NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
NANYANG BUSINESS SCHOOL
AB329 APPLIED RESEARCH PROJECT
Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Study of Family and Non-family Controlled Firms in Singapore
U1010347C
U1010546K
U1010424G
Chua Ang Hong
Ho Chuan Lui
Tee Chin Siang Bryan
Supervisor: Associate Professor Ho Kim Wai
Applied Research Project submitted to the Nanyang Business School, Nanyang
Technological University in partial fulfillment for the double degree of Bachelor of
Accountancy and Bachelor of Business.
Academic Year 2012/2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………...
ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………
1)
INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………......
2)
LITERATURE REVIEW…………………………………………………..
2.1)
Family and Non-family Companies’ Performance…………….........
2.2)
Board Composition………………………………………………….
2.3)
Directors’ Qualification……………………………………………..
2.4)
Board Meetings……………………………………………………...
2.5)
Leadership Structure………………………………………………...
2.6)
Control Variables……………………………………………………
3)
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY………………………………………......
3.1)
Data…………………………………………………………….........
3.2)
Research Model and Measurement…………………………….........
3.3)
Model Specification…………………………………………………
3.4)
Approach……………………………………………………………
4)
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS……………………………………………….
4.1)
Descriptive Analysis…………………………………………...........
4.2)
Univariate Test……………………………………………………...
4.3)
Inferential Analysis…………………………………………….........
4.4)
Multivariate Tests…………………………………………………...
4.4.1) Pooled OLS………………………………………………..
4.4.2) Panel Data Regression……………………………………..
5)
LIMITATIONS AND FURTHER RESEARCH………………………….
6)
CONCLUSION……………………………………………………………...
BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………………..
APPENDIX A……………………………………………………………………….
APPENDIX B……………………………………………………………………….
ii
iii iv 1
4
4
5
7
9
10
12
13
13
14
14
16
17
17
18
21
23
23
24
26
29
30
36
37
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would
Bibliography: Alcorn, P.B., Success and Survival in the Family-Owned Business. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, (1982). Baltagi, B, Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 2nd Edition. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, (2001). Organization, (1985), 1(1), pp. 101-124. Becker, G.S., “A theory of social interactions”. Journal of Political Economy, (1974), 82(6), pp Berle, A. and G. Means, The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World, (1932). Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, (1996), 31, pp. 337-355. Boyd, B., “CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model”. Strategic Management Journal, (1995), 16, pp Journal of Financial Economics, (1994), 34, pp. 371-390. Management, (1999), 38, pp. 111-118. (November 1996). Business Strategy, (2006), 17(2), pp. 37-51. (2004), 2(1), pp. 119-128. Harvard Business Review, (1998), 76, pp. 136-148. agency costs of family and non-family firms””. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, (2004), 28, pp Daily, C.M. and M.J. Dollinger, “Family Firms Are Different”. Review of Business, (1991), 13(1), pp Family and Professionally Managed Firms”. Family Business Review, (1992), 5(2), pp. Danco, L.A., Inside the Family Business. Cleveland, Ohio: The University Press, (1980). Dyer, W.G., Cultural Change in Family Firms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, (1986). Fama, E.F. and M.C. Jensen, “Separation of Ownership and Control”. Journal of Law and Economics, (June 1983), 26(2), pp Felton, R.F. and M. Watson, “Change Across the Board”. The McKinsey Quarterly, (2002), 4, pp