Preview

Dbq4: Ratifying the Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
390 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dbq4: Ratifying the Constitution
DBQ4: Ratifying the Constitution

Pessoni2 The major arguments in the debate over the ratification over the U.S Constitution were the rights of individuals verses the rights of the states, the supporters and the opponents, were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Both sides the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists are debating to win the support of our nation. Farmers in 1787 were not happy under the Articles of Confederation. The government could do little about infiltration that was increasing at colossal rates. The ratification of the Constitution awaited. And everyone realized that the Articles of confederation were not working which increased the number of people that wanted a change (Document1). The Crisis period was too much to take in for the majority of people. The honor system was the state of mankind, this was under the Articles and it was failing terribly (Document3). Many Americans felt the need for the ratification of the Constitution to keep Americans and America together. There was a definite divide between supporters and opponents. The opponents did not reject the Articles. Many opponents feared that the Constitution is undemocratic and that it could be very oppressive overall. There were controversies about the Constitution and how it failed to address the need for an Army, Navy, or rotation of offices. Gaining federal offices was not democratic at all (Document2). State legislatures determined who could vote and where the Electoral College was and that was how the first presidents were elected. State legislatures also picked U.S Senators. In the Constitution there was no listing of rights, this concerned the Anti-Federalists (Document4). Some of the non-wealthy and less educated were afraid that the wealthier people would take charge. “And get all the money into their own hands, and then they will swallow all us little folk” (Document5). Farmers didn’t have any problem having a stronger state

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Revolution brought along much change in the now United States. Post war changes occurred in the republic, this included politics. One important event was that of the Constitutional Convention in which men formulated and revised state constitutions and also developed the method by which frames of government were written and approved. The status of women was being defined and the idea of abolition rose in the North. The central government’s power of the nation was too low. Unity and power lacked in the Confederation. National debt, trade, and protection against the Spanish and Brits were several of the problems facing the Confederation. Economic troubles also gloomed over the new developing country. A major issue dealt with paper currency and how quickly inflation had occurred. Shays Rebellion was an issues in which state governments would not come to the aid of debtors in New England, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, and South Carolina. During the reformation of the constitution, the question was whether to amend the Articles of Confederation or to write a completely new one. The Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan were two that were proposed. Conflict ensued between the states until the Great Compromise came to and established a bicameral congress which included the House of Representatives and the Senate. Men who fought against this new constitution were known as anti-federalists. But in the end the Federalists prevailed and the ratification of the Constitution…

    • 252 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, yet there was a struggle for its ratification that went on until 1790. Members of Congress believed that the Articles of Confederation, the first government of the United States, needed to be altered while others did not want change. After the Revolutionary War, the people did not want a strong central government, because it reminded them too much of what they were trying to escape. Under the Articles, each state had their own laws, and the need for a new Constitution was desired by many. This desired Constitution created a huge dispute and an argument between people who wanted things to stay the way they were and people who urged to change the Articles.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was the year of 1787 and the country was in conflict. The new constitution had just been written and states were deciding to ratify it (Davidson, 205). This constitution would hopefully protect better than the Articles of Confederation did. As with many other situations, there were two sides; the Federalists and the Antifederalists. Federalists agree with the Constitution while Antifederalists disagree (Davidson, 205). Each side had valid arguments, but the Federalists more so. Federalists argued to support the Constitution because it allots the federal government power over trade and tax, gives each branch checks and balances on one another, and can be changed.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    anti feds essay

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The constitutional convention is trying to decide on a plan to use, the Federalists or Anti Federalists. The Federalists wanted a strong central form of government. The Anti Federalists wanted less power to the national government and more power to the states. Even though the rights of the people may have been secured in the constitution, the Anti Federalists had the best plan because the Federalists gave the national government too much power and the constitution had no clearly stated bill of rights. The Anti Federalist plan included having a bill of rights that would clearly state and secure the rights of the people.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Constitution Dbq

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page

    After years of struggling to break away from Britain the United States was finally victorious.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 the Constitution was written and submitted to the states for ratification, this leading to months of fierce debate. Some states welcomed the new Constitution but others were fearful of it. They were afraid that this would be just like being under the control of Great Britain, which they just broke free from. But the rest of the states saw this as a good thing and very necessary for America to strive.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two major factions that almost disrupted the developing nation were formulated at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. At this convention, delegates representing all states expect Rhode Island formed a new type of government with the creation of the Constitution. In the ratification process America was divided in two, the federalists and anti-federalists. Federalists were in favor of a strong central government and hence supporting the new Constitution, while anti-federalists were in favor of giving the states a greater amount of power, thus opposing it. The opposition to the Constitution spreads from a mistrust of central government due to the grievances of English monarchy. The rights obtained by the central government took away states’ rights as seen in Sections VIII and X of the Constitution of the United States of American (Document 5). Most people who lived in cities, manufacturers, and northern merchants supported federalist views and most small farmers, southerners and frontiersmen sided with the anti-federalist views. Key federalists included Alexander Hamilton, John Adams, John Marshall, John Jay, and James Madison. In order to promote ratification Hamilton, Jay, and Madison published a series of Federalist Papers, (Document 8). On the anti-federalist…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not only was America suffering from the aforementioned problems, but to complicate matters further, it also had to deal with the aftermath of the failed Articles of Confederation. Furthermore, the 13 states were not cooperating together, which made the situation even more difficult. This goes to show the extent to which America was in crisis; even things like their core values, such as working together, were broken. Actions needed to be taken resolve the complications which the American people suffered at the hands of the failed Articles of Confederation, and to unify the states. This action was ratifying the constitution.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Argument Paragraph: The Constitutional Convention was divided into two groups, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The federalists were pushing for a more centralized power or government, and a new constitution. They believed that the Articles…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Constitutional Period, there were two groups of people; one group called the Federalists, wanted a stronger national government and one group called the Anti-Federalists, opposed the development of a national government. The Federalists ratified the Constitution to help properly manage the debt and tensions following the American Revolution. The Anti-Federalists opposed the development of a strong federal government and the ratification of the Constitution, preferring instead for power to remain in the hands of state and local governments. Although the Anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in the prevention of the adoption of the Constitution, their efforts were responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of Rights.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 when the U.S. government was frail under the Articles of Confederation there was a debate on whether to ratify the U.S. Constitution. Those who supported the ratification were the Federalists, and those who opposed were known as the Anti- Federalists. Federalists believed in the idea of a strong central government while on the other hand Anti- federalists wanted their own states to have the right to set their own laws.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In American society, there have always been groups that don’t share the same view as the other and are complete opposites. Besides the political parties of the Democrats and the Republicans that are dominant and seen today, another famous political feud that took place long ago was between the Federalists and the Antifederalists. Both groups wanted their political views to be recognized in a document that would lay out a new form of government for the newly independent America. Of course, this came with its own set of problems since each group had trouble cooperating with the other on a number of issues that concerned their new system of government. Since a previous document known as the Articles of Confederation proved to be a fragile system…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What were the major arguments used by each side (the supporters and the opponents) in the debates over the ratification of the U.S. Constitution?…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate of states’ rights versus federal supremacy is one that affects America today and has since the country was founded. It started with the writing of the Constitution in 1787 and the formation of Federalists and Anti-Federalists, who had opposing views on the document. The two major arguments were that a strong central government would eventually become tyrannical, and that a strong central government was needed for the nation to move forward. Years of conflict between the two sides occurred, over what form of government was best and what rights should be given to the states and government. continuing until the end of the Civil War when the power of the Federal government was finally cemented.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ratification Debate

    • 685 Words
    • 2 Pages

    People had many different opinions on the ratification of the Constitution. There were Federalists and Anti-Federalists that debated on many topics of the Constitution. The main reasons were: what type of government the United States of America should have, the people controlling our government, and some of the powers they should have. The Federalists were the ones who wanted change. They wanted to make changes to the government that was originally proposed. The Federalists wanted the government to protect the people, but not abuse their powers. They wanted to have the powers divided between the national and the state governments. The Constitution also stated that the government would be divided into three branches: legislative, judicial, and executive. In contrast, the Anti-Federalists wanted the original government that was placed under the Articles of Confederation. The people that debated over these different forms of government wrote about it in what is known as, “The Federalist Papers.” There were many authors that wrote about this debate, but the main ones were: James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton.…

    • 685 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays