Credibility Comparison
Credibility Comparison Credibility is something that can be classified as an unavoidable aspect of interpersonal relationships. The way in which we approach situations in which credibility needs to be established and the way we carry ourselves during that processes are intrinsically determined by our competence, caring, and character. Taking into account the paramount importance of credibility in all sorts of communicative transactions in personal and professional environments, we must do our best to embrace this concept and its implications regardless of where we stand. The following, is a credibility comparison of my former and current bosses. They are two physicians for whom I worked for six years and five years respectively. Dr. Gary
…show more content…
Dr. Schwartz, had an open door communication policy; his manner of speech was eloquent and always respectful. His business and personal modus operandi denoted high ethical standards, which fostered employee morale and engagement, and established his credibility as a medical physician and as a human being, and also enable him to run a extremely profitable business. Dr. Steve Marsh, was born and raised in Hoboken, New Jersey. After practicing as a chiropractor, for over twenty years, at the age of 47 decided to go back to medical school and he became a doctor of osteopathy (D.O.). He changed his original Italian last name to Marsh, -according to him- “to be more appealing to the American culture.” As soon as he took over our practice, he made clear his authoritarian personality, as well as his political views and religious believes. We currently do not have a Code of Ethics Manual, because he thinks we “should operate based on common sense.” He constantly uses foul language at work, he easily loses his temper, and he has no regard for his patients’ time or long term medical concerns. He embraces the field of medicine as “a way to make money without working hard.” Moreover, his business operations are directed by his Machiavellian maxims, which has greatly affected his practice profitability. Besides, most of the office employees are afraid of him and due his inflexibility and close-mindedness. Lastly, his poor communication skills, speak volumes of his lack of ethical standards and questionable
Dr. Schwartz, had an open door communication policy; his manner of speech was eloquent and always respectful. His business and personal modus operandi denoted high ethical standards, which fostered employee morale and engagement, and established his credibility as a medical physician and as a human being, and also enable him to run a extremely profitable business. Dr. Steve Marsh, was born and raised in Hoboken, New Jersey. After practicing as a chiropractor, for over twenty years, at the age of 47 decided to go back to medical school and he became a doctor of osteopathy (D.O.). He changed his original Italian last name to Marsh, -according to him- “to be more appealing to the American culture.” As soon as he took over our practice, he made clear his authoritarian personality, as well as his political views and religious believes. We currently do not have a Code of Ethics Manual, because he thinks we “should operate based on common sense.” He constantly uses foul language at work, he easily loses his temper, and he has no regard for his patients’ time or long term medical concerns. He embraces the field of medicine as “a way to make money without working hard.” Moreover, his business operations are directed by his Machiavellian maxims, which has greatly affected his practice profitability. Besides, most of the office employees are afraid of him and due his inflexibility and close-mindedness. Lastly, his poor communication skills, speak volumes of his lack of ethical standards and questionable