THEORIES OF
LEADERSHIP
WHAT ARE
CONTINGENCY THEORIES?
_best way to organize a corporation
_their performances depend on internal and external situation
_leaders’ styles are classified base on these theories HOW MANY CONTINGENCY
THEORIES
DO WE HAVE?
FIEDLER MODEL
SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP THEORY
(SLT)
PATH-GOAL THEORY
<THE FIEDLER
_Developed by Fred Fiedler
MODEL>
_Leader style makes effective group performance
LEADER:
_2 leader’s styles: Relationship-oriented and Taskoriented
_LPC questionnaire:
+64 points or above:
Relationship-oriented
+57 points or below:
Task-oriented
+Middle: Cut-and-dried style leader style is fixed.
SITUATION
_Leader-member relations: confidence, trust and respect employees have for their leader; rated as
“good” or “poor”
_Task structure: the formalization and structure of job assignments; rated as “high” or “low”
_Position power: influence of leader in activities; rated as “strong” or “weak”
<SITUATIONAL
LEADERSHIP
_Developed by Paul Hersey and(SLT)>
Ken Blanchard
THEORY
_This theory focuses on the FOLLOWERS’ READINESS
WHY THIS THEORY FOCUSES ON
FOLLOWERS? - group’s effectiveness depends on actions of followers
READINESS: refers to the extent to which people have the ability and willingness to accomplish tasks
LEADER:
_4 types:
+Telling (high task-low relationship)
+Selling (high task-high relationship)
+Participating (low task-high relationship)
+Delegating (low task-low relationship)
SITUATION: 4 Stages of Followers’ readiness: _R1: unable and unwilling people
_R2: unable and willing people
_R3: able and unwilling people
_R4: able and willing people
EXAMPLE:
R1
Telling style
R2
Selling style
R3
Participating style R4
Delegating style <PATH-GOAL
_Developed by
Robert House
THEORY>
_Leader should classifies paths have least roadblocks and pitfalls for followers to attain their goals
4 LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS:
_Directive leader
_Supportive leader
_Participative leader