philosophy of utilitarianism, the law should be used to maximize the well being of society. Since crime and punishment is inconsistent with happiness, should be kept to a minimum. Utilitarian understand that a social crime that does…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among the ethical arguments that we have seen, it is clear that a form of utilitarianism is the best option, that is, we should always do what brings about the best outcome where the outcomes are rated by the amount of good they bring about. The utilitarian argument says that in any given decision, the option that brings about the most good is the right thing to do every time. That being said, the definition of good is extremely important to the soundness of the argument. In this case, the best view of what is good is that of a hedonist, that is, a thing is good if it brings about pleasure and bad if it brings about suffering. To add to this however, I would argue that the best good outcome is the outcome which…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays