Preview

Court Investor's Role In The Criminal Justice System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
728 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Court Investor's Role In The Criminal Justice System
When courtroom participants are thought of it’s generally the judge, jurors, defendant, defense attorney and prosecutor. What about the other important participants? Court administrators are key factor participants as well, such as the bailiffs, court clerk, court reporters, and witnesses. Every one of these participants plays a key role in the criminal justice system and contributes to the effectiveness of the courts existence.
The judge is a public officer who hears and decides cases in a court of law. The defendant is the person being accused of a crime and his or attorney (defense attorney) is the person fighting to pursue there innocence in a court of law. The prosecutor represents the state and is responsible for presenting all evidence
…show more content…
Sheriff Deputies, police officers may hold the position of a bailiff depending on the area or state. A bailiff is not always an employee of the courts. While a bailiff job duties are to maintain order and security in the courtroom they have to intervene when someone is being disruptive or loud in the courtroom. Sometimes they will have to get physical with people who are showing threatening behavior and then remove them from the courtroom. The bailiff is the person that escorts the defendant in and out of the courtroom for the trial proceedings. They make sure the jurors are safe throughout the proceedings and afterward walking them to their vehicles. This is important because some people get angry at the findings of the jury and attempt to intimidate or even hurt them. In the case that convicted Anthony Marshall of stealing from his legendary New York socialite mother Brooke Astor, a juror told the defense lawyer on the case that she only voted to convict the defendant because she felt threatened by the other jurors claiming that one juror came at her in a menacing way throwing up gang signs at …show more content…
The court reporter must maintain efficiency and accuracy at all times. This information is used for the appeal process so the information contained in the report must be accurate. Often during a trial the judge or attorney might say “let the record reflect that” because they want to make sure that the particular information is recorded in the transcribing of the case. Most court reporter uses stenotype typewriter and use shorthand. Other methods for recording court proceedings are audio taping and videotaping. Those two methods are both inexpensive but if a printed record is requested someone will have to then transcribe all of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    prosecutor, a state's attorney general, and as a judge on state trial and appellate courts…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Checkpoint #6 Cjs/200

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First I will start off with the one who has all the authority, the judge. The judge is the one who makes all the rules. Next is the prosecuting attorney. The prosecuting attorney may also be known as the district attorney, state’s attorney, county attorney, commonwealth attorney or solicitor. The prosecuting attorneys duty is to conduct criminal proceedings on the behalf of the state or the people against those accused. The three main roles of the prosecutor are investigating crimes, to decide whether or not to instigate legal proceedings and to appear in court. All of the duties of a prosecutor may become too much for one person to handle so they supervise a staff of assistant district attorneys who do most of the work in the courtroom. The prosecuting attorney determines which cases to pursue by the amount of evidence that they gather. If the attorney cannot find enough evidence to get a conviction then they may make the decision to drop the case. Next is the defense attorney. The defense attorney is the one who represents the one being accused of a crime. Public defenders also represents those accused of crimes, however they are state employed lawyers.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The prosecutor is accountable for exhibiting the state’s evidence as well as presenting and preparing the state’s case against the accused. It is also the prosecuting attorneys responsibility to decide which matters should be tried or not. It is the prosecutor who makes these determinations based on a several sets of criteria. Most prosecutors will study the evidence against the accused, study the crime, as well as many other factors.…

    • 279 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CJUS 330

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Judges: in state courts they are elected by the voters. Federal judges are nominated by the president. Judges are the ultimate authority figures in the courthouse. Only they can set bail, instruct jurors, and impose sentences.…

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the courtroom there is a group of key players that work together on a daily basis. They are made of a group of professionals. These professional are those who know all aspects of a criminal trial and they work together in performing the duties of the court.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    First, what is a courtroom work group? According to Schmalleger (2011) "Participants in a criminal trial can be divided into two categories: professionals and outsiders. The professionals are the official courtroom actors; they are well versed in criminal trial practice and set the stage for and conduct the business of the court. Judges, prosecuting attorneys, defense attorneys, public defenders, and others who earn a living serving the court fall into this category". Schmallerger (2011) later describes the professional courtroom actors as the "courtroom work group". The courtroom work group includes, Judges, prosecuting attorneys, defense attorneys, public defenders, bailiffs, local court administrators, court clerks, court reporters and expert witnesses. All of these people work together with one common goal, to…

    • 1388 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is a courtroom work group? “The professional courtroom actors, including judges, prosecuting attorneys, defense attorneys, public defenders, and others who earn a living serving the court.” (Pg. 312) By Frank Schmalleger 2011. From my understanding a courtroom work group is anyone who works as an employee of the court systems. This includes the bailiff, courtroom recorders, courtroom clerks and translators. During a daily basis the courtroom work group is expected to maintain interaction that serves the court and its many members. The courtroom work group is focused on bringing the case to a fair ending by communicating with each other even though there are different parties hoping for different outcomes. The reason they are able to communicate so well is because even though they support different sides of the case, they are all focused on closing the case quickly. If I was able to make changes to the courtroom work group I would like to change the allotted time each judge spends on a single case. I feel it is important that citizens understand what the judge is telling them and they feel like they are being treated with care not just being rushed through the system.…

    • 682 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper

    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A courtroom workgroup in the U.S criminal justice system is an informal arrangement between a criminal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and the judicial officer. The courtroom working group seeks to bring justice to all. It ensures that all parties are accorded due fairness and equal opportunity regardless of gender, race, age, religious affiliation nor any other factor. They also see to it that trials are completed successfully. These individuals are grouped into two categories. These are the professionals and the outsiders. Professionals are the court officers such as the judges, attorneys, public defenders, defense attorneys and court reporters. I believe that the criminal prosecutor, defense attorney, and a judicial officer make up the most common courtroom work group. The daily interaction of this group is to make sure that rules are being followed in each group. Also making sure it is given in a timely fashion. The courtroom work group needs to work in order to offer plea bargains and select jurors.…

    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antigone Mock Trial

    • 2403 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Judge (Mr. Schultz): responsible for knowing and administrating all court procedures; will establish time limits for all parties.…

    • 2403 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prosecution Vs. Defense

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A prosecutor’s primary role is that of a minister of justice, and not simply that of an advocate in guarding the rights of the accused as well as enforcing the rights of the public (Tragos, n.d.). Of course, as a minister of justice and not that of an advocate, a prosecutor possesses the power of operating with few legal constraints regarding decision making, which accounts for the use of discretion. In contrast, defense counsel represent the accused of society, the role of the defense…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The responsibilities of a judge in the criminal justice process consist of a variety of duties; no court judge have just one duty or job to complete on a daily bases. Some of these duties include determining probable cause, signing warrants, informing suspects of their rights, setting and revoking bail, arraigning defendants, and accepting guilty pleas. When a judge is not in court, most of the time, they are negotiating dispositions with prosecutors and defense attorneys. The most important responsibility is to ensure suspects and defendants are treated fairly in compliance with Due Process of Law. In a jury trial the judge is responsible for allowing the jury a fair chance to reach a verdict. Before releasing them to deliberate or discuss…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The judicial branch is responsible for overseeing the local, state, and federal court systems. It explains the meaning of the Constitution and laws passed by the legislative branch and enforced by the executive branch. Now the Supreme Court is ahead of the judicial branch because it is the highest court of the land. The Supreme Court rules if whether or not the issue itself is constitutional. (Dictionary, 2013)…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Schedule

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For my court observation, I was able to sit in a Texas State District Court. The judge of the court I observed was Honorable Judge Etta J. Mullin. Everything was pretty much what I expected to see. I wasn’t expecting anything outrageous to happen like on the television. I was expecting everything to be very professional and very boring, like watching the C-SPAN channel.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A defense attorney can either be hired by the client, or the courts can appoint one to the accused. Prosecutors are there to represent the people and that…

    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Adversary System

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The role of the judge is an important part of the adversary system. The judge’s role is to ensure a just outcome and conduct the case in accordance to the laws and regulations, and provide equal treatment to both sides. The advantage of having a judge is that it allows there is an impartial party to deliberate a fair outcome based on the cases presented. The use of an impartial decision maker is allows the public to feel more confident in the outcome of the case.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays