Critical Thinking Assignment
08/30/12
08/30/12
I know absolutely nothing about the author. I expect the text to be hard because the chair of the department of English at the University of North Florida would be good at English. 2. I am hoping to observe the author’s point of view and what he is trying to show the readers, if the text is hard to understand I will read it over and over again until I can understand it or at least get a general idea of the text. 1. The text is realistic, it has a lot of evidence and examples to support the idea 2. The text represents itself in a very scientific based way. The evidences provided make it trustable 3. The story doesn’t introduce any characters. 4. There is no particular setting, time, or place for …show more content…
the story 5. The story begins with a brief introduction to the topic it then moves on talk about the different types of judgment which are reflective judgment, non-reflective and Quasi-reflective reasoning. The text talk about those different type of thinking, how they develop, and explains them to the reader with providing examples. It later describes the methods of analyzing texts 6. The text doesn’t provide a resolution, it asks questions at the end that makes the reader think about even after finishing the chapter 7.
The text doesn’t use much symbols or metaphors. It sticks to pure clear facts to help the reader understand 8. It develops how complicated the idea of thinking really is rather than simple. It shows the different types of thinking and how they differ from each other
9. The text is not poetic. It doesn’t use much metaphors, symbols, descriptive images or any notable poetic styles 1. The text show simplicity when reading, the text organizes its ideas under categories, for example certain ideas are shown under reflective judgment. The text stays at the same voice throughout it. It is significant how the text ends with questions that keep the reader thinking after closing the book. The principle of organization, simplicity, and based on clear examples governs the text’s form. Rereading the text gives more assurance and belief in the ideas provided. It is significant how the text changes the general belief of people on thinking. This easy and common act isn’t as simple as people think. 2. There wasn’t any true characters in the text 3. The content the text provided did match the form of it. The content had many examples and explanations. It showed the different types of thinking the author uses in his
writing 4. The text has a social effect. It questions the way of thinking and believing. It scientifically explains the simple act of thinking which makes it interesting and more complicated than believed. 5. The text is realistic and raises intellectual challenges because it shows how complex thinking is. The text raises interest on thinking and the human brain and its complexity. The text taught me, the reader, that thinks aren’t as easy as they seem or as we think they are.
08/30/12
I know absolutely nothing about the author. I expect the text to be hard because the chair of the department of English at the University of North Florida would be good at English. 2. I am hoping to observe the author’s point of view and what he is trying to show the readers, if the text is hard to understand I will read it over and over again until I can understand it or at least get a general idea of the text. 1. The text is realistic, it has a lot of evidence and examples to support the idea 2. The text represents itself in a very scientific based way. The evidences provided make it trustable 3. The story doesn’t introduce any characters. 4. There is no particular setting, time, or place for …show more content…
the story 5. The story begins with a brief introduction to the topic it then moves on talk about the different types of judgment which are reflective judgment, non-reflective and Quasi-reflective reasoning. The text talk about those different type of thinking, how they develop, and explains them to the reader with providing examples. It later describes the methods of analyzing texts 6. The text doesn’t provide a resolution, it asks questions at the end that makes the reader think about even after finishing the chapter 7.
The text doesn’t use much symbols or metaphors. It sticks to pure clear facts to help the reader understand 8. It develops how complicated the idea of thinking really is rather than simple. It shows the different types of thinking and how they differ from each other
9. The text is not poetic. It doesn’t use much metaphors, symbols, descriptive images or any notable poetic styles 1. The text show simplicity when reading, the text organizes its ideas under categories, for example certain ideas are shown under reflective judgment. The text stays at the same voice throughout it. It is significant how the text ends with questions that keep the reader thinking after closing the book. The principle of organization, simplicity, and based on clear examples governs the text’s form. Rereading the text gives more assurance and belief in the ideas provided. It is significant how the text changes the general belief of people on thinking. This easy and common act isn’t as simple as people think. 2. There wasn’t any true characters in the text 3. The content the text provided did match the form of it. The content had many examples and explanations. It showed the different types of thinking the author uses in his
writing 4. The text has a social effect. It questions the way of thinking and believing. It scientifically explains the simple act of thinking which makes it interesting and more complicated than believed. 5. The text is realistic and raises intellectual challenges because it shows how complex thinking is. The text raises interest on thinking and the human brain and its complexity. The text taught me, the reader, that thinks aren’t as easy as they seem or as we think they are.