Preview

Courtroom Standards Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
757 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Courtroom Standards Analysis
Courtroom Standards Analysis
Chris
CJA/484
June 17, 2013

Courtroom Standards Analysis
Courtroom Personnel
There are a number of individuals who make up the courtroom personnel. Each individual whether it be the judge, bailiff, court reporter, courtroom clerk, prosecutor, defense counsel, jury, defendant, or witness contribute to the shaping of legal law. The judge who presides over the trial has the ultimate authority in the courtroom. “The judge must see that the trail is conducted in an orderly manner according to prescribed rules and laws covering the selection of the jury, the presentation of evidence, the arguments of the lawyers, the instructions to the jury, and the rending of the verdict” (Arizona Judicial Branch, 2013, para. 1). Although the judge has the ultimate authority in the courtroom the bailiff is tasked with keeping order during trial or hearings. The bailiff announces entry of the judge, supervises the jury, and calls witnesses (National Institute of Justice, 2008). The court reporter is tasked with recording all elements of the trial in short hand, including instructions to the court, testimony, and rulings. The courtroom clerk “is an officer of the court and documents what happens in a case, orders made by the court during the trial, and the verdict at the end of the trial” (Arizona Judicial Branch, 2013, para. 2). The clerk is also responsible for admitting exhibits and evidence throughout the trial. While the judge, bailiff, court reporter, and courtroom clerk ensure proper procedure through the trial, the prosecutor, defense counsel, defendant, and witnesses present the case for a verdict to be decided.
The prosecutor and plaintiff are the individuals who present a case against the defendant or accused. They must present evidence, witnesses, and testimony to the jury to prove guilt or innocence. While the prosecutor and plaintiff are against the defendant the defense counsel is representation appointed for or by the defendant



References: Arizona Judicial Branch. (2013). Jury Service Courtroom Personnel. Retrieved from http://www.azcourts.gov/juryduty/courtroompersonnel.aspx National Institute of Justice. (2008). Courtroom Personnel. Retrieved from http://www.njj.gov/training/firearms-training/module14/fir_m14_t08_02.htm G. Larry Mays,. (n.d). American courts and the judicial process . Retrieved from http://www.oup.com/us/companion.websites/9780199738854/student/chapter3

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In most courtrooms, there are groups of essential players that work together on a regular basis. They are composed of a combination of professionals. These professional are the ones which understand all phases of a criminal trial, and they all work together in fulfilling the functions of the court.…

    • 279 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cja Courtsystems

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    | |A prosecutor is an attorney who has been elected or|The prosecution plays a very important role in the |…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, he or she usually spends a substantial amount of time interviewing their customers before hearings or trials. In the event a prosecutor provides an offender a plea bargain, a defense lawyer is accountable for speaking about the deal with the offender.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This process is where witnesses are called to give their statements. They are questioned and cross examined by all lawyers/attorneys. Cross examination is being questioned by each lawyer/attorney they may ask the same questions but in different words. The prosecutor is there to make the jury believe the criminal is guilty whereas the defense attorney is there to make the jury question if the criminal is really guilty. There are also three types of witnesses which are; ordinary witnesses, expert witnesses, and character witnesses. “Ordinary witnesses can testify only as to their personal observations. Expert witnesses, on the other hand, are allowed to offer their opinions in their area of expertise. Chartacter witnesses may testify only to the general good reputation of the defendant” (Zalman,…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    3. Foreman: The Foreman is responsible for keeping the jury organized. He seems calm and neutral in the way that he does not object or counter anyone’s opinions.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The prosecutor has a very important role as a member of the courtroom workgroup. The prosecutor may also be known as the district attorney, states attorney, or the commonwealth attorney (Schmalleger, 2011). The prosecutor is responsible for making and presenting the case of the state against the accused. In their own way the prosecutor speaks on behalf of the people, for the law or laws broken by the defendant. The…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Virginia State, Jay Lentz was convicted by a jury in July 2003 for the kidnapping and murder of his wife. The jury recommended that Mr. Lentz spend life in prison; however, the United States District Judge Gerald Lee dismissed the kidnapping charge due to lack of evidence. Two weeks after the judge convicted Mr. Lentz of murder, he found evidence of prosecutorial misconduct therefore the judge ordered a new trial for the alleged murder charge.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * The author will determine courtroom groups, how the groups interact daily, and recommend changes to the groups. The author will also describe prosecutor roles and the cases he pursues. Finally, the author will elaborate on the funnel of criminal justice with the backlog among the courtroom group, the court system, give an example, and explain how to eliminate backlog cases.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antigone Mock Trial

    • 2403 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Judge (Mr. Schultz): responsible for knowing and administrating all court procedures; will establish time limits for all parties.…

    • 2403 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prosecution Vs. Defense

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A prosecutor’s primary role is that of a minister of justice, and not simply that of an advocate in guarding the rights of the accused as well as enforcing the rights of the public (Tragos, n.d.). Of course, as a minister of justice and not that of an advocate, a prosecutor possesses the power of operating with few legal constraints regarding decision making, which accounts for the use of discretion. In contrast, defense counsel represent the accused of society, the role of the defense…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The responsibilities of a judge in the criminal justice process consist of a variety of duties; no court judge have just one duty or job to complete on a daily bases. Some of these duties include determining probable cause, signing warrants, informing suspects of their rights, setting and revoking bail, arraigning defendants, and accepting guilty pleas. When a judge is not in court, most of the time, they are negotiating dispositions with prosecutors and defense attorneys. The most important responsibility is to ensure suspects and defendants are treated fairly in compliance with Due Process of Law. In a jury trial the judge is responsible for allowing the jury a fair chance to reach a verdict. Before releasing them to deliberate or discuss…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A Courtroom Workgroup in the United States criminal justice system is an informal arrangement between a criminal defense attorney, criminal prosecutor, and the judicial officer. Participants within the criminal trial are divided in two courtroom workgroups consisting of professionals and outsiders. Professionals are the courtrooms official actors; these individuals conduct court business and are well versed in the practice of criminal trials. Defense attorneys, public defenders, prosecuting attorneys, judges, and others who earn a living serving the court fall into this category.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The contemporary Anglo-American adversary system has gradually evolved, over several hundred years. Early English jury trials were unstructured proceedings in which the judge might act as inquisitor, or even prosecutor, as well as fact finder. Criminal defendants were not allowed to have counsel, to call witnesses, to conduct cross-examination, or to offer affirmative defenses. All types of evidence were allowed, and juries, although supposedly neutral and passive, were actually highly influenced by the judge's remarks and instructions. In fact, before 1670, jurors could be fined or jailed for refusing to follow a judge's directions.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Judge verbally introduces himself. As a form of introduction, the Judge then visually and verbally directs the jurors’ attention towards the court clerk, the stenographer, the court officers, and the attorneys representing the plaintiff and defendant. After introducing key players in the courtroom, the Judge gives a brief overview of how jury duty has been conducted throughout history. Rules and procedures of the court are verbally reviewed and presented to all jurors by the Judge. This communication process informs the jurors what to…

    • 2618 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ADR which is primarily concerned with taking the attention of parties from the doors of the court-room has evolved over the years from the widely-known mediation, negotiation, conciliation and arbitration. ADR processes have developed over the years. The inherent flexibilities in the system have led to a combination of processes to suit the nature of the dispute. These developing forms are referred to by many authors as hybrid resolution mechanisms. The most common processes are the mediation/arbitration or arbitration/mediation, mini-trial, summary jury trial and the early neutral evaluation (ENE), case management, renting a judge etcetera which is obtainable in the various jurisdictions around the world.…

    • 9359 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays