Through impeccably examining the historical events that transpired through out the period of post-war global transformation amidst the backdrop of a looming Cold War that spanned the four corners and thus became localized in Guatemala with the culmination of the 1954 overthrow,…
Interspersed between the interview with Cucal is an outline of the 50’s and 60’s, which examines the Agrarian reforms and of the CIA orchestrated coup. Contrary to what many historians believe, the left wing reforms were not the reason for the CIA coup, but rather a growing and vocal Communist Party. This chapter also explores the unique role personal relationships play in Guatemalan politics and how people use the system personally, to express racism and settle old scores, an important factor in the 1978…
The tensions between the classes, the halves and the halve-nots are therefore represented by the two warring factions. The harrowing events in Mark Danner’s Massacre at El Mozote investigates and questions three central issues; the Massacre, the role of American Policies in the region during the Cold War and the executive cover-up of the events as Propaganda. One of the concerns is what responsibility (if any) did the U.S. government have for the massacre at El Mozote?El Mozote was “uniquely” different from most villages because it had resisted the Liberation Theology taught by left-leaning Catholic Priests and according to the author was “as as stronghold of the Protestant evangelical movement” (pg 19) . The villagers of El Mozote had their own chapel and referred themselves as born-again Christians and as Danner states were known for “their anti-communism” (pg 19). The villagers of El Mozote did not support the guerillas. According to Danner the Massacre at El Mozote takes place when American trained Salvadoran Armed forces called the Atlacatl Batallion arrived at the village and began systematically killing men, women and children by various means such as torturing, hangings, decapitation, and shooting. The U.S government was responsible for the massacre at El Mozote for a plethora of reasons. First, The Reagan…
Perez noted that the U.S. “assumed a position as protector of the interests of Cuba.” The U.S knew without Cuba under their influence would not be able to completely accomplish their interests which were central to its policy. These assumptions that the U.S. was a protector led many to fear the results of a potentially independent Cuba. Trumbull White depicted the Cuban Army as inept, “after three years of not being well armed and not having captured a city was due to their inferiority” (Pg 51). Perez concludes the chapter by saying how Cuban sources were neglected once…
was imperialistic “White Man’s Burden” How U.S. annexed Hawaii Sanford Dole Ch 18 Sec 2 Jose Marti U.S.S. Maine Yellow Journalism Rough Riders Treaty of Paris Ch 18 Sec 3 U.S. & Philippines after S-A War Emilio Aguinaldo Open Door Policy Boxer Rebellion Ch 18 Sec 4 The Platt Amendment Panama Canal Roosevelt Corollary “dollar diplomacy”…
In I, Rigoberta Menchú, Menchú, an Indian woman from Guatemala, explains the repression of Indians in Guatemala and the subsequent formation of a resistance movement. One of the most memorable parts of the book is her description of the Indian peasants’ 1980 occupation of the Spanish Embassy, in which at least 36 government officials and peasants, including her father, died. In her account, she helps the readers to understand the event through the perspective of the affected Guatemalan population. Though her depiction of this event is likely accurate, it is completely different than the portrayal of the event in The New York Times. Differences between the descriptions of the participants, purpose, and unfolding of events in these two accounts…
At the root of this system of institutionalized violence lay the fear of an indigenous uprising “coming down from the highlands”; the uprising of the early 1980s came closer than any other experience to realizing that great fear” (p.364). During this time, although the genocide had concluded…the ambition of ridding out the communist within the Mayan society was still continuing, especially from 1983-1990s. It was because of this that the Mayas were forced: to serve in the PACS (the self-defense patrol), to live in modern villages under military control, and to be overseen by the militarily administration in a constant effort to establish martial law which was all supervised by the General Victores. It was during this effort that the PACS were forced to kill villagers, the army used the essence of hunger to establish social control, and the ladino army felt it had the rights to control the Maya civilization of the highlands. Therefore… although the genocide itself was concluded…the efforts to control the Mayan society continued until 1990 when the war finally was concluded through the Guatemalan Peace…
The American intervention in the U.K. and Iranian affairs led to the downfall of one country and colonization by another. The same pattern of events happened in Guatemala when the U.S. bought land there and was going to lose that because Guatemala wanted to grow its economy. The CIA’s “covert ‘Operation PBSUCCESS,’ were among several hundred records released by the Agency on May 23, 1997 on its involvement in the infamous 1954 coup in Guatemala”. The coup in Guatemala was a war caused because the U.S. had to protect their interests, in this case money and land. Then again, the U.S. interfered in foreign affairs just a couple of years later.…
took towards undermining the Arbenz government was the cancellations of all American military supplies to Guatemala. However, the U.S. denied that it had anything to do with the United Fruit Company. They claimed communism to be the sole reason that they no longer wished to share military arms. The authors even state, “american officials replied each time that the disagreements between the U.S and Guatemala had nothing to do with the United Fruit Company, but rather concerned the failure of President Arbenz to oust Communists from his government” (pg 105). Communism would continue to be the scapegoat behind the U.S.’s motive as their plans…
General Beauregard was a great general for the Confederacy. He was called the hero of Fort Sumter because he protected the fort when the Union was attacking the fort. General Beauregard also had a satisfying life. He went to one of the best colleges ever. If I was General Beauregard's parents I would be very proud of him.…
Thesis: The duty to protect and intervene in other counties affairs, militarily if necessary, to protect freedom, liberty and to prevent genocide, ethnic cleansing, and other atrocities is a doctrine to which the United States of America should hold fast to under all circumstances. Throughout American history, the government has struggled to define the fundamental purpose of U.S foreign policy: whether or not the US should intervene internationally to promote freedom and preserve democracy or to maintain national sovereignty. The international community and the obligation that it holds to preserve peace is a responsibility not to be taken lightly. The commitment to uphold freedom and liberty as stated by our very own Pledge of Allegiance should…
In order to briefly talk about the American foreign policy, we must first understand the American outlook; what America thinks of itself. Americans have believed that the United states was different from nation states. Different in a sense that, they have always thought that they have (a) a special destiny and (b) A sense of mission. Now, since they have always thought of themselves as different from other nation states, that most important factors which influenced Americas self-image were: Isolationism, Moralism and Pragmatism. Isolationism: The causes of preference for isolation were geographical, emotional and mental in nature.…
Thesis: The Spanish American War represented a turning point after which the US was more aggressive and more internationally-minded than it had previously been.…
“Was the Mexican War a justified act of self defence or an unjustified act of imperialism, and are there comparisons to the recently ‘ended’ wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?”…
The Second World War forever changed how the United States viewed its role in foreign affairs. America understood it could no longer stand by and watch countries abroad occupy other nations without feeling any impact. In order to combat this threat, several presidents introduced ideologies to prevent the spread of communism and position America as a leader of the free world. America looked for ways to promote democracy around the world but it was met with opposition. The Soviet Union was not willing to conform to America’s way of life and this battle was the basis for…