RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Title: Correlation of Using Computer-Aided Instruction in C# Programming Language
Researchers: Cirera, Stephany D. Mendoza, Danice Angelica S. Monje, Shiela C.
DEGREE: Bachelor of Industrial Education Major in
Computer Education
Professor: Wilhelma Gatmaitan-Borjal, Ed. D.
Chapter 1
THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND
Introduction
The environment in which students learn, the ways in which people work and live are constantly being transformed by existing and emerging technologies. Educational expansion and constraint over the last decade form the backdrop of any examination of the role of technology. One of these educational expansions is the computer-aided instrument or sometimes abbreviated as CAI which refers to a computer or computer system. It is also known as “computer assisted instruction” which pertains to a diverse and rapidly expanding spectrum of computer technologies that assist the teaching and learning process. (http://encartamsn.com/) Computer aided instruction can be used effectively to address academic and communication/language skills. It can dramatically increase student’s access to information. The program can adapt to the abilities and preferences of the individual student and increase the amount of personalized instruction a student receives. Many students benefit from the immediate responsiveness of computer interactions and appreciate the self-paced and private learning environment. Moreover, computer-learning experience often engages the interest of students, motivating them to learn and increasing independence and personal responsibility for education. (http://www.ima.umn.edu/~arnold/papers/cai.pdf) Being well-informed and active participant in our society, the students need to be self-directed learners, able to identify issues, pose questions,
Bibliography: P. M. Symonds, "A Social-Attitudes Questionnaire," Journal of Educational Psychology (1925), pp. 316-22. Chan, V (2001). Learning autonomously: the learners’ perspective. Journal of Further and Higher Education 25 (3). 285 – 300 Andersen, K., &Miller, E Bachen, C. M., McLoughlin, M. M., & Garcia, S. S. (1999). Assessing the role of gender in college students ' evaluations of faculty. Communication Education, 448(3), 193-210. Basow, S. A. (1998). Student evaluations: Gender bias and teaching styles. In L. H. Collins, Chrisler, J.C., & Quina, K. (Eds.), Career strategies for women in academe: Arming Athena. (pp. 135-156). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Usin Brooks, V Bennett, S. K. (1982). Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: Evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 170-179. Odubunmi, E.O. and Balogun, T.A. (1995). The attitude of some Nigerian students towards integrated science Simpson, R.D & Troost, K.M (1982). Influences of commitment and learning of science among adolescent students 763-781. Adesoji, F.A (2002).˝Modern strategies in the teaching of integrated science.’ In:Ayodele,S.O., ed Granger, C.A., Morbey, M.L., Lotherington, H., Ooston, R. D., & Wideman, H. H. (2002). Pelgrum, W. (2001).Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from aworldwide educational assessment. Computers and Education, 82(5), 569-589. Becker, H. J. (1999). Internet use by teachers: Conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use (ERIC Document Reproduction Service). Grasha, A. F. and Riechmann, S. (1996) “Grasha-Reichmann Teaching Style Inventory” [online] http://www.iats.com/publications/TSI.shtml Grasha, A Kwok, M., & Jones, C. (1995). Catering for different learning styles. ALT-J, 3 (1), 5-11. Gilbert, J., & Han, C Carver, C. A., Howard, R. A., & Lane, W. D. (1999). Enhancing Student Learning Through Hypermedia Courseware and Incorporation of Student Learning Styles. IEEE Transactions on Education, 2 (3), 33-38.