Cited: Tey, Josephine. The Daughter of Time. New York City: Simon & Schuster New York, 1995. Print.
Cited: Tey, Josephine. The Daughter of Time. New York City: Simon & Schuster New York, 1995. Print.
sure that the bones actually belong to King Richard. Who is to make the decision that the bones are truly his though? Without all of the evidence supporting positive, who is to know?…
The comparative analysis of Shakespeare’s “Richard III” circa 1591 and Al Pacino’s 1996 docudrama “Looking for Richard” (LFR) reveals the capacity of these texts to transcend their timeframes due to their exploration of ideas perennially relevant to human nature. As humans, there is an innate desire of us to exert our ideals and beliefs on others as well as an underlying ambition for power, hence these texts explore the way in which art can be used to shape and reshape historical perceptions as well as the universal relevance of power to human beings.…
In The Deposition of Richard II, it is obvious that the English king was disliked by all. A list of his grievances was drawn up, citing all of his poor choices as king and the reasons why he should be dethroned. The number one cause of the hatred of him was “his evil rule, that is, he has given the goods and possession…
Richard III, King of England, murdered his two nephews in order to maintain his power. This novel also…
The activities of the king and the duke show us as much about the victims of fraud as it does about the perpetrators. Discuss, making close reference to the text. Include a detailed discussion of one of these characters' scams.…
Mysteries and supernatural events have fascinated humanity for centuries. One of those mysteries was” Jack the Ripper” who terrorized London in 1888 and even the whole world.…
In these particular lines of act 3 scene 5 from Richard III by William Shakespeare, Richard orders Buckingham to spread rumours around Guildhall about the deceased King Edward. His intention is to convince the public that he is the rightful heir to the throne of England. There are four rumours that Richard tries to spread, including the illegitimacy of the princes, Edward’s wrongful murder of an innocent man, the unfaithfulness of the late king, and the incident that Edward himself is not of royal blood. In order to secure his position as next in line for the crown, Richard uses these lies to separate and hide the children of Edward and Clarence. Richard uses his deceiving public mask and clever manipulation, to acquire more power. By twisting around the actions of his brother’s corrupted ways, he exploits others, such as the general public and Buckingham. Appearances are not reality.…
One of the most famous Dickens's novels, The Mystery of Edwin Drood offers a lot of themes which could be discussed. One of them which is probably the most interesting is the doubleness of character John Jasper. It is probably the most interesting because John Jasper is one of the main characters. Although according to the title of the novel readers expect Edwin to be the main character, the story focuses on Jasper who is at the beginning presented as positive, Edwin's uncle who supports him and helps him. Towards the end of the novel readers have reasons to believe that Jasper himself is Edwin Drood's murderer. The novel has remained unfinished so no one will ever find out who was supposed to be a murderer. This fact makes the story more interesting and keeps readers' interest. John Jasper reveals himself as a very complex character who joins two different and in a way opposite characters. There is the impression that he embodies at least two completely different persons each of whom is complex enough to be discussed. There are also some suggestions by the critics that Jasper could be the description of the author's person – Charles Dickens himself. Different suggestions will be presented and discussed further in this work.…
His loss to France really put a big blemish on his record. He is also dismissed as an almost pathetically led king who lacked the nous in political judgment. Edward IV, on the other hand, is described as a decent enough ruler who grew prematurely aged by drink and debauch and opened the way for usurpation for the malevolent Richard III. On the controversial issue regarding Richard III’s wickedness, Norwich disagrees with those stating that he was a much-maligned emperor, stating that he was a ruler devoid of principle and conscience and would do anything to satisfy his political ambitions[CITATION Mic002 \p np \l 1033 ]. Norwich further alludes that there is little doubt in Richard III’s role in the murder of Edward V, his 12-year-old brother and the rightful heir to his…
John Dickson Carr lived a fortunate life, attending the distinguished Hill School, eventually studying abroad at Haverford College. His privileged approach to education led him down a successful career path within the literary world. Due to the prosperity of his works, John Dickson Carr was deemed the “master” of lock-room mysteries. From a young age, John Dickson Carr was a passionate writer. By fifteen, he has his own column in the local newspaper. His interests included clocks castles, armor, legends, and fortune, all elements that were worked into his compositions. Despite living in a quaint coal mining town, John Dickson Carr’s life was not a “rags-to-riches” Cinderella story.…
One of England 's greatest scandals was the disappearance and murder of two princes in 1483. The children of King Edward IV, Edward V and Richard, Duke of York were allegedly "imprisoned" shortly after his death. King Edward 's brother, Richard, Duke of Gloucester, secretly wanted the throne for himself. He would 've gone to extremes to make sure it happened. Yet, there is still great debate over him actually murdering his nephews. The Princes in the Tower focuses on the life of the two princes, how Richard III took over, and the death of the two boys.…
“Most of what you think you know about Camelot, Guinevere and Lancelot and the evil sorceress known as Morgan le Fay is nothing but lies.”1 For centuries, men and women across the globe have been enveloped in a tale, which, regrettably, is not true. King Arthur, or rather, Arthur Pendragon, was for many years accepted to be the mythical ruler of 5th and 6th century Britain. The tale of a boy who, at the young of age of fifteen, became the king of the Britons began in the 12th century and has since been altered to suit contemporary audiences’ expectations and desires. There have been occasions in history when the extent to which people have come…
He is driven only by his own will. This will is simply to have unlimited power – Richard wants to become king, and for this, he is able to do anything, even when it comes to killing. And he kills a lot: there is quite a high number of people before him who would become king if the current one dies, so he has to eliminate each and every of them to make sure that the crown finally lands on his head. And he does a great job: he is far the cleverest person in the play: he plans each and every step one by one, and successfully carries his plan out afterwards. He doesn’t realize, however, that he is just another card in the hands of history. At that time, England, and especially the ruling family of England was rotten. Deep down in corruption, hypocrisy, there is not a single character that we could feel sorry for – and Richard is the one who makes order, cleans the scum, before a new order can come. That’s why, when he finally becomes the King of England, he is lost. He has played so many roles, that he just can’t switch back to being himself. Actually there never has been a Richard himself as he always played roles, acted, and disguised everybody. He is the cleverest of all, but he has a lack of conscience. A king has to represent the whole country with his strong identity, and Richard does not have an identity at…
The famous legend of King Arthur and his knights of the Round Table is arguably one of the most highly acclaimed themes in British literature and history. Although the Arthurian legends, full of magic and heroism, seem to be far-fetched and a complete fantasy, evidence to prove the existence of the so-called “King Arthur” actually does exist, just not in great numbers. The historical foundation surrounding King Arthur is not enough to validate that he actually existed, yet it still leaves historians dubious that it is all a fantasy.…
I would worry not of it until after my walk. I returned to the stairwell and after lighting a candelabra I climbed the cold stone steps toward the abbey roof. Atop the stairwell I discovered that the doorway onto the roof had been jammed with small wood splints and the hinges pasted with glue. I had now begun to ponder the equivocal nature of both the staff and of Cousin Henry’s death. How could Henry have had stiffened the doorway when it was so obviously sealed from inside? With the base of the candelabra, I smashed against the hinges until eventually they broke away from the frame. The door crashed to the gravel and stone rooftop and I promptly stepped outside.…