Preview

Court Case: Darling Vs. Charleston Community Hospital

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
504 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Court Case: Darling Vs. Charleston Community Hospital
There were two court cases that we were given to look at. The first court case was Darling vs. Charleston Community Hospital. According to McWay, this case was on a male football player that got injured during a game and was brought to the emergency room where they determined at the hospital that his left leg was broken and a doctor that did not have any experience with putting a cast on put the cast on wrong and then left it on for fourteen days (McWay, 2015, pg.78). I think the biggest mistake that the hospital made was allowing a doctor that did not have any experience in putting casts on put the cast on and the doctor put the cast on the leg wrong and when the cast was taken off there was dead tissue on the leg. This caused the doctor at …show more content…
Misericordia Community Hospital. According to the website casebriefs.com,”this case was on a guy that was named James Johnson who had a hip surgery done at Misericordia Community Hospital, and during the surgery Dr. Salinsky punctured the femoral nerve and artery resulted in partial paralysis.” I think that the main question to really ask about this case was did the doctor who did the surgery actually have the skills to do a hip surgery? Also, it was said on the website that Dr. Salinsky had altered his application records and was hired at this hospital (Case Briefts pg.1). I think another question to ask is how did the hospital not recognize that his application record was changed when he applied? I think that if the hospital actually looked at his application then maybe this patient could have been saved from being partially paralyzed now. The guy then sued Misericordia Community Hospital. The outcome of this court case was that the Dr.Salinsky was thoughtlessness in the way they he performed the surgery and the hospital was thoughtlessness for not looking at Dr. Salinsky’s skills to perform surgeries (Justia US Law pg.1). The biggest problem about this case was that Misericordia did not go over Dr.Salinsky file to see if he could actually perform orthopedic practices. I think that the person that is at fault for Dr. Salinsky being able to perform orthopedic practices was the administrator of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Paran Vs Rifai Case Study

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On June 4, 2009, 40 year old Kathy Pagan underwent an abdominoplasty and liposuction of the abdominal flap, at Dr. Rouchdi Rifai’s office in Jackson, MI. She experiences problems from the surgery right from the start. She had “dark-colored drainage, clots, and painful burning sensations and continued to report issues, according to her complaint, first filed in 2011.” She went to Dr. Rifai office where he cleaned the wound area without anesthesia and repeatedly prescribed ointment and pain medication. Pagan requested to be sent to a wound care specialist but that was never done. “By late July 2009, she complained of pain and the wound worsened, according to her lawsuit. The doctor deemed it infected, but still did not refer her to a specialist, the complaint states.” Approximately 8 weeks after surgery Pagan…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: At a teaching hospital, Mullins who is the plaintiff marked or ticked the section of approval form that consented to “the presence of healthcare learners”. She was assured by the attending Anaesthesiologist that she would handle the anaesthesia. However, when Mullins was unconscious during the surgery, a student (VanHoey) was allowed by the Anaesthesiologist to perform intubation. Mullins’ oesophagus was lacerated by VanHoey as it was VanHoey’s first day practicing on a live patient.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: The Plaintiff Zelma Mitchell was terminated on June 4, 1974, for alleged misconduct from the Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc. Mitchell applied for unemployment compensation benefits on June 12, 1974, she was denied these benefits finding that Mitchells act were constituted as misconduct. Being denied disqualified her for…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Briefly, the summary judgment facts of St. John v. Pope (1995) noted that Pope, who had recently undergone back pain surgery and epidural injections at Round Rock Hospital, went to the Central Texas Medical Center emergency room in San Marcos for back pain and fever. The emergency room physician, at Central Texas Medical Center, telephoned St. John, the on-call physician, who recommended Pope be referred to the Round Rock Hospital, where his surgeon was on staff. However, when Round Rock Hospital’s emergency room refused to accept Pope, he went home. The following day in a hospital in Austin, a lumbar puncture revealed Pope was suffering from meningitis, which resulted in permanent disabilities (St. John v. Pope, 1995).…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fourth physician is the brother-in-law of the Community Medical Center’s Chief Executive Officer. He simply takes advantage of his family ties with the Chief Executive officer to gain a grace period for completing his records for the sake of convince. The last two physicians, who had been left from the list Barbara explained, are simply handled with kid gloves because they tend to be general nuisances to the organization if things are not done their own way. After talking with Barbara, Maya felt it would be appropriate to share the issue to administration, assuming the senior administrators of the facility was equally as dedicated to calculating and reporting accurate statistics. Unfortunately, the Chief Executive officer says keeping the physicians happy should be priority, because without these six physicians being able to admit patients or schedule surgical procedures, the organization revenue would decrease. He also reminded her of the importance of the confidential nature of the unwritten policy to prevent other physicians from expecting similar treatment (Ethics case studies for health information management,…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hsc300 Unit 5 Assignment

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On September 27, 2016, CPT Porter, Derek came in for his appointment; however, he did not have his ID card with him. At that moment, I informed him that I could not check him in unless he has his ID card. He replied, “Even if they already know who I am”, I said “yes, even if they know who you are, I cannot check you in without your ID it is protocol”. I proceeded to inform him that if he had another form of identification he can go to medical records and get a promissory note. At which time he became upset and stated he wanted to speak to someone. I immediately, asked Major Stackhouse for assistance, I explained to him the situation and also informed CPT Porter that he had to obtain a promissory note. In addition, Major Stackhouse offered to inform the provider of the situation.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1980, patient (plaintiff) James Johnson filed suit against Misericordia Community Hospital alleging medical malpractice. The suit specifically alleged corporate negligence in the appointment of Dr. Lester V. Salinksy (independent member) to the medical staff at Misericordia Community Hospital. During the surgery, Dr. Salinsky severed the femoral artery, resulting in partial paralysis for Johnson (casebriefs.com). Ultimately, Johnson suffered a permanent paralytic condition to his right thigh muscles with resultant atrophy and weakness as well as a loss of function after undergoing hip surgery performed by Dr. Salinsky (Showalter,…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Off hand, I’m not exactly sure how this case would apply to my practice. This case mostly involved the attempted application of a legal technicality. However, a benefit to reviewing this case was the degree to which professional negligence and medical malpractice were defined under the law. The importance of understanding your professional responsibilities, not only from an ethical standpoint, but from a legal one as well cannot be overstated. For the most part, laws are designed to ensure an ethical and safe…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the dual sovereignty doctrine, is it legally permissible for two states to prosecute the same defendant for the same offense without committing Double Jeopardy?…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Anti-trust laws were established to promote and protect competition. This idea is the anti-trust law proper purpose. The purposes of the laws are not to punish big companies solely on account of their size, or to serve as an alternative set of “consumer protection” laws. The case of Oltz v. St. Peter’s Community Hospital is a different type of anti-trust case in which the hospital allowed a group of anesthesiologists from inside the facility to create an organization that directly eliminated outside competition from Mr. Oltz. The law was broken when the group of anesthesiologists banded together to drive out any form of competition, which resulted in the failure of Mr. Oltz’s business. Initially the organization of anesthesiologist from St.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early 1900s, two women came into hospitals and left with trespasses against their bodies. In the Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital case, the patient came in complaining of a stomachache and left with a hysterectomy. In the Mohr v. Williams case, a woman came in with a bad right ear and left with an operated-on left ear. While there are differences between these cases, there are more similarities; both are cases of malpractice and breach of consent, but both have specific particularities. Both cases involve a breach of consent.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whistle Blower Case Paper

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Answer: The Board of Directors or board of trustees is responsible to check doctors. According to the textbook, in chapter 16, on page 462, the Board of Directors have an ultimate responsibility for checking each medical staff’s qualification, competency, and up-to-date education (Brodnik, Rinehart-Thompson, & Reynolds, 2013). Therefore, in the Winkler County Nurse Whistleblower Case, the hospital administrator, Stan Wiley, is ultimately responsible for hiring Dr. Arafiles. During the hiring process, Stan Wiley made two…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the principles of Consequential ethics, one can see why the surgeons would come to the conclusion of performing the surgery without the patient’s explicit consent being acceptable. Given that said principle revolves around the idea of what is “intrinsically good or bad,” the surgeons did what they thought was best for the patient. However, if one were to implement the “Three-Step Ethical Decision-Making Model” from Norman Vincent Peale for solving an ethical dilemma one would have realized that this course of action is illegal thus being immoral. The surgeons could have talked her into contacting her family, or close friends, for them to discuss the issue within themselves.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Did this patient made any kind of mistake by just signing the informed consent document?…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Unknown Year, Unknown Author. HOSPITAL ERRORS. [online] Available at URL http://public.getlegal.com/legal-info-center/medical-malpractice/hospital-errors (Accessed on 26th March 2010)…

    • 15067 Words
    • 61 Pages
    Powerful Essays