Preview

Constitutional Responsibility

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
930 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Constitutional Responsibility
The Constitutional responsibility of the press is to inform the public. The First Amendment comes into direct conflict with the rights and responsibilities of media coverage. There is a fine line between personal privacy and the publics right to know. The constitution overrides the option of privacy beside the amendment of freedom of speech or freedom of the press. Freedom of the press is to be guarded as an inalienable right of the people in a free society. Freedom of the press carries along with it the right to discuss, question and challenge the actions of our government and of our public and private institutions. Journalists hold the right to verbalize unpopular opinions and the privilege to consent with the majority.

In a hypothetical
…show more content…
The uselessness of hearsay information or a animus tip does no good on the creditability of the news. If there is potential situation developing, it would be a good idea for a journalist to watch and wait for the events to unfold , then gather the necessary facts upon gaining the information. It is unconstitutional to spread lies about an individual. Even if false information is printed it could take a considerable amount of time for an individual to regain the publics favor. A journalist is aiming to be ethical before they print an article . Sometimes it may seem as though a writer is trying to destroy an individual. In most cases this is not true In any case an investigation is done to gather the facts relevant to the situation. Thus arriving at the question of right verses wrong. In some opinion snooping around and peeking through windows is reasonable. However this is a major violation of privacy. The morality of most people would not appreciate the idea of a journalist lurking about spying on every move they make. In any form of news media, information must be gathered to create an accurate picture of the actual events. Therefore it is reasonable to investigate the person in which information is necessary to obtain. It is unfair to take the investigation to the point where the law is …show more content…
There are many situations which sit on the line of right and wrong . The press holds the responsibility to inform the people of the news whether it is logical or not. The Government imposes restrictions despite the apparently absolute nature of the First Amendment to the Constitution, which states "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press." Keeping this in mind gives any journalist the right to write, print, or speak about any thing.

If any person were subject to a similar situation the issues would be totally different. However, this person is running for president which makes him subject to the constant pressure of the news media. The person becomes a target. The first wrong move he makes will be on the front page of every newspaper and the top story of the evening news. Even if a common person was involved, instead of a presidential candidate the press would have the option to follow up a story on the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Reasoning: Justice Hughes acknowledges that there are limits to freedom of the press, however, any constitutional restraints can only be imposed in very special and extreme circumstances such as obscenity or the obstruction of the war effort. In this case the Judge ruled that there were no such vital threats at risk. The judge ruled that the most important freedom of the press in the right to operate without prior censorship.…

    • 1889 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    5.04 Rose for Emily

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Do you believe journalists have a duty to be "watchdogs" for the public? Why or why not?…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Impartial juror was “one free from the dominant influence of knowledge acquired outside of the courtroom, free from strong and deep impressions that closes the mind” – Justice John Marshall…

    • 4329 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thus, the press is a public interest, even if news agencies are privately owned companies. The press must be analytical, knowledgeable, independent, and high-quality. If it fails to have these qualities, then the government has the right to intervene in the name of the people (p. 241).…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The freedom of press provides people to freely present all of their ideas and opinions without any restrictions. It lets people put out their different beliefs, even if it opposes with the majority. The freedom of press allows people to see opinions that may differ from their own but it also lets them see opinions that they might agree with. Tocqueville writes, “every citizen must be presumed to possess the power of discriminating between the different opinions of his cotemporaries, and of appreciating the different facts from which inferences may be drawn” (Tocqueville 149). People are supposed to acknowledge ideas and beliefs that differ from their own, because that is the best way to ensure that their original belief is the strongest.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What´s Muckraker?

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page

    A journalist takes the search for a story to far and because of their search it can easily ruin someone’s life. A Canadian minister was on medical leave and she was called on fraud because a picture 5 years old resurfaced on social media; showing her in Mexico eating dinner and he finished his story sending it in before making sure he had the…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    So the very survival of democracy inevitably depends on the freedom of the press. At the same time, the press shall not fail to follow misused of the freedom and all of its code of…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Founding Fathers included the right of freedom of the press in the First Amendment in order to ensure the spread of intellectual, and typically liberal, ideas among the citizens, just as was done in order to inspire the revolution. This freedom’s intrinsic part of the the birth of America, its changing interpretations by the citizens and the courts, and the public nature of the press itself have made this First Amendment right prominent in the evolution of the nation as well as a constant topic of debate throughout U.S. history.…

    • 91 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    That One Story and Stuff.

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Do you believe journalists have a duty to be "watchdogs" for the public? Why or why not?…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As of now I personally believe the press has about the right amount of freedom to say what they need to say. As long as it is appropriate we all (even the press) can have their freedom of speech.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Edwin Rivera Mrs. Kehrmeyer English 11 5 April, 2017 First Amendment-Freedom Of The Press Freedom of the press is part of the five main freedoms represented in the United States Constitution. The First Amendment was ratified in 1791 along with the Bill Of Rights with also brought 9 other amendments including the First. The freedom given from the First Amendment have helped solve many court cases, and is still used in our daily lives everyday. The First Amendment is the leading role of new amendments in our constitution. First, the meaning of Freedom Of The Press is “freedom of the press is guaranteed by the first amendment to the U.S Constitution, which prohibits Congress from making laws abridging the freedom … of the press (Source #3).”…

    • 2043 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As in speech, technology has provided another excuse for government intrusion in the press. The Secret Service can confiscate computers, printers, hard disks, and mail from electronic services they do not consider a press. Entire stores of books and videotapes are seized because of sexually explicit material. The Bill of Rights and the First Amendment exists to protect speech and press that is unpopular. "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression (Steele)." If unpopular ideas did not exist, we would not need the First Amendment.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    United States” is a perfect example of the supreme court protecting the right. This case took place in 1971. Daniel Ellsberg, a pentagon employee, turned in documents describing the involvement of the United States in Vietnam. The supreme court stated that “No branch of government could abridge the freedom of press, speech, religion and assembly.” I couldn't have said it better myself. In other words, you can't interfere with the freedom of the press. Don't you think us the people deserve to know what our country did in Vietnam? We are all apart of one nation and we all should know what America is getting involved…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Press freedom may be identified with the liberty to discuss publicly and truthfully any matter of public concern without censorship or punishment. The general principle is that freedom of expression is the rule and restrictions the exemption. The power to exercise prior restraint is not to be presumed, rather the presumption is against its validity.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays