Preview

Criminal Court Cases: The Taukitoku Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
698 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Criminal Court Cases: The Taukitoku Case
As this was a case brought up by the state of Nevada, there were criminal charges that were filed against the defendant Taukitoku, those being three counts of murder with the use of a firearm as well as four counts of assault with a deadly weapon. The murder with the use of a firearm charges against Taukitoku were brought up for the killings of Charles Kelly, Derek Jensen, and Nathaniel Viljoen with a .380 Taurus semi-automatic handgun. The four counts of assault with a deadly weapon were for the killings of the three men and pointing the gun at Annetria Scott, another woman who was attending the party. Since Taukitoku’s trial took place in a criminal court, jury unanimity was required to uphold his guilt. Similarly, the state was required to prove that the evidence of Taukitoku’s crimes were beyond a reasonable doubt, i.e., a certainty of 98%, to be convicted.
Other Possible Charges
…show more content…
Looking through the case filings and brief, there were other criminal charges that could have also been brought up against the defendant during the night of the incident. The first other charge that could have been brought up against Taukitoku is trespassing. Nevada law states that trespassing is “going upon the land or into any building of another with intent to vex or annoy the owner or occupant thereof, or to commit any unlawful act; or willfully goes or remains upon any land or in any building after having been warned by the owner or occupant thereof not to trespass” (NRS 207.200). In this case the owners of the house told the defendants and his companions to leave the property which they then refused to do. Since Taukitoku was also carrying a firearm on him he could be charged with the more grave crime of armed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The complainant pleaded guilty to possession of a pistol during the incident. A finding that the appellant and his codefendants were the aggressors is inconsistent with the fact they called the police and remained on the scene until their arrival.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chris Finish is a licensed driver who has owned his car for about six months. On the night of his arrest, he picked up Josh Kings at approximately 8:00 p.m. While double parked outside a store 24 police notice an expired inspection sticker on the defendants vehicle. the officer stopped them at approximately 10:30 p.m. After questions them for a bit the officer notices a handgun under the passenger seat. Both men denied any knowledge of the gun. The defendants lawyer moved for a directed verdict, The motion was denied, Chris is now appealing his conviction. John Kings has not been seen sense the night of the arrest.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When a case is appealed, as in Mr. Ewing’s case, other cases of like offenses and sentencing are looked at to see if any type of discrepancy or bias can be found. The cases e.g. Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U. S.957 (1991), Solem v. Helm, 463 U. S. 277(1983), and Rummel v. Estelle, 445 U. S. 263 (1980), that were selected to be part of the review process for Mr. Ewing case were similar but upon review, Mr. Ewing was found to be much more violent in his overall scope, e.g. felonies and prior offenses which included the use of weapons, and therefore, his here strikes sentence was upheld. (Ewing v. California,…

    • 3733 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Korematsu V. United States was a court case during the time of World War II. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor, people of Japanese descent were considered threats. As a result, Franklin Roosevelt issued the Executive Order 9066 on February 19, 1942. This Order demanded that each and every person of Japanese descent be moved to internment camps, regardless of citizenship. Fred Korematsu, a Japanese American citizen, refused to leave his home to go to the internment camp. Therefore, he was convicted of disobeying the law. This landmark court case was deemed unconstitutional due to the violation of Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment:…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A jury trial was held in which the jury considered both the guilt and innocence of Mrs. Clark; and the circumstances of the commission of the murder.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The prosecutor in charge was Doug Gansler, Muhammad waived his right to counsel and decided to represent himself, soon after giving his opening statement he requested his right to counsel. The prosecution decided to bring up charges including murder, conspiracy, terrorism, conspiracy, and illegal use of a firearm (Clark Prosecutor). The evidence the prosecution provided included more than 130 eye witnesses and 400 pieces of evidence that shows that Muhammad made Malvo commit the shootings. The defense argued to drop the capital punishment charge on Muhammad for lack of evidence that Muhammad pulled the trigger because the finger prints that were on the rifle belonged to Malvo. Muhammad argued that because he did not pull the trigger that killed Dean Meyer, then moved to remove the death penalty charges.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This case in Fenton, Missouri involves 17 yrs. old Christopher Simmons born in 1993. Charles Benjamin and John Tessmer were Christopher Simmons friends and accomplices. Christopher Simmons planned and committed a capital murder along with Charles Benjamin. The plan was to commit burglary and murder by breaking and entering, tying up Shirley Crook, and tossing her off a bridge. The three boys met at 2am in the morning however, Tessmer then dropped out of the plan. Simmons and Benjamin broke into Mrs. Crook's home, bound her hands and covered her eyes. They put Mrs. Crook in a minivan drove her to a state park and threw her off a bridge. Once the case was brought to trial court, the evidence was solid and overwhelming. Simmons had confessed to the murder, performed a videotaped reenactment at the crime scene, and there was testimony from John Tessmer against him that showed premeditation. After the crime Christopher discussed the plot in advance and later bragged about the crime. After 2 hours of investigation Christopher broke down and confessed. At trial the State introduced Simmons confession and the videotaped reenactment of the crime, along with testimony that Simmons discussed the crime in advance and him bragging to fellow classmates about it later. The defense called no witnesses due to the evidence and confession. The jury having returned a verdict of murder, the trial proceeded to the penalty phase. The jury returned a guilty verdict. The jury recommended a death sentence in which the trial court imposed despite Christopher not having a criminal background. The State charged Simmons with burglary, kidnaping, stealing, and murder in the first degree. Simmons was 17 at the time of the crime. He was outside the criminal jurisdiction of Missouri’s juvenile court system. Charles Benjamin and was…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A male defendant case mentioned by Phillips (2003:510) is that Dong-lu Chen, who was a Chinese immigrant to New York, battered his wife to death some weeks after discovering she was having an affair. At his trial in 1988, an expert claimed that violence against women for adultery was commonplace in the traditional Chinese culture due to the fact that the adulterous act of a woman would be seen as an enormous statin on her husband and even affect his remarriage. Therefore, the judge made their judgments that Chen was ‘driven to violence by traditional Chinese values about adultery and loss of manhood’, and convicted him of second-degree manslaughter. Issues related to the culture backgrounds of the defendants may affect the level of punishment…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those that have not been exposed to a jury trial might be rather shocked how to process works, not only in criminal matters but also in civil matters as in the case…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Garner v. Tennessee

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Tennessee statute under authority of which police officer fired fatal shot was unconstitutional because it authorized use of deadly force against apparently unarmed, non dangerous fleeing suspect;…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mckeiver V. Pennsylvania

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The case involved Joseph McKeiver, and Edward Terry, from two different charges. McKeiver was charged with robbery, larceny, and receiving stolen goods as acts of juvenile delinquency. Terry was charged with assault and battery on a police officer. The officer was breaking up a fight when Terry began hitting him with his fists and a stick. The next week, he was then charged and committed with assault on a teacher. Both juveniles were denied a jury trial, which they thought should be entitled by the U.S Constitution.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Cold Blood Essay

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Richard Eugene Hickock and Perry Smith were found guilty of murder in the first degree and their punishment is death. "Can there be a single doubt in your minds regarding the guilt in your defendants? No! Regardless of who pulled the trigger on Richard Eugene Hickock's shotgun, both men are equally guilty... penalty-death." (303)…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Please accept this letter as a complaint of employment discrimination based on gender by Alice Bennett. Please also accept this letter as an appearance by Marcia Robinson of Auburn University Legal Services on behalf of Mrs. Alice Bennett.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does notoriety affect the outcome of a criminal court proceeding? A trial’s outcome should not be based on the notoriety of it, yet it is. Due to media coverage, the length of the trial, and the notoriety of the people who committed the crime, the outcome of the trial is affected. The Manson trials and the trial of Leopold and Loeb are two prime example of how notoriety can affect a criminal court proceeding. An analysis of two criminal court proceedings, the Manson trial and the trial of Leopold and Loeb, reveals that notoriety does affect criminal court proceedings. Even though criminal court proceedings should be based on unbiased information and evidence, overall, the notoriety of the case impacts it.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Japan's Civil Law System

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages

    OKUYAMA, Dr. S., SATO, Izumi. & KASPER, A. J. (1997, October). The New Code of Civil Procedure in Japan. , (), 1-6.…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays