Preview

Contemporary Government Democracy

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
531 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Contemporary Government Democracy
One of the three contemporary theories of govement is The Pluralist Theory. In this theory, groups with shared interest influence public policy by pressing their concerns through organized efforts. Linkage institutions are key in this theory. Groups such as the NAACP and UAW are examples of the groups that would be pressing their concerns to the Policy Agenda. Since there isn’t just one group tying to press their concerns to the institutions of government and public officials, the power is spread among these groups. Not one group rules policy according to this theory. Also, in this theory, groups have more than one chance to get their concerns through because if they fail to get through congress they can and may succeed through the courts. Public interest is to eventually prevail through the groups in this theory. Supporters of this theory, called pluralists, believe that instead of a majority rule, groups of minorities should work together . They also think that precisely because there is a lack of group-based participation, democracy is at a decline. A negative version of pluralist theory comes in the form of another one of the three contemporary theory’s of government democracy, known as Hyper pluralism. In this theory, these interest groups are so powerful that they over rule the government, because their influence are so strong the take from the government’s ability to make policy. Basically, the groups have equal influence they cancel each other out and politics become stagnant. These interest groups include all interest groups not just elite ones. In this theory, unlike pluralistist theory where it is good that there are many groups sharing the power, in this theory, there are too many ways for groups to control policy, causing overlapping of jurisdictions and a chaotic mess stuck in policy gridlock. In this theory, the government gives in to every little interest and single group issue groups it becomes contradicting. This theory believes

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pluralism works in the way that groups and coalitions are constantly fighting for power within the government to fit their agendas and the people they are vying for. This can be seen with the bike rack debate that has been presented in Sierra Vista’s city council. The special interest group is offering an award of being a bike friendly city to Sierra Vista in hopes of making people healthier, however public opinion support of the bike racks has been dismal at best. This is a local example but the NRA is an example of a larger special interest group where a lot more wealth comes into play as in a biased pluralism only adding fuel to the ruling elite…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A pluralist government is much like the opposite of the elitist government. In a pluralist government the power of decision making and policy making are based more on the wants and needs of many rather than just a few. It is said to be a government of the people, by the people, for the people.Everyones views are valued regardless of ones position in society. This is similar to the type of government we have…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    landmark decision in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483, (1954), that would…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 5 Discussion

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A disadvantage of majority rule is the majority’s ability to vote against the interests and preferences of those in the minority without those groups or individuals being heard or involved in the discussion. Those in the minority may be disenfranchised and remove themselves from the decision-making process because they are aware they do not have the numbers to win or significantly impact the vote…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The emergence of democracy would change the United States forever. Our country today wouldn’t be what it is today without democracy in place. During the 1820s-1850s democracy truly started to appear in the nation. With ideas of every man should be equal and the uprising of the abolition movements. Women didn’t keep their thoughts out of it either. In 1828 President Jackson was elected and with this he brought the idea of everyman should be equal. He also believed in that whatever he wanted, he would get and take it by any means. Also during this time abolitionist started voicing their ideas about how there should be no slavery and that all slaves are on an equal level as the white man. Woman also felt this was the perfect time to voice their opinion as well. Not all women but some felt like they were being pushed to the side and not even looked at for any decision. The women started protests and took legal action on this and fought for their right to be acknowledged in the social and political society. All these events helped develop democracy.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Policy-Sierra Club

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Behavioral Pluralism identifies a certain set of constituency attributes that contribute to the success of advocacy groups such as the Sierra Club. According to Grossmann’s theory these constituency attributes dictate advocacy groups like the Sierra Club’s…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Democracy Dbq

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the world many societies are switching to democracies from the demand from the people in that area. One of the first democracies ever was in Athens, Greece. Even though they were the first democracy ever assembled, questions arose as to how democratic they really were. Opinions vary, but although Athens became more democratic over time, because of a series of reforms, it still was still more un-democratic then democratic. Therefore there power was too limited to be considered a true democracy due to the fact that poor people didn’t participate in government, and that only a small amount of people were considered citizens. In order to further analyze the issue, we can ask poor people their thoughts and their participation in government. Another source would be written history of the city, so they can see if the people were more satisfied under a democracy or a non-democratic state.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the pluralist model of democracy, pressure groups play an essential role. Political parties cannot provide adequate representation for the full range of diverse interests and opinions in a modern democracy because their key function is to aggregate interests into a coherent political entity capable of governing the country. Pressure groups enable particular interests and causes to be heard and to exert influence in public decision and decision-making. Yet it is precisely the representation of specialist interests and of single issues which may give…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I will discuss the concept of a Republic, also known as a Representative Democracy. The Openstax American Government textbook describes a Democracy as a political system in which people govern themselves (pg. 8). This system can come in the form of a Representative Democracy or a Direct Democracy. Direct Democracies are ones in which the citizens themselves participate directly in making laws (pg. 14). This type of government occurred in Ancient Athens. The United States Government, on the other hand, comes in the Representative Democracy form. This means that, instead of directly creating laws, the citizens choose representatives that do this for them (pg. 13). President Donald Trump is now one of those representatives. His job is to represent…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the short story, Story of an Hour, Chopin illustrates that societal expectations will subdue and repress one’s identity. Firstly, in the very first paragraph it is noted that Mrs. Mallard is afflicted with heart trouble; naturally, one would presume that she is of quite some age, however, in the eighth paragraph it reads, “She was young, with a fair, calm face, whose lines bespoke repression and even a certain strength.” (Chopin, 8th paragraph) This comes as a surprise to the reader as it was originally inferred that she was much older but now that the reader becomes aware of her age, they are able to deduce how much psychological and emotional strain must have been pressed upon her to have lines that “bespoke repression” at such a young age. As well, Mrs. Mallard may have been inclined to enjoy those first few moments of newfound freedom in solitude, as she would not like anyone to see her in peace after her husband’s death. This sentence accurately illustrates how societal norms have repressed her identity, causing her to even hide from her sister to avoid questioning.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Exam 2 Notes

    • 2574 Words
    • 11 Pages

    A group of people with shared feelings or attitudes that try to influence government policy making. Pluralism leads to interest groups.…

    • 2574 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The belief that competition among all affected interests shaps public policy. ii. Pluralists believe that political tools such as money, prestige, expertise, and access to the mass media are too widely scattered fora single elite to monopolize on them. iii. Pluralists acknowledge that big businesses, cozy elites, or career bureaucrats may dominate on some issues, but not all. V. Is Democracy driven by Self-Interest?A. Some actions are independent of self interest, but others aren’t.i. Dependent on individual’s ideals, morals, and ethics. ii. A policy may be good or bad regardless of the motive behind it. B. The belief that people will usually act on the basis of their self-interest, narrowly defined, is a theory to be tested, not an assumption to be made.i. Some people act out of purely self interest while others do not. Most people lay somewhere in between. VI. What Explains Political Change?A. Many forces drive political changei. Economic interestsii. Powerful elitesiii. Entrenched bureaucratsiv. Competing pressure groupsv. Morally impassioned individuals vi. WarsB. Many historical things have happened in U.S history causing political changei. The Great Depressionii. The development of the federal government VII. The Nature of Politics A. The Importance of Power in Politicsi. Conjures up deals, bribes, power plays, and arm twisting. ii. Shared understanding, common friendships, communal or organizational loyalties can shape…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supporters of pressure group would lead this on to say that pressure groups enhance this sense of pluralism in our democracy and make our democratic system much more effective. Although the opposite argument to this is that people claim that many organized groups can undermine the policy making process because they are dominated by people with vested interests concerned only to improve the position of certain groups within society, not the welfare of the whole country. Pressure groups also help to promote democracy because they widen the distribution of political power because pressure groups compete against one another and this ensures that no group can remain on top of all the others, so prevents an elitist situation whereby the ideologies pluralism is completely outcast from the situation. However as one group begins to turn more influential, other groups come into existence to combat them and offer rival viewpoints. Due to this, public policy is created through an ongoing debate between rival groups…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Roles Of Interest Groups

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Interest groups are a key aspect of American politics in the world today. An interest group is an organization of people with shared policy goals that enter the policy making process at several points to try and influence the policy. The development of interest groups has led to the creation of three theories used to describe them: pluralism, hyperpluralism, and elitism. Pluralism states that interest groups bring representation to all the people. Elitism is when there is an unbalance of power towards certain interest groups. Hyperpluralism states that the government is differential to interests groups and creates conflicting regulations. Hyperpluralists believe that iron triangles greatly influence the policy. Iron triangles are known…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    10. Pluralist Theory - An analysis of politics emphasizing the role of diverse and competing interest groups in preventing too much power being accumulated in the hands of political and economic elites.…

    • 5943 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays