Preview

Critical Analysis of "Death's Waiting List"

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1081 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Critical Analysis of "Death's Waiting List"
In the article “Death’s Waiting List” Sally Satel argues that the sale of organs should be allowed in the U.S. She hopes to convince the reader that the only guarantee of getting a transplant is to skip the wait list and just buy one. Although Satel makes a good argument she seems very biased and provides biased evidence to support her claims. Satel claims that there is a problem with organ donations. In order to prove this she begins her argument by stating that the wait for a kidney in a big city, “is five to eight years and expected to double by 2010.”(2) Well, it is now 2012 and it still takes the same amount of time to get a kidney transplant. The time did not double like Satel claimed it would. As a matter a fact according to the U.S department of Health & Human Services only 11,329 people have to wait 5 or more years for a kidney transplant. This number is way less than the 70,000 Satel lead the reader to believe. The statistic evidence which satel provides seems legitimate but the assumptions she makes because of them do not quite add up.
Satel then provides us with her story to show that there is in fact a problem. What she does not realize is that her argument is categorized as biased. Of course she thinks waiting for a transplant takes too long, if she’s been in the same position before. Her attitude towards donors does not help either. She wishes donors bodies were like Sears catalogs. Really? She then contradicts herself by saying it took her 1 year to get a kidney transplant. Whatever happened to 5-8 years? Where is satel from? and why does she get her organ transplant 5-8 times faster than someone living in a big city? A little more explanation of this could have saved this piece of evidence, but it probably would have benefit her argument more if she would’ve just left this part out.
Satel sets the tone to her argument as concerned and assertive. She makes her argument seem as if it’s right and the U.S. government is wrong. She puts all the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    While reading the Organ Sales Will Save Lives article by Joanna MacKay the main claim I felt would have to be in the beginning of the first paragraph where she stated that “governments should not ban the sale of human organs; they should regulate it. Lives should not be wasted; they should be saved”. This part basically explains what the problem is that she is trying to get an answer to which is that more people should be saved from consistently dying because of kidney problems and the government should reconsider the banishment of the sales of human organs. The sub-claim that supports the main claim would be when she refers to the 350,000 people that suffer from the ending stage of the renal disease which causes the organs to stop functioning…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Organs For Sale Summary

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Organs for Sale” is an argument written in response to the on-going ethical debate of a market-based incentive program to meet the rising demands of organ transplants. With many on the waiting list for new organs and few organs being offered, the author, Sally Satel, urges for legalization of payment to organ donors. Once in need of a new kidney herself, Sally writes of the anguish she encountered while facing three days a week on dialysis and the long wait on the UNOS list with no prospective willing donors in sight. She goes on to list several saddening researched facts on dialysis patients survival rates, length of time on the UNOS wait list, and registered as well as deceased donor numbers. While Sally is…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first paper appoints the issue of not legalizing the payment of donating organs. The National Kidney Foundation does not believe that the payment for organ donating will increase donations. The foundation wants to remain committed to helping people with donations. They believe that if it is legalized then disadvantaged citizens would take advantage of this opportunity that should only be done for the great feeling of it, and not the money. Sally Satel believes that organ trafficking should be stopped by legalizing some type of donor rewards. Satel believes that if legalized then people would give more kidneys or any other organ to help people on the waiting list. She also believes that certain incentives should be given and not just straight cash. Some of those incentives are; income tax credit, tuition vouchers for ones children, and a contribution to a retirement fund that would not be able to be touched until a certain age.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He states many convincing factors such as; when we give our organs we are able to give people another chance at life. One of his rebuttals to people who think organs should not be sold is that in a way we already sell them, he states that they are indirectly sold because the coast of organ transplant surgery is so expensive; the transplant centers as well as the doctors are the ones that are making the profit not the person giving the organ. He also argues that if it were to come to giving…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anthony Gregory Analysis

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gregory uses the opinions of Nadl Hakin to further justify the use of illegal transplant surgeries. In conclusion, Gregory only used ethos to a minimal degree. This so he can make room for easily fact-checked logic and credibility to support his…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Each day, an average of 79 people receive organ transplants. However, an average of 21 people die each day waiting for transplants that can't take place because of the shortage of donated organs” (The Need Is Real). There are many different views of the pros and cons that make up transplants of all kinds, from organ to bone transplants, and whether or not they should be allowed to be continued.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compensating donors for organ donations is one of the most controversial debates we have today. The shortage of organ donations in America is the one of the main reason there is a sudden drive to supplement the possible sources of organs. It first began with the move from donations of organs from cadaver to donations from living donors, and no the debate is rerisen, to the possibility of building a market for organ donations with a financial incentive.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The waiting list for patients in need of organs is growing daily. It is shocking to find that “As of April 13, 2011, there were 110,758 individuals on the waiting list for an organ transplant in the United States” (Cotter, 2011, para 1). This waiting list can be greatly diminished by changing the way we donate and initiating automatic opt-in laws.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    resume

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    3.Quotation from the essay w/Parenthetical Reference- Satel says, "If we really want to increase the supply of organs, we need to try incentives- financial and otherwise." (129. Par. 6) Here in this statement Satel uses logic to prove that if people are given something they would enjoy, In return they will become an organ donor. "Many transplant experts recognize this, proposing initiatives that would allow people to give their organs in exchange for tax breaks , guaranteed health insurance, college scholarships for their children, deposits in their retirement accounts, and so on... the Presidents Council on Bloethics and others, have begun discussing the virtues of such incentives." (129. Par.7) This evidence proves that the Auther is not the only person who thinks incentives should be given and if enough people think there should be initiatives, then it may happen.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Signing up to be an organ donor is one of the most generous things you can do — especially when you consider that a single donor can potentially save eight lives. That’s eight people who won’t have to spend agonizing months or years on the transplant waiting list, who will get a second chance, because you made the selfless decision to be a donor. More than 120,000 men, women and children currently need lifesaving organ transplants. Every 10 minutes another name is added to the national organ transplant waiting list. An average of 18 people die each day from the lack of available organs for transplant. In 2012, there were 14,013 Organ Donors resulting in 28,052 organ transplants. In 2012, more than 46,000 corneas were transplanted. More than 1…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “When it comes to healthcare, ‘bad people’ are as equal as the rest of us” (646). When someone is sentenced to execution it is decided by the criminal justice system, not the medical community. The justice system views these peoples’ social worth as so low that they deserve to die for the crimes they have committed. “The state’s determination of social worth only finds that the condemned prisoner no longer deserves life—a far higher bar than a determination that he or she is no longer worthy of healthcare prior to death”(646). In the medical community, the goal is to save lives. Appel also points out that even though kidney transplants do increase survival rates over dialysis, just because someone doesn’t get a transplant, this does not necessarily mean that they will die. He says that kidney transplants tend to be more of a life-enhancing surgery, as opposed to a life-extending surgery. On the argument that to give a kidney to someone who will die soon anyway is a waste of a perfectly good organ; Appel says this objection is invalid. A small percentage of death row inmates are ever actually executed, seventy-five percent of death sentences are appealed and overturned and that one in fifteen death row inmates is acquitted. Because of these statistics, Appel says that to ignore these peoples’ requests for kidney transplant would be morally wrong.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Organ Donation

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There’s a growing gap between the supply and demand of the organs needed and the people who are donating is growing.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    a. The list for waiting a transplant is way to high. The more people to donate their…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    National Kidney Foundation

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The National Kidney Foundation states that every fourteen minutes a new person is added to the kidney transplant list. In addition to the horrifying number of patients that are added every day, the National Kidney Foundation also state that on average 13 people die everyday while waiting to be selected from a list containing more than a ninety thousand other patients in the United States. In order to maintain control on this epidemic the United Network for Organ Sharing or UNOS has created and manages this waiting list. Each patient is prioritized on the list by various factors such as age, life expectancy, blood type, etc. On average a patient can wait three to five years on the list, however through research I have discovered that this wait…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intro: Imagine having to wait for something you really want. Could you do it, even if it took months or even years? Now imagine that it was something you literally couldn’t live without. Over 100 thousand people in the United States alone are waiting and have been waiting for organ donations that can save their lives.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays