Preview

David Hume's Ideas

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1146 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
David Hume's Ideas
Hume’s ideas may seem to be contradictory to people who try to understand, but they are not. He simply has similar ideals that just change when the circumstance change. When it comes to our natural world, Hume believes that induction is not based on reason, neither demonstrative or moral reasoning, but customs, the individual’s instincts or habits. However, when Hume demonstrates his beliefs that people should make an inference about a person’s future or private behaviors based off their past ones, he is speaking with regards to the fact that people are not predictable. Although Hume slightly defends people’s unpredictability by declaring every person acts the way they are suppose to (meaning if a person constantly changes their minds, they …show more content…
If a person were to see something happen, and then see something else happen after that, they may pay it no mind. The second time it happens, they think it is a coincidence. After the third time, they think it is strangely connected in some way. By the multiple time after that, that person expects the same thing to happen again, and every single time after that. That is what Hume describes as cause and effect. The example he uses is the game of billiards. When one ball moves and touches another, we expect that ball to move as well. That is a simple situation that people think of as a fact because they have seen it happen so many times. According to Hume, that is a form of moral reasoning, which is based off of matters of facts because it was our experience to watch the same chain of events happen multiple times. Hume also feels that it is experience that causes us to make inferences, just not reason. Customs, or our instincts or habits, force us to think right away what will happen when the ball hits the second ball because we have experienced it so many times. In other words, it becomes our instinct to know what will happen because of our experience seeing. Once the first ball moves, we do not sit there and reason what will happen next, we just …show more content…
People, unlike most things in our natural world, are not concrete. Each person has their own sets of beliefs, goals, morals, motives and other characteristics that are constantly changing due to the situation at hand. Since people have the free will to change their ideas at any given moment they are unpredictable. That is why they should be looked at with reason. While concepts in our world such as science and mathematics most of the time have concrete, right or wrong answers, there is nothing to reason because once we learn the answer, we remember the answer. Just as previously stated, when people have past experiences of the same thing over and over again, like five plus five equals ten, we eventually learn it as a fact. Though, people have no right or wrong answers, mainly because they can be both right and wrong at times. So even though Hume feels people always act the way they are suppose to, we still must take into consideration all the behaviors and actions that a person has exhibited in the past, so we can take all those observations and formulate them into a prediction of what that person might do next. For example, if a person has 6 interviews in one month, and he was ten minutes late to three, seven minutes early to one and one minute early to one, when would he arrive to his sixth

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In discussing the principles from which we determine moral good or evil, virtue or vice, Hume argues that because the number of situations we may encounter is 'infinite' it would be absurd to imagine an 'original instinct' or individual principle for each possibility. (T3.1.2.6)1 Instead he suggests that, following the usual maxim of nature producing diversity from limited principles, we should look for more general principles.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume Liberty and Necessity

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Section 8 of Hume’s Enquiry titled “Of Liberty and Necessity”, Hume wants to discuss what liberty and necessity mean and whether or not they can be compatible with each other. This is all really a discussion of Hume’s view of free will and determinism, and how they can be easily reconciled through compatibilism where for example both liberty and necessity are required for morality. He starts off by considering the idea of necessity and defines it as, “the constant conjunction of similar objects, and the consequent inference from one to another” (Hume 150). He wants to talk about its relation to what he calls liberty. He defines his hypothetical liberty as, “A power of acting or not acting, according to the determinations of the will” (Hume 159). This sounds like free will, meaning that people have the ability to act or not act in certain ways. He wants to deny any possibility of chance, because he’s an empiricist, and if you have the possibility of chance, what can you ever really know about the world. In every case, Hume is going to want to go out into the world and see where things come from even these ideas of liberty and necessity to see if there is a way to have both. To take it further, he goes on to claim that we’re all compatibilists without even realizing it. In order to explain his reasoning, he makes three arguments: the necessity argument, the spontaneity argument, and the anti-libertarianism argument.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the story this is water by David Foster Wallace, david discusses a supermarket scenario in which everyone around is in the way which shows the default of thinking a person is the center of the universe. After reading the story it is easy to see how when somebody would look at the generation today, the more they would start to notice that the people around them think they are the center of today's society. In today’s world there are billions of not just children but young adults and adults who think they are the center of attention. Going out in public anybody may see and realize how many people there are out there that think they are the only ones that matter. People like that are either selfish, confident, or rude towards others. When a…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hume is an Empiricist, this means that he believes that the source of a humans knowledge derives from or mostly from their sensory experiences. In short, people gain knowledge from their experiences. For example, children learn languages through constantly hearing someone (a parent or guardian) speaking to them in a certain language. Another example is that one can come to know what different colors are due to actually seeing the colors. Simply knowing the name of a color does not entail that someone knows what the color actually looks like. One can never fully come to know what a color is by simply being given the definition because in order to know what a color is, one must have a visual of the color to connect with the name. Thus according to Hume, a person learns and obtains knowledge through sensory…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume argued, that although sometimes a good motive does not bring about pleasurable outcomes, we are able to appreciate it . This is made possible by our imagination and our belief of cause and effect, with which we are able to visualize thus appreciate the supposed good outcomes of such a good motive under normal circumstances, and thereby approve of the motive, even if the imagined good outcomes are not realized in the reality . A good motive with good resulting effects realized certainly strikes us more strongly, but when the good effects are not resulted, we tend to correct our sentiment because luck carries no moral value .…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume believes the root of morality is emotion. He believes emotions, or passions, as he calls them, are the driving force behind our actions. Hume believes that how we feel about things determines what we determine is moral or immoral. There is no logical reason for keeping one’s promises if there is no benefit to you. However, we as a people have decided that keeping one’s word is moral because we would like someone to do that for us. We keep our promises because we want people to think kindly of us. There is no logic behind it, but there is emotion. Even when there is nothing to be gained for us by keeping our promises, we still maintain its moral to keep them because of how it makes us feel. This means, even when it is illogical to do something, if we feel it is moral, we should do it. Reason is not enough to change how we behave. It can give us some direction but it cannot compel us to do…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hume 's take on human morality is a very interesting one indeed to contemplate. His main argument on the topic is that the morality of humans is totally derived from sentiment, and in no way has anything to do with reason. He first defines sentiment and reason. He says that the former refers to passions such as emotions, feelings, appetites and desires. Then he also goes on to categorize the passions as being either calm or violent. And according to him, it is our passions that lead us to action. He also states that passions can neither be true nor false, they 're "original existences" (Hume 42 column 2 paragraph 3). Then he defines reason as, what we can say, are ruminations of the mind, which includes beliefs, thoughts, conclusions of arguments, etc, and declares that these can be true or false. It is with these definitions in mind that Hume goes on to make the statement that passion and reason cannot oppose each other. Because passions are original existences, they are neither reasonable nor unreasonable though they are the dominators of our actions. Reason, however, can be put to true/false evaluations and are actually derived from our passions. Reason cannot contradict passion because this would be an internal disagreement of ideas, which are considered as copies of the object which they represent, i.e. the particular passion. He states though that a…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature: in Two Volumes. London: Dent, 1934. Print.…

    • 2044 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Workgroups

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During trial there are ten basic roles associated with the courtroom. They are the judge, witness, prosecutor, the jury, clerk of court, court reporter, bailiff, defendant, defense counsel, and spectators or press. These roles make up the courtroom work group. All of these roles together help ensure the procedures of the criminal justice systems are being followed and carried out.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume and Matters of Fact

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hume denies reason any power because he is an empiricist. Instead three main principles exist that help humans form ideas; they are resemblance (when looking at a picture a person thinks of the object), contiguity (thinking of an object that is close spatially), and cause and effect (association). Hume claims that reason alone cannot establish matters of facts. There is no reason to believe that what happened one time will happen again. For example, there is no reason for Adam to believe that a rock will fall if he drops it unless he experiences it many times. Even with experience one cannot reason a matter of fact to be true, because the universe may not be uniform. There is a chance that because one thing happened many times, it makes it more possible that it will not happen again.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hume’s Argument for the claim that we’re not justified in our belief in the occurrence of miracles has five statements and it begins with the First Statement: We consider resurrection as a violation of the laws of nature as a dead person has come back to life. Secondly, it is a law of nature that dead people don’t come back to life(based on all prior experience), Statement three is that based on our past experience, every observed case, the probability of a dead person coming back to life is zero. We maintain that Hume’s Epistemological Principle is true. Therefore, we cannot justifiably believe that dead people come back to life. However strong the total argument each statement must hold up to the scrutiny that may be presented by those with opposing views and ideas.…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hume’s thesis for his ‘copy principle’ is the following: “all our ideas or more feeble perceptions are copies of our impressions or more lively ones” (EHU section 2 paragraph 5; pp. 77). In order to discuss what Hume means by this, I will first define the words used by Hume. By “impressions” Hume is referring to the perceptions…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hume Philosophy Paper

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    David Hume was an early 18th century philosopher that is best known for covering a variety of theories. He covered that reason alone cannot be a motive to the will, moral distinctions are not derived from reason and moral distinctions are direct from the moral sentiments [Treatise of Human Nature, 11]. “Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them” [T 2.3.3 p. 414] in his work A Treatise of Human Nature.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The second of Hume’s points is that the causal principle is doubtful. His evidence for this is that we can conceive of things without a cause therefore things without a cause are possible this is also backed up by Mackie who says that the causal principle has no evidence and only exists in a methodological sense. However this argument also has severe faults that discredit it. If the arguments from causality are questionable then that means that the arguments from conceivability are questionable as well. This could also mean that a logically necessary truth could be conceived as false if you don’t completely understand it. This opens the problem that just because something is logically possible then that doesn’t mean it could happen in the real world. This basically disables Hume’s ideas on non-causal…

    • 437 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Innovation Management

    • 3601 Words
    • 15 Pages

    As Human Resources Manager for The Networking Company 1 , who has recently acquired TTS Fire and Security Limited 2 , this report will present the Executives with proposals for high performance strategic planning during such organisational change and development. Moreover with a shift in the direction of the amalgamated organisation to include new environmentally friendly wireless products, this report will offer corporate programmes in order to support creativity, innovation and employee motivation through training, and tactical leadership. This assignment shall refer to several organisational behavioural theories and use critical thinking skills as it determines the best position for this learning organisation entering a relatively new, high risk and ambiguous market 3 . Notably there are significant studies that show that almost half of the mergers and acquisitions that occur fail to produce the desired outcome (i.e. shareholder equity), with an even greater number failing in the cutting edge technology sector 4 . However from the same research it is clear that there are also vast quantities of equity that could be gained should the acquisition become a…

    • 3601 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays