Picture A. The scopes trial- A high school teacher by the name of John Thomas Scopes was charged and fined because he had started teaching his students of evolution theory. By teaching evolution theory, the idea that mankind had descended from apes and evolved throughout time, he was therefore denying the biblical stories of creationism. It doesn’t seem like a big deal at all except that at this time the Butlers Act was taking place which forbid exactly was Mr. scopes taught.…
With a history of taking on difficult cases, he took on the Scopes Trail. A Man By the name John T. Scopes was in violation of Tennessee's Anti- Evolution Statue.…
While many view the Scope’s Trial as merely a debate between creationists and evolutionists, it is far more complex than that. It has helped to reinforce stereotypes of both sides, shape how man is viewed, and led to a number of alterations in social and educational spheres. After the Butler Act was passed, the UCLA attempted to recruit teachers to take it to court in the hopes they would finally get their big break. A few citizens in Dayton Tennessee saw an advertisement in a newspaper and decided it would be a good way to gain some publicity for the small town. They asked all of the local Biology teachers, but could not find anyone willing to go to court. Then, they found John Scopes. John Scopes was a football coach who taught general science, who just happened to have filled in for a biology teacher for two weeks. They were able to convince him to go to court, and thus Dayton was put on the map.…
The Scopes Trial: John Scopes- high school teacher who teaches evolution in school. He was arrested, tried, and convicted. Conviction was overturned and fine went away. “Scopes Monkey Trial” play based on this event. This was a gov’t set up, test case for schools to teach evolution.…
We the defense, believe our client is innocent. Why you might ask, becuase no law was ever broken.According to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, part of the Bill of Rights, prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion and what does this The Butler Act do? It outlawed in state-funded schools, including universities, the teaching of "any theory that denies the story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible." So John T. Scope never broke a law. The one who should be here instead is Austin Peay for signing a piece of state legislation that was violating the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The first amedment granted freedom of expression giving Scopes the right to teach evolution and also granted freedom of religion giving Scopes the right to believe in anything he wants. The state requires teachers to use a textbook, Hunter's Civic Biology, which explicitly describes and endorses the theory of evolution, and that teachers were therefore effectively requires Scope to break the law.…
There were several people involved in the trial. They included John Scopes, William Jennings Bryan, and Clarence Darrow. They each played a very important role in the trial.…
The Scopes Trial was the Tennessee legal case involving the teaching of evolution in public schools. A statute was passed (Mar., 1925) in Tennessee that prohibited the teaching in public schools of theories contrary to accepted interpretation of the biblical account of human creation. John T. Scopes, a biology teacher, was tried (July, 1925) for teaching Darwinism in a Dayton, Tenn., public school. Clarence Darrow was one of Scopes's attorneys. Darrow argued that academic freedom was being violated and claimed that the legislature had indicated a religious preference, violating the separation of church and state. He also maintained that the evolutionary theory was consistent with certain interpretations of the Bible, and in an especially dramatic session he sharply questioned Bryan on the latter's literal interpretation. Scopes was convicted, partly because of the defense, which refused to plead any of the technical defenses available, fearing an acquittal on a technical rather than a constitutional basis. Scopes was, however, later released by the state supreme court on a technicality. Although the outcry over the case tended to discourage enactment of similar legislation in other states, the law was not repealed until 1967. William Jennings Bryan, three-time Democratic candidate for President and a populist, led a Fundamentalist crusade to banish Darwin's theory of evolution from American classrooms. Bryan's motivation for mounting the crusade is unclear. It is possible that Bryan, who cared deeply about equality, worried that Darwin's theories were being used by supporters of a growing eugenics movement that was advocating sterilization of "inferior stock." More likely, the Great Commoner came to his cause both out a concern that the teaching of evolution would undermine traditional values he had long supported and because he had a compelling desire to remain in the public spotlight--a spotlight he had occupied since his famous "Cross of Gold" speech at the…
Religion was perhaps the biggest source of this tension in America. The most prominent of this conflict was that between fundamentalists, who interpreted the Bible literally, and modernists who were more readily willing to interpret the Bible more flexibly. The most notable of these conflicts was undoubtedly the Scopes Trial, in which high school biology teacher, John Scopes, was arrested for teaching the theory of evolution, rather than the bible. Document C shows Scope’s attorney, Clarence Darrow, skillfully cross-examining prosecutor and Bible expert, William Jennings Bryan. Darrow's cross-examination forced Bryan to explicitly state the incredible inflexibility and rigidity of fundamentalist beliefs. As a result of the trial, which was broadcast across the nation via radio and newspaper, many Americans were more readily willing to consider modernist religious interpretations. Another example of this fundamentalist idea was the WCTU's arguments against smoking, which is shown in Document G. Although the content of their message is unsurprising, the fact that the religious organization relied upon scientific evidence for its appeal represents the growing respect for science, even in religious circles. Other conflicts, however, also arose within religion. Aimee Semple Macpherson was simultaneously revered and criticized for her superficial, glamorous religious services, as detailed in part by Document I. Predictably, conservative religious groups condemned her non-traditional…
of Education. The case ended up making it all the way to the supreme court where…
Jennings-Bryan was the seemingly perfect candidate for the fundamentalist lawyer, as his devout faith and good political campaigns gave him the nickname “The Great Commoner”. This case would become the capstone of his very prestigious career, and serve as a structural backbone for his previous views on evolution which were illustrated by his participation in the World Christian Fundamentals Association, and having quotes such as “the (evolution) most paralyzing influence with which civilizations has had to deal with in the last century,… promulgated a philosophy that condemned democracy,… denounced christianity,… denied the existence of god, overturned all concepts of morality,... and endeavored to substitute the worship of the superhuman for the worship of Jehovah.” which he told the World Brotherhood Congress. The evidence was clear that Jennings-Bryan was obviously a devout Christian, and a complete opponent to the theory of evolution and anything it stood…
The trial began in the city of Dayton. The Scopes Trial was the biggest event for the argument between Creation and Evolution. William Jennings Bryan was the defender of Creation when the Scopes Trial had started. The trial had taken place at the Rhea County Courthouse. The trial began on Friday July 10 and the jury had…
There were people who believed in teaching evolution and on the opposite side were anti-evolution. The case was about Scopes, but Scopes played a little part in the trial, the trial basically turned into a circus. Darrow was questioning Bryan on his beliefs.…
The Scopes Trial is one of the most known trials in American history. It is one of the most known because it is the perfect example of the conflict between science and religion. In the summer of 1925, a high school biology teacher named John Scopes was on trial in Dayton, Tennessee for violating the law against the teaching of evolution. The prosecutor was a very famous attorney named William Jennings Bryan, who was a three-time Democratic presidential nominee. Clarence Darrow, who was agnostic, represented the defense. The American Civil Liberties Union had newspaper advertisements offering to defend anyone who violated the law. George Rappelyea, a Dayton booster, realized that the town would get an enormous amount of attention if a teacher…
Of course, Jesus single handedly refuted Darwinism at the Creation, as "I am:" reinforced at Sinai in divine law.…
The Scopes Trial was the debate that sparked the controversy between permitting the teachings of evolution in schools. According to H. L. Mencken, Dayton was a strictly a Christian community and the values there would not be shifted. The Scopes Trial presented a perfect opportunity for Dayton to be recognized by the public. The famous lawyer Clarence Darrow pressured the stand but nothing he could do work. Dayton was determined to cling to their faith. One on the occurrence, Clarence Darrow brought a Biblical expert to the stand and questioned him on the truths of the Bible. He repeatedly showed the uneasiness behind the truths of the Bible, but nonetheless the people Dayton did not let up. They did not allow that to shake their faith if anything they felt a greater need to cling to it. According to…