Preview

David Hume Compare And Contrast

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1044 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
David Hume Compare And Contrast
Student Name
Professor Name
Course Name
Date
Contrast of Hume and Descartes Before any clarifications are made, differences between Descartes and Hume are made. Renee Descartes began his search for answers in solitude and presented his findings in a manner as if they were the fruits of his meditations. In his book, Meditation on First Philosophy, Descartes, in his path to absolute certainty, discarded all his pre-held notion that he had. In this endeavour to find ideas and truths that were beyond a shadow of doubt crystal clear he had to disregard all his pre-conceived ideas that were a result of his senses. The process is called methodological doubt, Descartes was a Rationalist. He stated that all sensory data could be unclear (misleading)
…show more content…
On the other hand, there is David Hume. In his book, An Enquiry concerning human understanding, David Hume speaks of how ideas are built up on the basis of impressions. By impression, Hume simply means those of sensory and emotive nature. In contrast, ideas are what we think and believe about these said impressions. These ideas are constructed on the basis of three stages (or laws of association), which are, resemblance, contiguity, and cause and effect. Hume justifies that matters of fact and ideas vary in importance and how they can be treated, meaning accepted. Matters of facts are simple truths which do not hold much importance and, therefore, be denied and contradicted. However, ideas hold a huge amount of significance and if they are not accepted then contradictions …show more content…
He rejects anything that comprises of doubts. He stops himself to fall into the trap of building on ideas that are doubtful in any magnitude. He states that senses provide information that helps us to move and work in the physical world, it does not provide truths. Another conclusion of the First meditation is that nothing should be accepted at face value, everything should pass the test of evidence- meaning do not accept anything as truth unless it has evidence. On the other side, David Hume falls from certainty to doubt because he starts of saying that all ideas are stemmed, and are copies, from impressions and that these impressions are a source of knowledge. Hume was more interested in the relations that ideas have with one another, not if they were true or not. In his opinion, the relation that should be given importance is of cause and effect but at the same time he says that causal relation is mostly influenced by habits (probability/connections). The madman views are, therefore, evident when Descartes states that nothing can be trusted if it has a shred of doubt, which he states is impossible. In case of Hume, when he says that matters of fact can be denied is wrong because they can also be proved through empiricism (Hume says we are not supposed to ascertain

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Chapters 6 And 7 Module 2

    • 1747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes's believed he could doubt everything that could be doubted, and the remainder was be the…

    • 1747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Hume's changed the idea of skepticism in a very different way. While Descartes used doubt and skepticism as a way to find out the foundations and roots of knowledge,Hume used sleo contrast with what we saw as the ordinary claims of knowledge. Hume explains two types of skepticism: antecedent and consequent. Both of these come in a very moderate and extreme form. He explains antecedent skepticism by using the Descartes theory of universal doubt. He explains that there is no principle that is more self evident than doubt and even if there was we would not be able to advance ahead of it because we our still able to doubt and reason deductively. This would mean Antecedent skepticism is incurable.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume’s version of empiricism begins with his distinction between analytic propositions “relationship of ideas,” which he considers to be a priori and true by definition, and synthetic propositions, which he considers to be a posteriori (“matters of fact”), and which are opposite of analytic propositions because they’re derived from our senses.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been a number of challenges questioning Hume’s sympathy. Some questioned the subjectivity of sympathy, since there should be an objective basis for moral evaluation, and sentiments, being the product of sympathy which is subjective to some extent, is not entirely an objective basis for moral evaluation. Some others challenged Hume with the “virtue in rags” argument, which suggests that sometimes good motives do not bring about pleasure in anyone, but we still approve of such motives, which is inexplicable by Hume’s sympathy. Another challenge is called the weak sympathy problem, which challenges Hume’s sympathy by pointing out that Hume only allows us to sympathize with others at a particular instant, and the object of sympathy is…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. exemplified the quality of courage in many ways. He never gave up, fought for equality, motivated people to never back down, and the list goes on. In having these qualities, MLK inspired and motivated many people all across the world. Martin Luther King Jr. showed moral courage in a huge way. He never gave up.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The view of interest here holds to the objection that personal identity is anything but ubiquitous, but rather the set of characteristics in question form a personality, which a person merely possesses as a holding, a constitutive of personal consciousness. On this view, a person can change their personality without having their identity annihilated in the strict sense implied by Hume, because one’s personality as well as the personality traits is constitutive of personal identity. Based on how this idea has been refined in recent paragraphs, I propose we rename it personality as a constitutive of personal identity or personality as a constitutive for short. The basis for personality as a constitutive has been that personal identity as a static…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most recognized critiques of Aquinas is David Hume, who addressed the argument from design in his work Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Hume began by summarizing Aquinas' logic, and the many alterations that followed. Essentially, Hume argued that attributing design in the natural universe to an intelligent creator is flawed in two ways. First, he uses to analogy of a house to discredit Aquinas' inferences.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hume is an Empiricist, this means that he believes that the source of a humans knowledge derives from or mostly from their sensory experiences. In short, people gain knowledge from their experiences. For example, children learn languages through constantly hearing someone (a parent or guardian) speaking to them in a certain language. Another example is that one can come to know what different colors are due to actually seeing the colors. Simply knowing the name of a color does not entail that someone knows what the color actually looks like. One can never fully come to know what a color is by simply being given the definition because in order to know what a color is, one must have a visual of the color to connect with the name. Thus according to Hume, a person learns and obtains knowledge through sensory…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes vs Locke

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates once said, “As for me, all I know is that I know nothing.” Several philosophers contradicted Socrates’ outlook and believed that true knowledge was in fact attainable. This epistemological view however had several stances to it, as philosophers held different beliefs in regards to the derivation of true knowledge. Rationalists believed that the mind was the source of true knowledge, while in Empiricism, true knowledge derived from the senses. Rene Descartes, a rationalist, and John Locke, an empiricist, were prime examples of epistemologists who were seen to differentiate greatly within each of their philosophies. However, although Descartes and Locke’s ideas did contrast in that sense, they both shared common concepts that helped mould the basis of their ideas.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sympathy, under Hume’s definition, clearly varies in terms of degree with the different connections the objects of sympathy have with us: we are more able to sympathize with a person close to us than with an indifferent stranger, and we sympathize more readily with our compatriot than with a person from another country with a different color of skin, as implied by the principle of association of ideas. Moral evaluations, on contrary, should not vary with the relationships the person, whose character trait is being evaluated, has with us. It is therefore counterintuitive for Hume to have his account of morality based on sympathy, which apparently possesses such a biased character. When two persons, with different relationships with us, share…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If death is the perpetual and permanent end of our existence, the question comes up, if suicide is morally right or wrong. Should death even be feared? Suicide rates are increasing, in fact, 2015; there was a suicide rate of 11.4 per 100,000 people, or in perspective, 800,000 in the world. My standpoint on suicide is that it is morally acceptable to do it under any circumstances.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes v Hume

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Meditation I, Descartes reflects on his past beliefs and realizes how so much that he once believed to be true was actually false. To separate what is truth from fiction; Descartes decided to completely reject anything which he can doubt at all. He wrote, “If I am able to find in each some reason to doubt, this will suffice to justify my rejecting the whole” (Descartes 4). The belief that inspired this method was that genuine truth was clear and distinct and that any doubt whatsoever could not provide absolute certainty. In essence, if any component of something was in the very least questionable, then any conclusion drawn from it would be at the most questionable. This method led Descartes to doubt practically everything he once believed, especially knowledge attained through the senses. He wrote, “All that up to the present time I have accepted as most true and…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Meditation one, Descartes initially writes about a blanket of ignorance that he feels he’s been trapped under for his entire life up until this point. He says “I had accepted, even from my youth, many false opinions for true.” With this statement, Descartes decides to do a spring cleaning of sorts of all his beliefs that he has reason to doubt. He makes a point to mention though, that not all of his beliefs are false or able to be refuted.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hume Philosophy Paper

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    David Hume was an early 18th century philosopher that is best known for covering a variety of theories. He covered that reason alone cannot be a motive to the will, moral distinctions are not derived from reason and moral distinctions are direct from the moral sentiments [Treatise of Human Nature, 11]. “Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them” [T 2.3.3 p. 414] in his work A Treatise of Human Nature.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes' Meditations

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Descartes’ method of doubt is a method of being skeptical about the truth of beliefs. It aims to find things that cannot be doubted…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics