Convict Crimonology
Reflection Paper 1: Analysis of Convict Criminology
This reflection paper will redress topics discussed in Jeffrey Ian Ross and Stephen C. Richards’ book: Convict Criminology. First the paper will analyze the main objectives in convict criminology. Next the paper will examine the importance of convict criminology. Last, I will refute why I believe convict criminology is a waste of time and tax payer dollars, and why I believe the government should work more to support studies in victimology.
Jeffrey Ian Ross and Stephen C. Richards are ex-convicts, and they make sure their readers are well aware of that; nonetheless, their status is important, because it provides us with better insight throughout their book. Convict Criminology is a relatively new study in social sciences, in which new research and academia are introduced or taught by ex-convicts. The term “Convict Criminology” was termed by Ross and his associate Stephen C. Richards back in 2001. Ross and Richards book is the first book to feature literary contributions made by other ex-convict professors- addressing topics related to the criminal justice forum. It’s important to note, that Convict Criminology is not limited to ex-convicts who are now a part of academia- but also, current individuals incarcerated with advanced degrees, as well as “non-convicts”. (Sheridan & Richards, 2005)
Objectives of Convict Criminology
Like any other focus group the primary objective of convict criminology is reform. Ross and Richards have two objectives- they want to “Transform the way research in prisons is conducted; and second, to develop policies which will make the criminal justice system more humane”. (Ross & Richards, 2003, P. 10)
Ross and Richards rely heavily on various methodologies along with research in criminology in order to effectively communicate their frustrations with the criminal justice system and institute changes. Most of their frustrations address the morality and constitutionality of an
This reflection paper will redress topics discussed in Jeffrey Ian Ross and Stephen C. Richards’ book: Convict Criminology. First the paper will analyze the main objectives in convict criminology. Next the paper will examine the importance of convict criminology. Last, I will refute why I believe convict criminology is a waste of time and tax payer dollars, and why I believe the government should work more to support studies in victimology.
Jeffrey Ian Ross and Stephen C. Richards are ex-convicts, and they make sure their readers are well aware of that; nonetheless, their status is important, because it provides us with better insight throughout their book. Convict Criminology is a relatively new study in social sciences, in which new research and academia are introduced or taught by ex-convicts. The term “Convict Criminology” was termed by Ross and his associate Stephen C. Richards back in 2001. Ross and Richards book is the first book to feature literary contributions made by other ex-convict professors- addressing topics related to the criminal justice forum. It’s important to note, that Convict Criminology is not limited to ex-convicts who are now a part of academia- but also, current individuals incarcerated with advanced degrees, as well as “non-convicts”. (Sheridan & Richards, 2005)
Objectives of Convict Criminology
Like any other focus group the primary objective of convict criminology is reform. Ross and Richards have two objectives- they want to “Transform the way research in prisons is conducted; and second, to develop policies which will make the criminal justice system more humane”. (Ross & Richards, 2003, P. 10)
Ross and Richards rely heavily on various methodologies along with research in criminology in order to effectively communicate their frustrations with the criminal justice system and institute changes. Most of their frustrations address the morality and constitutionality of an