Crede On Grit

In Crede’s main point he criticizes recent studies on regarding GRIT and success. Crede states that Duckworth is responding to grit incorrectly because he is making it a bigger issue than it is. He is very dramatic on this topic. Grit is parallel to conscientiousness, according to psychologists who say it is not changeable, whereas Duckworth argues that grit is changeable versus Credes view who agrees with psychologists. Plus crede feels that a lot of the information is regurgitated or overused; for example, he states, "And it doesn't tell us anything that we don't already know." It may seem like Crede has the world against him but there are new studies that show similar beliefs as she. As in a new study that will be issued in the “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”. Is evidence
In short Kamenetz means crede is stating that grit is the same a predictor as other factors such as conscientiousness and agreeableness. Crede has labeled that grit is and I quote, “old wine in new bottles." Basically he is saying grit is the same as the other factors just with a different name. Crede says he would feel uncomfortable if the schools changed his daughter's personality but what if it's for the best. Crede overexaggerates making it sound like his daughter would be completely changed but in reality her work ethic would be changed.Crede’s says that GRIT is just like every other factor just with a different name which isn't true. Grit is a well known factor Duckworth’s facts and knowledge is high. Crede’s evidence is and isn't effective. One reason why, is he actually states convincing points but is he just pushing Duckworth under the bus. Also Ex. sentence frame: In her article “MacArthur 'Genius' Angela Duckworth Responds To A New Critique Of Grit,” Anya Kamenetz discusses assistant professor of psychology Marcus Crede’s assessment of grit, which he implies very