Preview

Conservatism Vs. What Is The Primary Tenets Of Fascism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
664 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conservatism Vs. What Is The Primary Tenets Of Fascism
An ideology on the opposite end of the political spectrum from pacifism is fascism. Fascism is deeply rooted in the idea that humans require strong leadership in order for a society to work (Freeland 2018). A core tenet of fascism is that strength, power and domination should be embraced by the individual and one should never shy away from these positions, because in the eyes of a fascist the strongest survive (Freeland 2018). Considering that the strongest survive in a government, this indicates that competition is encouraged in a governing society. However, the theorist’s pacifism clearly state that competition is harmful to a society as it leads to violence. This is important because their different opinions on the use of violence is the …show more content…
Furthermore, fascism disfavored the thought of Marxism and Liberalism because they placed too much emphasis on the rationality of the individual (McCullough 2018). When looking at Liberalism, liberalists advocated for less government interference and believed people should use reason to make decisions. This is similar to pacifism, as they also endorse the idea of human rationality. Therefore, fascists disapprove of ideologies like Marxism, Liberalism and pacifism because they allow more freedom to the individual. Racism is also understood as a crucial aspect to the principles of fascism. Although, it is evident through the mass extermination of the Jews in Germany that Hitler was racist, it crucial to Benito Mussolini. Mussolini, campaigned for the persecution of the Jews in 1938, which was a direct attack against their race. Mussolini not only attacks the Jewish people in Italy but he attacked the idea of pacifism and disapproved of anyone who agreed with its concept of peace (McCullough …show more content…
I personally do not believe that violent tactics allow for any form of change. Violence only leads to death and enemies and in politics to obtain power and to have a strong system, alliances with other strong powerful nations is crucial. When taking a pacifist approach, communication and nonviolent means have a better chance and rectifying the situation rather than making things worse. When looking at leaders in Pacifism like Gandhi, he is remembered for his kind nature and he is known for solving problems with a nonviolent humane approach. Whereas, when leaders like Hitler and Mussolini are remembered, they are remembered for death, racism and barbaric acts, which did not lead to good change for a governing society. Therefore, in order for healthy sociopolitical change to strengthen a governing society, pacifism will not result in tragic acts that cost the lives of people in the military, government, or anyone crucial to the function of a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lao Tzu's "Thoughts from the Tao-Te-Ching" took a more pacifistic approach. He believes that no man had the right to defeat enemies by using violence and…

    • 743 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main ideas represented in this text are Violence versus non-violence/ pacifism versus direct action, relationships, and the clash of cultures.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    11.3 Dbq

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Benito Mussolini was the leader of the Fascist Party in Italy and he had always resisted codifying the principle of fascism, but when the Enciclopedia Italiana requested an article explaining fascism, he insisted on giving his process behind the way a country should be runned. The explanation of the principle of fascism was “The Doctrine of Fascism” published in 1932. Fascism is the idea of giving interest in economic, social, and military power to a dominant race or state lead by one leader. Fascism is used to categorize censorship and oppression. Benito believed in one ruler and all the other political parties were banned in Italy. In Italy everything was made to favor the fascist government. But Benito helped society by providing jobs to unemployed people by using public work camp. Fascism brought a better economy after the war but…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The day the Great Depression started is known as Black Tuesday, it is the day the stock marets crashed. The saock prices crashed to a point whereit was believed for them to never rise again. This cause a long period of panic struck. Many people tried to sell their purchased stocks bnot a single personwas buying. The stock market was seen as road to riches and after it crashed it was shadowed in people seeing it as a road to bankruptcy.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nonviolence has proven to be a more effective method of obtaining one’s goals when it…

    • 2937 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both German fascism, led by Adolf Hitler and Italian fascism, led by Benito Mussolini exploited many economical and political difficulties within their nation in order to gain power. Hitler blamed Germany's ruined economy on the Weimar Republic, Communists, and Jews, while Mussolini blamed large Socialist and Catholic parties for Italy's economic struggles. They also gained the support of farmers, small businessmen, civil servants, and young people by advocating strict nationalistic goals and blaming their economic troubles on the Bolsheviks. Nevertheless, the most crucial components of securing political power was though…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aldous Huxley provides strong and valid points in An Encyclopedia of Pacifism favoring the widespread use of pacifism. He actively responds to critics throughout his essay while also providing his own ideas and opinions about certain subjects. The main focuses of his argument is if war is a natural state and the justification of pacifism. While Huxley admits that pacifism is not a perfect policy, he also feels that it has not been implemented on a large enough scale to show its real effects. One thing is for certain though and that is war will not be the permanent solution to addressing indifferences.…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand Absolute pacifism completely rejects the idea of war and that it is never right to take part in war, even in self defence. The value of human life…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the World War II battle some people believed that pacifism was the answer toward stopping it. George Orwell, one of the most important controversial writers during the twentieth century, was stunned and enraged at the people who believed pacifism would help end the war. How can someone expect to win by being pacifist when the enemy cannot be reasoned with? Orwell’s passionate antifascism during War World II led him into conflict with the liberal pacifist movement. This led him to attack back against active pacifist with his writings in the “London Letter”, a column in the American magazine Partisan Review .This addressed how pacifism during a war does nothing to stop the enemy but instead gives them the upper hand. Orwell’s assertion that pacifism during World War II aids the enemy is correct.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the tests of time men and women across the world have shown they really are in times of conflict. In times where the true character of a person is really put to the limit, people are able to see who they really are. These conflicts can serve to reveal unexpected qualities in an individual. Times of conflict can suddenly expose a person’s true moral fibre and the courage of their convictions. A number of people may shy away from their personal qualities, and do their best not to big note themselves, however for some, in times of strong divergence between people or even countries, a persons ability to reason with their counterpart and show elements of compromise and understanding can all of a sudden come to the fore. Conflict can inadvertently result in the discovery of a person’s true beliefs, and their ability to express them with no fear of their opposition’s retaliation. The quality to stand up for what you believe in can reveal itself in these times of disagreement, just like when Martin Luther proclaimed that he ‘Had a Dream’, he went against the grain of society and discovered his enormous will and determination to rise up for what he stands for. However these qualities are not always positive ones, and can emerge from the most brutal of circumstances. The willingness to take a fellow humans life is especially evident in times of war and terror, revealing vicious and unruly qualities in some individuals. The late Osama bin Laden has been notorious for displaying these qualities, perplexing the world at the extent of his inhumane behaviour in instances of…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 2012, it was estimated that more than 172 million people were affected by conflict worldwide. The effect of so many people being affected by conflicts is a way to respond to them. With all the conflicts in the world, people need to be able to respond and react to these conflicts in the best possible way. People can best respond to conflict by believing in what they think is right and persevering through everything against them, so they can show what is morally right, let nothing hold them back, and help others with the same issue along the way. During times of conflict, it is important for people to choose a side they believe in, so they can show what they think is right.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nonviolent struggle has been utilized countless times throughout the history of civilization. Contrary to popular belief, many of the world’s greatest wars are fought free of violence. Nonviolent actions offer an alternative approach to conflict resolution; one that does not resort to literal war and prevents blood shedding. The motivation behind these struggles vary, but the desired outcome is always to promote or prevent a change. Conflicts are diverse, and typically they are concerned with social, economic, ethnic, religious, national, humanitarian, and political matters (Sharp, 2005, p. 15).…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Liberalism is a political philosophy which emphasizes on the rights of an individual, and usually the rights will assure by the government. Liberalism has turned up for around 300 years, and the complexity to explain and define liberalism is increasing as there are several forms, including classical liberalism, neo-liberalism, conservative liberalism, social liberalism, libertarianism and libertarian socialism (Mastin, 2008). Although anarchism, communism, democratic socialism, social democracy, communitarianism and liberal conservatism have the same objective with liberalism which support for democracy as well as basic equality and against authoritarianism, but it does not consider as liberalism (Haar, 2015).…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The practice of violence, like all action, changes the world, but the most probable change is to a more violent world” (Arendt pg 80). Violence is contagious, like a disease, which will destroy nations and our morals as human beings. Each individual has his or her own definition of violence and when it is acceptable or ethical to use it. Martin Luther King Jr., Walter Benjamin, and Hannah Arendt are among the many that wrote about the different facets of violence, in what cases it is ethical, the role we as individuals play in this violent society and the political aspects behind our violence.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miranda Warnings

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Now the question is what should I do in this case? What I would do is tell the main person in charge at that moment, it could be the captain, sergeant, or lieutenant, that the criminal needs an interpreter in order to Mirandize the suspect. Also, I would deal with the family in English since they are English speakers. If the family doesn’t understand the meaning of Miranda rights I would explain the meaning of…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays