Preview

Current Affairs Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
628 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Current Affairs Analysis
Current Affairs Analysis #2
Zhazira Zhalgasbayeva
Due October 11, 2013

Iran is publicly known to have been developing its nuclear program since 2002. Despite the assurances by Iranian policymakers of energy production intentions, international community – mainly US and Europe – remains skeptical about the true aims of Iran’s searches for nuclear capability. Continuous inspections of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) followed by numerous resolutions and economic sanctions imposed by US and allies haven’t to day been successful in halting country’s enrichment program. However, with a newly elected president Hassan Rouhani, some argue, the situation might move in a new direction, since he expressed the long missing willingness of Iran to negotiate on its nuclear program with US in particular.
On UN General Assembly meeting that was held recently Mr Rouhani “called for stricter controls on nuclear weapons as part of a global effort to eventually rid the world of them” (2013). “No nation should possess nuclear weapons; since there are no right hands for these wrong weapons,” – the article in the BBC News website sites (2013). Nevertheless these statements are ambiguous and do not indicate whether Iran is really planning on shutting down its nuclear development program or is it covering up the nuclear arms acquisition process at home by pretending to adhere to non-proliferation principles internationally.
Though the authenticity of Iran’s political intentions and the nature of the nuclear development program itself is the matter of debate, the reasoning strategies of Iranian officials for both proliferation and non-proliferation can be argued to go in line with Sagan’s norms model. In “Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons?” Sagan presents three theoretical frameworks for states proliferation actions – the security model, the domestic politics model and the norms model. The third can though be applicable for both proliferation and non-proliferation



References: “Iran nuclear programme: US and China call for response”, BBC News, 26 September, 2013. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-24286548 Sagan, Scott D. 1996-1997. “Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons?: Three Models in Search of a Bomb”. International Security 21 (3).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Using These four passages and our on knowledge, assess the view that the Roman Catholics were a serious threat to Elizabeth I and the church she had established.…

    • 2682 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pf con case

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Subpoint A – Nuclear proliferation is an action fueled by fear and if there is increase in military force interference, that fear will be legitimized. According to the article “Why Countries Build Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century” by Zachary Keck, “Iran’s nuclear program is better explained, then, by the rise in the potential conventional threat the U.S. poses to the Iran.” As many countries are, Iran was obviously intimidated by the massive military force of the U.S. and made the decision to begin proliferating nuclear weapons. And if the U.S. uses military force as an act to prevent nuclear proliferation, that goal may not be fulfilled.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hoomad M. (2012). Iran Cannot be Stopped with Sanctions Retrieved on February 22nd 2014 from…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ki-Moon Pros And Cons

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Just recently, politicians in the United States praised the treaty with Iran, but the public found many issues with it. Such as, the twenty-four-hour warning on when they are to make "surprise visits" to the Iranian nuclear facilities (Brookhiser). Furthering the American and Iranian tension, Iran's greatest leaders are now struggling to approach how they are going to make a peace treaty with their great enemy. "We have announced that we will not negotiate with the Americans on any issue other than the nuclear case," Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader said, "prepare for the continuation of the fight against America” (Erdbrink). Iran announces that it will only make deals with the United States on nuclear weapons in the hope of it leading to a friendlier relationship between Iran and other countries…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For most Americans, the story begins in 1979 with the Iranian Hostage Crisis, when a group of revolutionary university students took over the American Embassy in Tehran, Iran, and held 52 American diplomats, intelligence officers and Marines hostage for 444 days. But for most Iranians, and to fully understand the repercussions of this aforementioned event, the story begins almost three decades prior, in 1953. This was the year that the United States overthrew the recently established democracy in Iran, led by Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh. He had become very popular in the country for having the ambition to finally take advantage of the wealth that Iran needed to grow by nationalizing his country’s oil supply, which was for the previous 50 years under the control of the British Petroleum company. By proving that Mossadegh’s regime was relying on the communist party of Iran for power, and in turn not wanting to lose Iran as an ally in the Cold War against the Soviet Union, England was able to persuade the U.S. to assist in engineering a coup d’état against the new Iranian democracy and return Iran to its previous Pahlavi dynasty. Through what was named “Operation Ajax”, the CIA and MI6 reinstalled the Shah and instituted a pro-U.S. dictatorship of Iran that was willing to comply to Western interests in regards to the vast oil supply that the “British and American corporations had controlled the bulk of almost since their discovery” 1.…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: Squassoni, S. (20 JUL 2006). Iran 's Nuclear Program: Recent Developments. Washington, D.C.: LIBRARY OF CONGRESS WASHINGTON DC CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE.…

    • 3654 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bakhash, Shaul, and Robin Wright. “The U.S. and Iran: An Offer They Can’t Refuse?” Foreign Policy, no. 108 (1997): 124-137. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1149094.…

    • 7054 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the story of By the River, the author relates the love story between the young woman, Crystal Styan, and her husband, Jim Styan, in the terms of faith, responsibility and dream. After reading this story, I wonder that why Jim chose to leave and why Crystal still believed he will come back, even though she realized that her dream of the life with him would not come true.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pessimists argue that the growth of nuclear weapon states will most likely lead to a complex international setting with dangerously unstable tensions between states. Even a simple ignition of a single state can lead to a chain reaction of nuclear attacks ultimately leading to an all-out nuclear world war. I disagree with this claim because no responsible state will launch a nuclear attack against a state possessing nuclear weapons knowing that it will face an immediate nuclear counter threat by the targeted state and its…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Sanger, David E., Baker, Peter. “Obama Limits When U.S. Would Use Nuclear Arms”. The New York Times. The New York Times Company, April 5, 2010. Web. January 23, 2014.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lettow, Paul Vorbeck. 2010 Strengthening the nuclear nonproliferation regime. New York Council on forgein Relations. Print…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Before I go any farther, I want to preface my paper with a disclaimer or two. First, I personally do not believe that Iran, as it currently stands, should be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. Iran’s rulers are religious extremists, and they pose a serious threat to the western world. However, I will strive to present an unbiased review of the issue. Secondly, this paper is not meant to be an exhaustive examination of the topic of Iran’s nuclear weapons program. I am a college freshman at the University of Alaska Anchorage, and I wrote this paper for my English 111 class. As such, I had a very limited time period in which I could research Iran and nuclear…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    iran nuclear deal

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages

    summarized the deal as: "This deal means that we agree that it is necessary to…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The concern of weapons of mass destruction is perhaps one of the largest growing issues in the world today. These weapons are a threat to everyone; actually, they are a threat to the existence of the world, and it is for this simple reason, why there is concern regarding this topic all over the globe. " [The threat of weapons of mass destruction is] A Damocles sword poised on the neck of the human race, the magnitude of the threat they pose cannot be overstated" (Sid-Ahmed, 1). It is for this reason efforts are being made to ban the use of and/or destroy weapons of mass destruction all over the world. The question is, will the prohibition and destruction of weapons benefit the world or will it put us at a disadvantage?…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay On Iran

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Iran, a beautiful country, is like a rose; it has it’s thorns. One of these major thorns is the fact that they have nuclear power and could be planning on using it to attack the west or even their neighbors. That is why the United States proposed a deal with iran, the deal is to release sanctions on them and in turn they will only be able to make low grade uranium. The united states should push for the Iran deal because iran has the resources and knowledge to make a nuclear bomb and , the US believes it is in the worlds best interest to block iran from making this weapon, and come to agreements about their future.…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays