“More and better,” states Bill Mckibben ' in his national best selling book Deep Economy ' “are two birds roosting on the same branch.” Within traditional economic values these two birds could be taken out with one stone synonymously in every attempt. However, in our age of endless economic growth, expanded populations, and industrial centralization, “the greater wealth no longer make us happier.” (Mckibben, 2) Not only this, but “more” ' more money, more consumerism, more fuel ' succeeds in adding momentum to the course of environmental destruction that we, as North Americans, are responsible for putting in motion. This is the underlying metaphor…
The earth’s main resources are perpetual resources like solar energy, renewable resources like forests and fresh water, and nonrenewable resources like oil and gas. The resources can be depleted or degraded by overuse, by waste, by pollution, and by man’s increasing “ecological footprint.”…
The environmentalist, Bill McKibben, author of “Deep Economy,” argues that we are currently living through an ecological crisis. He states that the three main reasons why our environment is in a climacteric situation is because political intervention isn’t helpful, we have exceeded our resources and the things we produce are no longer making us happy. He altercates that people invest on things and construct the greatest innovations despite the fact that it no longer satisfies their needs. McKibben asserts that we have surpassed the barrier that was available for our resources which induced us to jeopardizing our future generations. However, Mckibben does not emphasize who the people are and how they individually and collectively affect the…
The tragedy of commons is when people share a common resource they tend to deplete is because of self-interest and for a short term profit.…
Ketcham’s article brings light upon the harsh truth that the world is incapable of handling itself along with the growth of human consumption. Humans are proud of their innovations in earth, but it is costing the planet. The authors of Limits affirms this when they argued that “‘The application of technological solutions alone has prolonged the period of population and industrial growth, but it has not removed the ultimate limits to that growth’" [1]. I agree with this quote. For example, in a recent article I read, scientists have figured out how to essentially “hack” a better environment— a process called solar geoengineering. Although it proved to be beneficial to the environment, the scientist asserted that there will be less incentive…
We rely on so many resources to help us advance as we continue into the future, but we are relying on them too much and it’s threatening out world. Try to imagine yourself and your life without resources, no oil, plastic, wood, etc., what could you survive without? Reading the articles, “The Curse of Water Bottles” and “Fracking Threatens Everyone” we see just which resources aren’t completely necessary. Certain resources had a period where they were the rise of mankind, but to this day they are the cause of the falling of mankind.…
There have been countless problems in the United States for a very long period of time now. Such as, decades of synchronous global growth is good news, also raised a series of complex and potentially lethal dilemmas; in 2008 the cost of barrel oil increased from twenty five/ fifty dollars to one hundred and fifty dollars, agriculture produce grew so expensive, raw materials became very rare, the cost of construction exploded from New York to Dubai to Shanghai, and Helium was in short stock around the world says Zakaria. These were just some of the problems, but they were the biggest. Except the smallest complication was the impact of world growth on natural resources and the environment. Zakaria’s tone is very informative and he explains…
In his article, The Earth Is Full, Friedman (2011) begins by stating that in recent years, first decade of 21st century, humanity encounters dangers that threaten humanity and the nature because of their unconcerned behaviors. Economic problems, high growing population rate and natural disasters compel humans to question about those recent years. The writer then moves on to the veteran Australian environmentalist-entrepreneur Paul Gilding and his book, Gilding, P. (2011) The Great Disruption: Why the climate crisis will bring on the end of shopping and the birth of a new world. New York: Bloomsbury Press. Gilding (2011) discusses how much land and water area humanity needs to produce the resources they consume and absorb their waste. According to Gilding (2011), earth is growing at a dangerous rate and points out that over-used resources and worsening ecologic environment damage to social and economic system. Friedman reports the current growth rate is 150 percent of earth’s sustainable capacity and states that excessive use of resources and too much waste that creates the problem, “The Earth Is Full.” He mentions about two loops; first, population growth and global warming push up food prices, which leads to political instability, which leads to higher oil prices, which leads to higher food prices, and so on in a insurmountable circle. Second, higher productivity means fewer jobs, which requires humans to produce more sources to create jobs. The more sources create global warming. Afterwards, the writer turns his attention to possible solutions. The solutions are discussed by giving Gilding’s eco-optimist view. In the article, also it is stated that economic systems are not changed without a crisis. Friedman (2011) states that “But don’t worry, we’re getting there.” Finally, Friedman prefers to use quotations from Gilding who say nations are heading for a crisis-driven choice and develop a new sustainable economic model slowly.…
Throughout history all over the world, humans have been searching for their own “good life”. What each person’s good life is and what it takes to attain that life differs greatly across all aspects of humanity, causing it to require much time and effort for each person to discover their concept of a good life. This makes sense because of the vast differences in beliefs, experiences, and opinions that also play a part in constructing a large gap in social and financial statuses. For every human the sacrifices and benefits that come with finding one’s good life are considered the cost it took to get there, and each cost has a different amount of an impact on a person’s journey. Finding a partner and love seems to be a common theme throughout the readings in the course, and it almost always comes at a cost of missing an important opportunity.…
Can we actually know the monetary value of someone´s life? Everyone has a different opinion about this interrogation. In the past people used to think different from how we think right now. The value of life now differs depending on the different kind of experiences people go through. We will all have different obstacles in our life, but the way we get through them and live to tell the tale is the way life should be valued for.…
Two concealed concepts are at the basis of our production system: intrinsic obsolescence and planned obsolescence of goods. The former is a direct consequence of the principle of competition and cost efficiency which it entails. Planned obsolescence on the other hand is necessary to maintain the cyclical consumption of goods and implies a breakdown of products within a certain amount of time. From this follows that product sustainability is actually inverse to economic growth. Everything is being done to enhance and to accelerate consumption. This takes place in a world where natural resources are becoming increasingly scarse and the problem of pollution is acute more than ever before. So in stead of economizing we are basically doing everything to help our own destruction. Although some national governments and plentiful civil society groups have become wary if this system, it has proven to be very hard, not to say impossible, to come up with a decent alternative, simply because this…
The problem can be attributed consumption and it is a basic process to numerous economies and the current forms of globalization the effects are not only seen in the United States, but all around the world. How we extract what we need from Mother Nature…
What is the good life and how does one achieve it? This is a question that has been brought to the attention of many philosophers over human history. It can be reasonably argued that the modern person, especially westerners, consider income to be an important part to living the good life. There is little question anymore that income and happiness are indeed correlated in some ways, but does one have to attain wealth in order to be happy, to live the good life? Can a person think of themselves as “living the good life” even though they may be of a more austere status? Does wealth even really matter at all? This paper will aim to argue the point that attaining the good life successfully has more to do with virtue ethics, specifically attaining eudaimonia, in spite of statistics that do show happiness, or unhappiness, and income can be linked, and why virtue ethics may have more bearing on a person’s perception of living the good life than economics do.…
When it comes to assigning value to human life many people decide with their emotions, especially when they are assigning value to a loved one. Currently, our society uses the human life calculator to assign value to life. I don’t believe we should use this method because it is based on how much money the person makes, if they have a spouse, and the number of children they have. I believe that the human life calculator is an imprecise way to value human life. I think our society should take into account how much the person helped society throughout their lifetime. Volunteers for hospitals, humane societies, “soup kitchen people…figure out what its called” help society a lot without getting paid for it. Teachers, “more low income jobs that help”, also help society with a low income.…
We live in a materialistic world. We can’t go anywhere without a car, and the unimaginable tragedy of going camping with no cell reception. That’s not to say our materialistic view doesn’t have it’s merits. It leads to a constant flow of inventions and technology that makes society run more efficiently. However, efficiency and technology have started to overshadow the natural world, which has nurtured the human race for thousands of years providing it with food, shelter, peace, and beauty.…