Preview

Constructive Discharge

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
767 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Constructive Discharge
To: CEO Wilson
From: J. Godsey
Re: Constructive Discharge Claim of Emily Watson
Mr. Wilson,
As you asked, I have researched the claim of constructive discharge by former employee Emily Watson. Ms. Watson is claiming that she had no choice but to resign based on the fact that she was scheduled to work Sundays. According to Ms. Watson, this is an infringement on her religious beliefs and she is claiming discrimination and constructive discharge based on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Constructive Discharge and the Civil Rights Act of 1964
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits intentional discrimination or “practices that have the effect of against any person based on race, national origin, sexual preference, religion or disability discriminating against individuals because of their race, color, national origin, religion, or sex” (The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, n.d.).
According to US Legal, Constructive Discharge occurs when a person’s work situation is so intolerable that the average person would quit (US Legal, n.d.).
Ms. Watson is claiming that her new schedule made it impossible for her to continue working for Blammo Toys because she would be forced to work on Sundays. Ms. Watson’s religious beliefs do not allow her to work on Sunday’s, so she quit rather than work the new schedule. Ms. Watson is claiming that because her new schedule would require her to on Sundays that Blammo Toys has discriminated against her because of her religious beliefs. As such, she was forced to resign.
According to the Supreme Court, the burden of proof is on Ms. Watson to prove constructive discharge. “An employer may defend against such a claim by showing both (1) that it had installed a readily accessible and effective policy for reporting and resolving complaints of sexual harassment, and (2) that the plaintiff unreasonably failed to avail herself of that employer-provided preventive or remedial apparatus” (Pennsylvania State Police vs.



References: Cockrell v. boise cascade corp., 781 F.2d 173 (10th Cir 1986). Meritor savings bank v. vinson, 84-1979 ( U.S. 57 June 19, 1986). Pennsylvania state police vs. suders, (03-95) (542 U.S. 129 June 14, 2004). 12, 2011, from FindLaw: http://employment.findlaw.com/employment/employment- employee-%20discrimination-harrassment/civil-rights-title-7.html US Legal. (n.d.). Constructive discharge law and legal definition. Retrieved June 12, 2011, from US Legal: http://definitions.uslegal.com/c/constructive-discharge

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Ms. Granbury can claim illegal discharge through citing breach of an implied contract. The handbook lists a number of grounds on which an employees’ employment may be terminated. It…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jdt2 Task 1

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages

    | Per your request to investigate and recommend Toy Company’s position regarding Claim #1-2013; this report was generated. The initial research has been finalized and recommendations determined. I will refer to the claim by its number #1-2013 and the claimant as AA23 to keep the confidentiality of the claimant. First this report will provide a summary of the claim and the history associated with it. Second it will discuss the definition of Constructive Discharge and its relevance to this claim. Third it will provide the specific areas under the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Fourth it will offer recommendations and supporting legal references. Fifth it will recommend proactive steps to avoid future legal issues in relationship to the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. And finally any references used in this research will be provided. A. Definition of Constructive DischargeSummary of Claim and history:In January 1, 2013 a new policy was implemented to support exponential company growth. This policy impacted all production employees. The impacted employees were notified of the changes two months in advance of the January 2013 implementation to allow for assimilation and training on the new shifts schedules and there impacts. Production employee schedules were shifted from a Monday through Friday schedule, 8 hour shift to a Monday through Sunday schedule, 12 hour shift, four working days can occur any day of the week. This schedule requires all production employees to work on holy days regardless of religious affiliation as the production now runs seven days a week.Office staff members were not impacted by this policy change.AA23 quit on January 2, 2013 after new policy was in effect.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Constructive discharge occurs when the employer's conduct effectively forces an employee to resign. Although the employee may say, "I quit," the employment relationship is actually severed involuntarily by the employer's acts, against the employee's will. As a result, a constructive discharge is legally regarded as a firing rather than a resignation. An employee cannot simply "quit and sue," claiming he or she was constructively discharged. The conditions giving rise to the resignation must be sufficiently extraordinary and…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discharge summary Case 1

    • 225 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Patient presented to the emergency room, complaining of vaginal bleeding with pain in the lower pelvic area. Ultrasound preformed in the emergency room showed a 13.8 cm left adnexal mass with positive cardiac activity, Compatible with ectopic pregnancy.…

    • 225 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    JDT2 Task 1

    • 1672 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to an article in the University of Chicago Law Review, courts generally apply two tests when deciding if constructive discharge has occurred. The first is the reasonable person test, meaning that the working conditions are so intolerable that a reasonable person would conclude that resigning is the only recourse. The second is the specific intent test. The plaintiff must show that the employer “created those conditions with the specific intent to cause the employee to resign” (Finnegan, 1986). Mr. Anderson’s case is unlikely to pass either test. According to the production manager, no other employees have resigned or come forward with complaints about the new schedule. Also, the new schedule was implemented solely as a response to increased production demand. It was enforced across the board among all production staff. Meeting minutes and administrative emails prior to the scheduling change do not indicate any intent to make Mr. Anderson or any…

    • 1672 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rjdt Task-1

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the given scenario it appears that the employee in question has resigned as a result of being required to work on a religious holy day and although not stated in the scenario it is assumed that the employee did bring this conflict to the attention of his/her supervisor and that an accommodation reasonable to both employer and employee was not reached, thus resulting in an intolerable work conditions requiring the employee to resign based upon his/her religious beliefs. If the above assumptions prove to be true then the situation would more probably than not amount to constructive discharge under Title VII of the civil rights act and the company may be liable to the employee for resulting damages in addition to fines that may be imposed by the EEOC. A further review by legal counsel is urgently recommended.…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Memo for Task 1

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A. According to US Legal Constructive Discharge is generally when working conditions are so intolerable to amount to a firing, despite a lack of a formal termination notice. Most of the time unemployment benefits are not payable unless a Constructive Discharge can be proven. However, it can be established by one of the following: evidence of difficult/unpleasant working conditions so bad that a reasonable person would not remain or evidence of poor conduct by the employer or its agent such as sexual harassment, assault or harassment. Before this can be proven the employee should have notified the employer in writing about the condition and allowed the employer 15 days to respond to see if a reasonable agreement can be made. In the referenced scenario Constructive Discharge does not apply because of these factors: the shift change was due to company growth and the entire production department was affected not one single person therefore no misconduct was shown to employee; the employee failed to notify the employer of the intent to cease working due to the shift change and the employer was not given the appropriate amount of time (15 days) to respond to see if an alternative could be reached such as allowing the employee to move to a different department that was not affected by the shift change; to prove a Constructive Discharge claim the plaintiff would need to prove that it violated his/her religious beliefs and that the employer made the working conditions intolerable. The employee in the referenced scenario felt that the employer was purposefully changing the work week to make conditions intolerable but in fact the employer made these changes to accommodate for the increase in growth and to avoid undue hardship on the company made the decision to change regardless of working on holy days. Because the employer…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it illegal to discriminate against someone on the basis of their race, color, religion, national origin, or sex . This law provides legal recourse for employees to seek Constructive Discharge for discrimination of their legal rights if they believe a change to a policy or procedure has violated their rights (Shaker, n.d.). The law specific to religious beliefs applies to this situation that has occurred within the company.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term constructive discharge is by definition when an employee feels they are forced to resign their job because the employer has made working conditions unbearable (Doyle,2013). In the circumstance presented, the employee felt compelled to resign because the work schedule was changed and would require him to work on his religious holy day. The business changed the production team schedule to accommodate growth and expansion, changing the schedule from 8:00am-5:00pm, Monday thru Friday, to four twelve hour shifts. The employees would rotate four days on and four…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Constructive Discharge – Employer fails to provide accommodations to a reasonable request resulting in the employee quitting. The employee must prove that work conditions were unbearable and that continued employment was not an option (Shaker).…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A constructive discharge arises when a wage earner maintains the organization forced him/her to step down because working environments were made unbearable. The claim of constructive discharge under the Title VII Civil Rights Act of 1964 by Mr. X, is unjustified. The employee notifying the company that he was upset with the scheduling change in the production area never filed a complaint. Furthermore, Mr. X did not allow the organization the opportunity to respond to the claim. Thus, the organization was not aware the production schedule change created an unbearable working environment.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wgu Human Resources Task 1

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    At the beginning of the year the toy Company instituted a work schedule change to keep up with the growth of production of the company. The schedule change consisted of 12 hour shifts with 4 days of work and 4 days off. This change means that some of the work days would fall on a religious holy day. All of the production employees will immediately begin working this new schedule. Due to this new work schedule, a claim has been filed against the toy Company under the Title Vii of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The employee is alleging that the toy Company’s enforcement of the new schedule policy on shift work is discriminatory because the policy requires the employee to work on their religious holy day. Constructive discharge occurs when working conditions are so intolerable the employee feels forced to resign from their employment. (Glazer, 2009, p. 1). Constructive discharge is part of the Title VII Civil Rights Act of 1964 that prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin and religion. ("Title VII," “n.d.”, p. 4). Religion is the…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to _____, an employee may not be fired because he or she refuses to commit an illegal act, such as perjury or price fixing…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that protects individuals from discrimination based on religion. Religious discrimination is treating a person differently because of their religious believes. In this case Elaine Mobley, a member of the nonsectarian Unitarian Universalist Church, can file a legal sue under religious discrimination or the Civil Rights Act of 1964, because she was discriminated by employees and her supervisor. They said that she would be “making efforts repeatedly to “save the soul” of a fellow employee” (Neill, 2014, Web). A proven wrongful dismissal will tend to lead to two main remedies: reinstatement of the dismissed employee, and/or monetary compensation for the wrongfully dismissed. In this case the court should look on how Elaine Mobley told her supervisor that she was feeling harassed by her employees, and shortly after that she was fired. In this case the judge should rule in favor of Elaine Mobley, because of what we have of the case it seems that she was being harassed and told her director of division and did nothing but fire her. The employer did in fact discriminate unlawfully, because you cannot force someone to become one of your same religion. It is especially unlawful to leave messages in her desk stating “How can you speak of God and Reject me? I love you and know all about you” as the book stated (Nkomo, Fottler, McAfee, 7 edition, p. 56).…

    • 2010 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In all 50 states there is something called the equal employment opportunity commission it makes it illegal for a job to discriminate against an applicant or an employee based on their sex orientation religion race age disability national origin and even pregnancy…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays