Preview

Deductive Versus Inductive

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
741 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Deductive Versus Inductive
Deductive versus Inductive When presenting a logical argument the process of supporting the conclusion comes from the premises provided. Therefore, to stand up and present his or her beliefs, then will need a form of logical, deductive, and inductive reasoning to establish your argument. In the approach of a valid argument, there are seven rules of deductive inference and they are Modus Ponens, Modus Tollens, Hypothetical Syllogism, Disjunctive Syllogism, Conjunction, Simplification, and Addition. An example of a classic valid argument would have the components of a subject and a predicate. An example of it would be in the form of: My pet Scarlett fetches the stick (premise), Dog’s fetch sticks (premise), My pet is a dog who fetches a stick (conclusion). In the case of Modus Ponens, will affirming the antecedent where Modus Tollens denies the consequent in the argument. An example of Modus Ponens is; If Tiffany is pregnant, she must be a woman. Tiffany will become a mother, so than Tiffany is a woman. The example of Modus Tollens; If Harley is mother, she is woman, however if Harley is not a women but a man, than Harley cannot be a mother. When moving into the Disjunctive Syllogism the use of denying the disjunctive that is the statement of the argument. Mumie is neither a firefighter nor paramedic. One thing we know is Mumie is not a paramedic. Therefore, Mumie is a firefighter. In a Hypothetical Syllogism is the first premise of a major proposition which can shows uncertain condition such as ("if A, then B") or ("either A or B"; "S and T cannot both be true"). Therefore by doing this it can be properly resolved in a second premise so that a valid conclusion. Therefore, the resolution of the problem will always in the form of affirmation or denial argument. An example of it would be; Cindy went to the beach, she got sun- burned. However, she was not sunburned, so she must not have gone to the beach. Now moving


References: Pojman, L. P. (2006) Philosophy: The pursuit of wisdom, (5th ed.). Stamford, CT: Thomson-Wadsworth Retrieved on January 20, 2011

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1. Reaching a valid decision is based on the evaluation of arguments. If we know that a valid argument has true premises, then a decision based on the argument______________.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    5. Catherine goes to her local movie theater only to see romantic comedies. Since Catherine did not go to the movies yesterday, there is not a romantic comedy playing at her local theater. The reasoning above is flawed because the evidence…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law if Syllogism= if p->q is true, and q->r is true, then p->r is true. With this law, you are basically leaping over the “q” to reach a conclusion. Example: If you are a careful driver, then you do not text while driving. (p= you are a careful driver & q= you do not text while driving) If you do not text while driving, then you will have fewer accidents. (q= you do not text while driving & r= you will have fewer accidents)…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to our text, Deductive reasoning takes all of the given essentials and uses them and nothing else to structure a conclusion. Deduction is a form of argument that purports to be conclusive. The theory is what concludes to the…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An argument is a means to a solution. Thank You For Arguing by Jay Heinrichs shows readers how best to win an argument with 28 concepts. Three concepts that I believe are most important in the development of a successful argument are set your goals, speak your audience’s language, and finally give a persuasive talk.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. What is the term designating a valid argument with true premises? A strong argument with true premises?…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Logical argument is a form of reasoning that attempts to establish the truth of one claim based on the assumed truth of the evidence in other claims provided to support a conclusion. It is different from a claim or a statement because it is more then one statement or idea therefor calling for more claims, or statements.…

    • 591 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    PHL 111 Critical Task 3

    • 1105 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Reconstruct a full argument, showing how the premises/assumptions lead to the conclusion or goal that one is intending to prove.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This argument, in the transitivity of conditionals form, is valid. In order to defend the soundness of it, Armstrong breaks his essay into three main parts: arguing for P1, arguing for P2, and replying to a posed objection.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Quiz 1 Review

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages

    3. Know the three things that arguments do. 1. We develop arguments when we want to persuade. 2. We develop arguments to justify our positions on issues, learn new things. 3. We use arguments as a means of inquiry.* not just logic but our beliefs, values and commitments.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It consists of a group of statements with one or more statements (premises) supporting another statement (conclusion). In Critical Thinking, argument is an act of presenting reasons to support individual’s position or point of view. It is not quarrel or dispute. By "argument," we mean a demonstration or a proof of some statement, not emotional language. E.g., "That bird is a crow; therefore, it's black."…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the statement, "You didn't like that restaurant; so you probably don't like to eat out," "you probably don't like to out" is the…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    pose and evaluate arguments based on evidence and to apply conclusions from such arguments appropriately…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deductive Arguments: A deductive argument isn’t necessarily valid, it could be invalid. It also isn’t necessarily sound – it could be unsound. If the argument is valid and the premises are true then overall the argument is sound. You will always gain knowledge with a deductive argument. The first premise will link with the second premise in order to make a conclusion. Deductive arguments aren’t based on assumptions.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The four real distinct categories are deductive, inductive, abductive or inference, and analogical. Deductive Reasoning: Consist of Implication and Consequences, and Interpretation and Inference. Deductive reasoning is one of the two basic forms of valid reasoning. It starts with an assumed hypothesis or theory, which is why it has been called 'hypothetical-deduction; this assumption may be well-accepted or it may be rather precarious - nevertheless, for the argument it is not questioned.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics