Preview

Definition of Evidence

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
692 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Definition of Evidence
Nuts-and-Bolts of Evidence Week #2.
Jacob Atkinson
CJAD405

3. What is the role of the prosecutor in handling evidence at trial? The role of the judge? The role of the jury? What is meant by the statement, “the burden of proof of guilt in a criminal case is on the prosecution throughout the trial”?

Prosecutor- The prosecutor must determine what evidence needs to be introduced, but also how that evidence is produced and consider the appropriate time in which to display evidence throughout the trial.

Judge- A general rule states that trial judges have the inherent power to admit or exclude evidence at trial. A judge is there to oversee the entire case and ensure that nothing gets out of control. Judges have the responsibilities to make decisions concerning the constitutionality of law enforce activities, to protect witnesses from overzealous examination and cross examination by counsel, they are also to take judicial notice, ruling on issues of law, acting as a fact finder in some cases, and lastly to determine competency of the witness and evidence admitted being brought to testify.

Jury- Jury members have an obligation to resolve the conflicts that exist in the evidence and determine the truth based on the facts that both parties have presented in the courtroom. Juries are responsible for determining if the amount of evidence presented is sufficient to find someone guilty or not of the accused crime.

The statement the burden of proof of guilt is on the prosecution throughout the trial means simply this. The prosecution must prove that the accused is guilty. They must have sufficient evidence and witnesses in order to find the accused guilty. This is one of the best aspect of our countries legal system.

(Ingram, 83-90)

4. Define burden of proof, burden of going forward, and burden of persuasion.

Burden of Proof can be defined as the duty of proving facts disputed on the trial of a case by the proper weight of evidence. In other



Cited: Ingram, J. (2012). Criminal evidence. (11th ed., pp. 83-90). Boston: Anderson Publishing.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    R V Fraser Case Study

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Evidence must be gathered lawfully or else the prosecution is at risk of it not being able to rely upon in any consecutive hearing or trial as a judge could rule that the evidence is unreasonable.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chapters 5-9 Study guide

    • 2328 Words
    • 10 Pages

    4. Jurors are allowed to read peer-reviewed scholarly works (journal articles) to expand their knowledge on…

    • 2328 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch07

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages

    In a criminal case, the state must prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence.…

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Checkpoint #6 Cjs/200

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First I will start off with the one who has all the authority, the judge. The judge is the one who makes all the rules. Next is the prosecuting attorney. The prosecuting attorney may also be known as the district attorney, state’s attorney, county attorney, commonwealth attorney or solicitor. The prosecuting attorneys duty is to conduct criminal proceedings on the behalf of the state or the people against those accused. The three main roles of the prosecutor are investigating crimes, to decide whether or not to instigate legal proceedings and to appear in court. All of the duties of a prosecutor may become too much for one person to handle so they supervise a staff of assistant district attorneys who do most of the work in the courtroom. The prosecuting attorney determines which cases to pursue by the amount of evidence that they gather. If the attorney cannot find enough evidence to get a conviction then they may make the decision to drop the case. Next is the defense attorney. The defense attorney is the one who represents the one being accused of a crime. Public defenders also represents those accused of crimes, however they are state employed lawyers.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The prosecutor is accountable for exhibiting the state’s evidence as well as presenting and preparing the state’s case against the accused. It is also the prosecuting attorneys responsibility to decide which matters should be tried or not. It is the prosecutor who makes these determinations based on a several sets of criteria. Most prosecutors will study the evidence against the accused, study the crime, as well as many other factors.…

    • 279 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This process is where witnesses are called to give their statements. They are questioned and cross examined by all lawyers/attorneys. Cross examination is being questioned by each lawyer/attorney they may ask the same questions but in different words. The prosecutor is there to make the jury believe the criminal is guilty whereas the defense attorney is there to make the jury question if the criminal is really guilty. There are also three types of witnesses which are; ordinary witnesses, expert witnesses, and character witnesses. “Ordinary witnesses can testify only as to their personal observations. Expert witnesses, on the other hand, are allowed to offer their opinions in their area of expertise. Chartacter witnesses may testify only to the general good reputation of the defendant” (Zalman,…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The courtroom is where all the rulings take place and depending on the case, there can be…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The prosecutor is responsible for presenting the states evidence and preparing the states case against the accused. It is up to the prosecuting attorney to determine which cases should be pursued and which to let the charges drop. The prosecutor makes these decisions based on a variety of criteria. They will look at the evidence against the accused, the crime itself, the history of the accused as well as many other factors.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although Judges and jurors do not have many similarities there are a few. For example, both the judge and jury in any case have to be unbiased and have no prejudices. Moreover both parties are not allowed to discuss the case/trial with anyone (apart from the jurors talking among themselves in private).…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In criminal cases in the adversarial system of trial, justice is achieved through the use of evidence. In the adversarial system, the standard of evidence that can be used to support an argument is high. This is seen in the statement "… the rules of evidence are considerably more strict [than the inquisitorial system]."� This shows that the evidence that will be accepted is of reasonable quality and that it will less likely be made up. The burden of proof in criminal cases lies with the prosecution. The standard that guilt must be proven is beyond reasonable doubt. This is so that there is less chance of an innocent person being convicted. The statement, "No matter how strong the prosecution 's evidence may be, if the magistrate or the jury has any reasonable doubt that he or she is guilty, the accused is entitled to be acquitted"� proves that there should be no doubt when convicting a person. The standard of proof and evidence that the adversary system employs are among the…

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Matrix

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    | Ensure that innocent persons are not unfairly charged and that the evidence against a suspect is sufficient to support a specific charge. The finding of guilt or innocence either by trial or plea negotiation, as well as in the post-trial phase, which includes sentencing, appeals, and parole.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper

    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are three main roles that a prosecutor utilizes. These are as follows; investigating crimes, evaluating them to determine whether a legal proceeding should be initiation on the basis of the available evidence or not and then appearing in the courtroom. The prosecutor uses the prosecutorial discretion process. Through this process, the prosecutor evaluates filed charges and corresponding testimonies and evidence before…

    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antigone Mock Trial

    • 2403 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Prosecuting Attorneys (PA): Responsible for prosecuting Antigone by presenting & examining a witness and presenting evidence to the court; must come prepared with correct understanding of court procedures (objections), questions for direct examination/cross examination, and list of witnesses; must have opening and closing statements prepared.…

    • 2403 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The responsibilities of a judge in the criminal justice process consist of a variety of duties; no court judge have just one duty or job to complete on a daily bases. Some of these duties include determining probable cause, signing warrants, informing suspects of their rights, setting and revoking bail, arraigning defendants, and accepting guilty pleas. When a judge is not in court, most of the time, they are negotiating dispositions with prosecutors and defense attorneys. The most important responsibility is to ensure suspects and defendants are treated fairly in compliance with Due Process of Law. In a jury trial the judge is responsible for allowing the jury a fair chance to reach a verdict. Before releasing them to deliberate or discuss…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Americans, we are given the right to a jury trial, one of the most important freedoms that out judicial system has to offer us. A jury consists of anywhere between 6 and 12 registered voters who determine whether a person is guilty or innocent in the act of crime that they are being accused of. Not only do they possess this power in a trial, but they may also judge the laws themselves and whether or not is perhaps unconstitutional, unfair, or cumbersome, in which case they can declare the defendant, the person accused of the crime, not-guilty. Their responsibility is heavy and their power enormous in the outcome of a trial. It is a way of distributing the power so that not just one person has total power, and also allowing society to be involved with their government because the jury acts as the conscience of our society.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics