Preview

David Wilmot And The Free-Soil Party

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
116 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
David Wilmot And The Free-Soil Party
David Wilmot was democratic congressman from Pennsylvania. He introduced a measure in Congress called the “William Proviso”. He wanted to prohibit slavery in any lands acquired from Mexico. In addition, he did not want slavery or blacks to corrupt territory that was solely for whites. However, the William Proviso failed to become a law.

The Free-Soil Party was created in 1848. It was formed for whites that opposed slavery expansion. Additionally, the supporters believed the desecration that black men and women could bring to the new western land. Furthermore, Many Free-Soil party supporters were hostile towards blacks. Yet, a few black and white abolitionists supported their movement because they thought it was away to fight slavery.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many colonists needed free labor(Africans) for their farms but these people were not allowed any rights.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free blacks weren’t free because they couldn’t vote. Most states did not let blacks to vote which was unfair. Over half of the states did not allow voting for blacks (Doc A chart). Some states had black voting but it was restricted. “A $250 property requirement kept most black new Yorkers from voting. For example, of 11,000 blacks in New York City in 1855, 100 could vote” (Doc A chart).…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Free Soil Party Thesis

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Free Soil Party is an important but overlooked aspect of party history. It was created by "Conscience Whigs", who supported Whig ideology but felt that the lack of policy on slavery in the party was unacceptable. While no United States presidents have been a member of this party, which was formed in 1848 and disbanded in 1854, 1848 Free Soil candidate Martin Van Buren took enough votes away from the Democratic candidate at the time, leading to the election of Whig Party member Zachary Taylor. The Free Soil Party motto was "Free soil, free speech, free labor, and free men" . It is considered to be yet another predecessor to the Republican…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Know Nothing Party took a series of different positions to appeal to their voter base. A group of senators wanted to prohibit slavery in the western territories, freeing slaves held in Washington D.C., banning the purchase and sale of slaves, and repealing the Fugitive Slave Act which required people to return runaway slaves to their “owners.”…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moving on, another reason that their support grew would be due to the fact that they cloaked themselves in religion to hide their true intentions, by doing this they hid many of the violent solutions to their anti-black and anti-modern beliefs. Furthermore, they also supported ideas such as ‘the purity of white womanhood’ and ‘women voting’ which was a controversial topic at this time, therefore meaning that many people in the north who had campaigned for the 19th century to be passed then had further support for their cause.…

    • 552 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush Dbq Research Paper

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As Political parties became heated the idea of compromise was seen as even more improbable. The idea of Westward Expansion due to ‘Manifest Destiny’ led to more territorial expansion. The North wanted these future states to be slave states, but the south wished otherwise this led to more conflict in congress. After the United States Acquired land from Mexico after the Mexican-American war, things worsened. The Wilmont Proviso (which panned to ban slavery in any territory they received from Mexico) although was unsuccessful, it split political parties and led to the creation of the antislavery Republican Party in 1854.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First off, the free blacks were not treated as fairly as the whites politically. Citing from document A, not every state allowed blacks to vote. Out of 11,000 blacks, only 100 could vote in New York City. “ $250 property…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Economically farmers agitated for new land, and a rail route through a northern route was being promoted.(Martin 374) Politically there was a northern fury to the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The Kansas-Nebraska Act brought about a dramatic realignment of the two party system. Whigs abandoned their party and joined the Democrats, while northern Democrats repudiated their own elected reps. (Martin 374) The Republican Party benefited from those defections and was a new political organization. It contained antislavery radicals, moderate and conservative Free Soilers, old-line Whigs, former Jackson Democrats, nativists, and anti-slavery immigrants. With the Republican slogan “Free labor, free, soil, free men”, the rose as a consequence of the Kansas-Nebraska…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Wilberforce's greatest and most important political achievement was his long but successful fight to end Britain's involvement in the slave trade. He used his position as a spokesperson for the abolition movement and was the first member or parliament to raise the issue in the House of Commons. His abolition bill was finally passed by parliament in 1807, but his battle to change the law was not an easy one. Wilberforce tried and failed several times before the bill was finally passed.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because of it's prevalence in society both parties had strong opinions on it. While both parties favored the American Indian removal to free land for settlers, the Whigs were worried about the western expansion and what it meant for slavery. The Democrats liked the expansion because the southern states were beginning to get a little crowded, leaving not much room left for more farms and plantations. Where the southerners moved, came Democratic ideas, and with those ideas came slaves. This expansion of slavery worried the Whigs, especially in the senate, where if new states were to be added which had slaves, the perfect balance of free, and slave states would fall…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “William worked as a Philadelphia clerk who risked his life guiding runaway slaves to freedom in the years leading up to America’s Civil War” (Underground Railroad, web). In 1844, William migrated to Philadelphia, and three years later, he was selected to be the secretary of the Pennsylvania Abolition Society. “He was such an asset to the group, that he was elected chairman in 1851 (William Still, web.).” He became a significant part of the Underground Railroad, helping Blacks flee to Canada to escape slavery via the Underground Railroad. “Still began campaigning to end racial discrimination on Philadelphia streetcars (William Still, web.).” William wrote a description of his movement in, “Struggle of the civil Rights of Colored People of Philadelphia in…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 1860s election,the topic of slavery brought many political tensions to the Republicans and Democrats.The Republicans was an anti-slavery party.The Republicans disagree of the spreading of slavery and would take this issue to Congress,whenever they can,to stop its expansion.They viewed slavery as an a problem that would last forever,and thought the problem would soon lead to extinction (http://www.tulane.edu/~latner/Background/BackgroundElection.html). As for the Democrats,they were pro-slavery party.They viewed slavery was good not only for the slave holder,but also for the slave(John C. Calhoun).In the 1850s Abraham Lincoln said that slavery was “an unqualified evil to the negro, the white man, and the State,” but later on in his first Inaugural Address he said that he had “no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with slavery in the States where it exists.”Abraham Lincoln personally didn't like slavery but as a Republican he wished to abolish it.But as the President of America,he made a promise to the Constitution,which protected slavery (http://www.history.com/topics/emancipation-proclamation). Therefore the tension that rose from slavery resulted in constant fighting of the Republicans and Democrats.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In each movement, black members joined as a matter of life and death. For the Radical Abolitionist movement, black participants knew that immediate abolition was necessary to save their lives and the lives of their families and friends. Black citizens joined the Populist movement out of necessity as well. They believed it to be their best chance at racial uplift, education, legal justice, and voting rights.15As such, they were willing to support any movement that combated evils that they faced and promised political, economic, and social uplift, even when they understanding that they were being used for the influence of their vote.16 In each case the reason for black involvement is necessity, because these movements were the most promising courses of change for millions of de jure slaves of the antebellum South and de facto slaves of the Reconstruction and Post-Reconstruction South. However, a true interracial coalition cannot exist under these conditions, in which there is no accompanying unity of understanding, motive, and belief accompanying the supposed interracial unity, because neither group is aware of, nor consenting to the actual motives, means, and ends of their other group. Furthermore, under these conditions, the power dynamics render the black members of these radical movements susceptible to exploitation and false promises by the movements’ primarily white leaders, which is exactly the case in the Radical Abolitionist and Populist movements, and a true alliance cannot be founded upon exploitation and…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antebellum Period Essay

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The issue of slavery was always surfacing in older America; people finally began to do something about it in the slaves’ favor. People (including women) started to fight for slaves to have right and to be free because they were humans like everyone else, and they claimed it to be unconstitutional to refuse them freedom. The American Anti-Slavery Society was founded by William Lloyd Garrison and was an abolitionist society. This society normally sponsored meetings, signed anti-slavery petitions, and printed propaganda to promote anti-slavery. Many lectures and speeches were given by members of the society to help spread the word of anti-slavery across the land. As the issue on slavery grew, more and more people picked sides and got involved, which lead to heated arguments and eventually to physical debacles and riots. The government had to do something at that point to address the unconstitutionality of slavery.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    African American wanted to be free because they were USA citizen and they did not like someone call them nigger or free of slave. They wanted to have freedom of speech, vote,, human rights, self defense, they wanted to be free to go to school and be educated, and they did not like people look at them down because of their color.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Best Essays