Because of low pay, writing pedagogy receives short shrift in graduate programs and in professional development. Professors tend to see writing as one that some people are born to do and others are not. When we see assume that some students can't write, we overlook inequities in resources and preparation. While overlooking the fact people that can write tend to be privileged graduates of elite public and private schools, clustered in colleges and universities that value the liberal arts. Professors suggest that some students aren’t served by the essay, signing off on a tiered class system where some students get the good stuff while others are spared the task of having to think hard. The third issue that affects students writing and learning is affinity, often students who can't write, can write quite well if they’re taught in way that make sense to them. That means understanding essay writing as an analytical act that involves starting with something in a text that they don't already understand or know. For example, Try to figure out what's going on in the text, coming to conclusion, and finally sharing their discoveries with…
Kerri – Lee Krause, Sandra Bochner, Sue Duchesne, Anne Mcmaugh, (2010). Educational psychology for learning and teaching third edition.…
Aside from English majors, and possibly some of them as well, writing is poorly trained across all levels of academia. However, I’m going to focus on an area where I have the most experience, the Professional Military Education (PME) system. When looking at our current process for educating Army officers, we see institutional challenges in the approach with regards to teaching both writing and critical thinking skills. In his article, Education for Critical Thinking, Colonel Williams discusses that while our schools profess to teaching officers how to think, not what to think, that is not entirely…
In the article, “Why So Many College Students Are Lousy at Writing--And How Mr. Miyagi Can Help," John Maguire gives his views to the Washington Post. John Maguire’s goal of this article is to change the audience’s mind and have them take action. Maguire would like to see the curriculum changed to starting with basic writing behaviors one at a time. Along with doing that, they should also implement courses, where they assume students know nothing about writing and work their way up from there. Throughout the article, he repeats that professors assume college students know how to properly write a paper, while in fact, they don’t know how to write a proper sentence. Maguire also states that professors or their teaching assistants need to “trick”…
The writing Revolution is written by Peg Tyre, who is the director of strategy at the Edwin Gould Foundation. He describes an education reform the occurred at Dorp High School, a school which otherwise may have been closed due to poor academic performance. The school's leader, Deirdre DeAngelis, drastically reformed the school’s curriculum and teaching methodology. The faculty, using DeAngelis’ methods, achieved significant success in improving their student’s academic achievements. They did so by focusing on the fundamentals: analytical and structured writing. In the article, Tyre describes the case of a student, Monica DiBella, who has trouble at fundamental reading and writing, to the point where she is incapable of writing an essay. After learning with the reformed curriculum that DeAngelis introduced, Monica’s weak language skills are overcome and she graduates with scores typical of college bound students. Tyre uses his description of the revolution at Dorp High School as testimony of how the reforms have improved students’ writing aptitudes as well as overall academic performance. In addition, he notes that teachers and administrators at other institutions have also reflected and explored DeAngelis’ teaching methodology. In describing the teaching revolution seen at Drop High school and its success, Tyre suggests that perhaps certain instructional fundamentals—fundamentals that schools have devalued or forgotten—need to be rediscovered, updated, and reintroduced (page 3).…
Donald M. Murray writes that there is a big difference when it comes to students writing for their classroom and professional writers finishing a first draft. First of all, professional writers do write as their job, and they know that their first draft will go through many edits before it is published. Some may even give their first draft but not even be accepted or published at all. In this case, if a writer’s draft of a book or essay is not even accepted, that person then must then come up with new ideas or come up with a new edit of their own before sending back a first draft again. The purpose of a writer is to keep on writing and always improving. As for students, they may not even be majoring in English or writing itself. They might…
Slavin, R. E. (2009). Educational Psychology. In R. E. Slavin, Educational Psychology (pp. 30-44). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.…
Johnson, J. A., Musial, D., Halle, G. E., Gollnick, D. M., & Dupuis, V. L. (2005). Introduction to the foundations of American education (13th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.…
References: Johnson, J. A., Musial, D., & Hall, G. E. (2005). Introduction to the Foundations of American Education (13th ed.). Retrieved from The University of Phoenix eBook Collection database.…
Hillocks, G. (2002). The testing trap: How state writing assessments control learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.…
I had grown weary of the constraints typical of a traditional educational model: testing, excessive quantitative assessment of teacher productivity and student learning, and the Orwellian language of the system (students as “FTEs”, our learning goals as “course objectives”, and student growth as “measurable outcomes”). And I could no longer bear the tensions that my unreasonable workload created in my relationship with my family, nor the resentment that grades created in my relationships with my students. In my ideal classroom, I thought, everyone present would understand that learning is inherently valuable; that study happens not because there is a test to pass at some point in the future, but because our minds are curious; and that discussion and participation is essential not because there are “points” attached to it, but because it is through thoughtful engagement with other minds that our own minds stretch and develop. This is what I believed as a devotee of the liberal arts, as a thinker and writer and reader, as a life-long student and teacher. Why weren’t the educational institutions in which I had taught on board with that philosophy? Wasn’t my deep faith in those truths the reason I had begun teaching in the first place? And if I was alone in that faith, could I honestly keep teaching in a system that practiced education so wildly…
The pressure of succeeding in school is always bearing in a student's mind. Schools today utilize standardized testing to determine whether a student is promoted. For instance, ACT and SAT are examples of how educators view a student’s ability. With that being said, the majority of a student's diligent work is dedicated to one evaluation on a test. In some classes, a majority of classroom instruction is centered around testing. A standardized test score should not hinder a student from furthering their education. Use of standardized testing is not an effective measure of a student’s ability.…
Young, Art and Toby Fulwiler. “The Enimies of Writing Across the Curriculum.” Programs that Work: Models and Methods for Writing Across the Curriculum. Eds. Toby Fulwiler and Art Young. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Boynton/Cook, 1990. 287-294.…
Kopke, Lisa K. Hawkins, Gary A. Troia, and Natalie G. Olinghouse inform teachers about the role of writing in Common Core curriculum and offer advice for its implementation. They first highlight the importance of writing in relation to professional success, and discuss the current lack of students with passable writing skills, observing that Common Core does not sufficiently emphasize writing. The authors next provide strategies to remedy this problem, and close by stressing that they hope the Common Core is not perceived as difficulty but as an opportunity for professional development. The authors’ emphasis on students’ writing skills in relation to Common Core requirements engages the readers’ sympathy with their dilemma. Mo et. all base their suggestions on the ideas, work, and research of many researchers and scholars before them, lending credibility to their article. Before reading this article, I had no idea Common Core’s minimum requirements barely address things like peer reviews and keyboarding, and cursive. I now have a better understanding of the effects of Common Core on English classes, and am left wondering how other subjects are…
Rollin, S. A., Subotnik, R. F., Bassford, M., & Smulson, J. (2008). Bringing psychological science to the forefront of educational policy: Collaborative efforts of the American Psychological Association’s coalition for psychology in the schools and education. Psychology in the Schools, 45(3), 194–205.…