Farmers began using “protein powder” in their products to fool quality checks. Some of the dairy cows were under nourished so the milk was not of high enough quality. So, companies began selling “protein powder” to farmers, promising to help pass quality inspections on the milk. The farmers say they never questioned what was in the powder. They didn’t feel the need to.
Not only is the milk contaminated, but so are eggs. Therefore, there must have been melamine in the feed as well as being directly poured into milk. While the amount of the toxin in the eggs is lower than that of directly pouring it into the milk, it is still at unsafe levels.
Some companies claim they knew there were additives in the milk. Although they say they did not know melamine was one of them. Among these companies is Nestle.
Melamine works to fool the quality check by appearing to be protein due to its chemical makeup. When talking to local farmers, they said some farmers would also add hydrogen peroxide into the milk, further contaminating it.
One man claims he tried to warn about unauthorized substances being added to milk products. He says he told regulators and dairy makers about the substances in 05 and 06. He says they told him they would have someone look into it, but they failed to do so. He also complained to China Central Television, which led to a full report on the issue with scenes of the additive being dumped into the milk. While officials confirmed the gentlemen’s complaint, they said they could not find any evidence of any wrongdoing.
Companies now are being more cautious. They are checking for melamine among other possible additives by running several tests on the product. However, some amounts of melamine are still being found even in those companies products who claim to be checking for contamination.
I think the situation itself was a bad one, but some good things occurred. It was very unethical of the “protein powder” producing companies to switch from natural stuff to something that could be fatal without letting people know what was in their product. They misled consumers about what was in their product. I feel sorry for the farmers who are now suffering because of the protein powder company’s poor choices. It was a good thing that the products were recalled, so that the spread of the toxic substances could be controlled. I think the “protein powder” companies should have to pay hugely for what they did to the Chinese public and even internationally.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
C. Dairy farmers are now treating cows that have mastitis with antibiotics that end up in your milk and residue may lead to serious allergies. Over time, the exposure to such antibiotics causes the body to build resistance and causes further issues such as breast, prostate and colon…
- 739 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Honest Company recall has occurred after a mold contamination was found during routine quality testing. The company states:…
- 478 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
food products keep going out of the factory while the test is taking place (Friscolanti, 2008). So…
- 1132 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
People still can decide which milk to buy; either treated cow milk or non-treated cow milk. The problem comes when people think that treated herd milk is a potential threat to their lives because they are not well informed about the facts on which different studies have relied. Even though the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has stated there is no difference between recombinant bovine somatotropin (rBST) milk and non rBST milk, people still believe there are several health, economic and animal welfare issues linked to this hormone.…
- 629 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
• Unintended Consequences: Why is our food becoming more unsafe as we advance technologically? What are some consequences of tainted foods?…
- 467 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
article shows is that China is too far behind in food safety standards, making its food…
- 2263 Words
- 10 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The FDA had actually banned aspartame based on this finding, only to have Searle Chairman Donald Rumsfeld, currently the Secretary of Defence, vow to "call in his markers," to somehow get it approved.…
- 1553 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The FDA’s 1958 Food Additives Amendment required manufacturers to prove the “safety” of new additives.…
- 423 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In the very early 1900’s, food handling had to take a massive toll. From meat hazards, the milking cows, meat cows, as well as other milk/meat breeds. If milk is not pasterized its possible to get sick and if you don't…
- 683 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
5. The proteins from the animals’ milk can be used by, being purified and then being put in a variety of medical applications. (Page 67)…
- 543 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Since the birth of the human race, the consumption of milk has been a popular nutrient. Currently, cow’s milk is considered the most consumed in the entire United States. However, contrary to popular belief, cow’s milk is not a viable source to drink from. Although it may contain many vital ingredients that living organisms need to survive, it is riddled with hormones, antibiotics, pus, and even blood. Cow’s milk is not intended for the consumption of humans; cow’s milk is for cows. The milk from cows is also believed to directly influence the creation of cancer cells.…
- 389 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Mastitis is a condition which can increase the amount of cow’s pus which ends up in the milk. Monsanto's own data shows that there is a 79% increase in mastitis (udder infections) and a resulting 19% increase in somatic cell counts (pus & bacteria in the milk). In fact, the warning label on Monsanto’s Posilac drug (their brand name for rBGH) explicitly states: "Cows injected with POSILAC are at an increased risk for clinical mastitis (visibly abnormal milk)”…
- 1416 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The trouble for the Swiss conglomerate goes back to the 1960’s. Nestle was “criticized by social activists for marketing their powered milk formula to less developed countries”. (Boyd, C., 2011) The unethical research behavior that may have been involved with this is that people were under the perception that the company was misleading how the formula “better for their babies than breast milk.” (Boyd, C., 2011) to mothers in less developed countries. The critics against the company felt that by giving this information to the mothers, they could come and continue the mothers to stay only with the formula. Critics also felt that Nestle was also giving information about the death of infants that some felt was not correct. Nestle told the mothers that infant deaths with breast fed children happened in three ways: “babies were unprotected against illnesses because of the lack of antibodies not found in breast milk”; “mothers could not afford to boil water”; and “mothers could not afford the price of the product and dilute the amount of formula which would cause malnutrition”. (Boyd, C., 2011)…
- 790 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
When it comes to the area of surveillance, there is a lack in the communication chain between federal agencies, state, and local health agencies. A good example of this lack of surveillance was back in 2008, when Federal Drug Administration found traces of melamine in infant milk products. However, the FDA concluded melamine or cyanuric acid alone, "at or below 1 part per million in infant formula do not raise public health concerns" in babies. (2008 Chinese milk scandal) Melamine is a toxic chemical that can be harmful if swallowed, inhaled, or absorbed through the skin. According to FDA scientists, melamine can be absorbed into the blood stream forming clots that can cause kidneys to malfunction. United States FDA’s limit was put at 0.63 mg, but was later reduced to 0.063 mg daily. The World Health Organization’s food safety director estimated that the amount of melamine a person could stand per day without incurring a bigger health risk, the "tolerable daily intake"…
- 1011 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
According to the New York State Food Laboratory, they found 40 parts per million of aminopterin in the food samples provided by Menu Foods. The use of aminopterin is not allowed in the U.S. except for research purposes because the drug is known to cause cancer and birth defects in humans. Other countries, however, continue to use the substance in rat poison. Experts were quick to agree, however, that it is highly unlikely that the chemical would be used to spray a crop against rodent infestation. At the time of the March 23rd news conference, the FDA had yet to complete its research into the matter, although they were continuing to focus on the food's wheat gluten. On Friday, March 30th, the agency finally announced that it believes that melamine - - a product used to make plastics - - may be the likely cause of the pet deaths. It has been found in both the pet food itself as well as in the wheat gluten. The FDA went on to say that they could not confirm any earlier statements regarding rat…
- 2094 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays