Preview

Delaware Death Sentencing Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
311 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Delaware Death Sentencing Case
“Delaware is one of the handful of states that gives judges the final decision-making authority in capital trials” (). “The shift to judge sentencing significantly increased the number of death sentences” (). A variety of things such as, gender increased the likelihood of receiving the death penalty. Countless people disagree with the decision of judges having rule over jury. During the 20th century many efforts were made to eradicate capital punishment. In 1958 they succeeded in abolishing the death penalty.
Delaware was the second state to rid of the death sentence after Missouri, however in 1961 the Delaware legislature reinstated the capital punishment. It was decided that the death penalty “violated the eighth amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment”. Capital cases that involve women are more likely to result in death sentences.
…show more content…
“Death sentencing is calculated by the number of death sentences by the number of homicides in a state, and Delaware has the third highest death-sentencing rate in the United states. Substantially more death sentences were issued during the judge era opposed to the jury era. It was also calculated that blacks were six times more likely to to receive the death penalty when they killed someone who was white apposed to killing a white person.
Does the death penalty violate the sixth and eighth amendment was a question that was asked, “Although there is substantial research about the nationwide operation of capital punishment, empirical research on Delaware’s death penalty is modest in amount”. The Delaware supreme court concluded that because the mercy statute” delegates to jury and judge uncontrolled discretion the imposition of the death penalty there is room for that caprice, whim, and discrimination in the imposition of the death penalty that now stands condemned by the United

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Ring Vs Arizona Case Study

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "It is insisted that the channeling and limiting of the sentencer's discretion in imposing the death penalty is a fundamental constitutional requirement for sufficiently minimizing the risk of wholly arbitrary and capricious action." (408 S Ct. 238 (1972).…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Problems began arising with the death penalty on February 18, 1972 with the People v. Anderson case. This is a case in which the California Supreme Court declared the death penalty cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the state constitution. This case caused all capital punishment sentences to be changed to life in prison without parole. “As a result, 107 inmates were taken off death row and resentenced.” (Propositions). This would be the start of an ongoing battle with the California Supreme Court. In November, 1972 California electorate overruled the State Supreme Court's decision by a state constitutional amendment known as Proposition 17. Due to the passing of Prop 17 legislation was enacted making the death penalty mandatory in…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A third disputation of those who advocate capital punishment is that “it does not violate the US constitution.” One of these is Antonin Gregory Scalia, who was an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1986 to 2016. In the article, “The Death Penalty Does Not Violate the US Constitution”, Scalia mentioned the Fifth and Eight Amendment to reject viewpoints of opponents who boycott capital punishment. The Fifth Amendment declares that “[n]o person shall be held to answer for a capital … crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury … nor be deprived of life … without due process of law.” The Eight Amendment also bans the federal government from using cruel and unusual punishment. Scalia firmly proclaimed…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maryland has reinstated the death penalty in 1978 as an option for people convicted of felony homicide. Since that time, only five convicts have been put to death and five are currently awaiting their execution. There is so much publicity available debating whether or not a death penalty is effective as it used to be in older days. (www.urbanin.org). There are other important issues that are discussed in this paper as well: cost of death penalty versus cost of a life without parole, victims’…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Furman V. Georgia

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Georgia. Was capital punishment a violation of the 8th Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment? The majority of the Court deemed it was not since “Capital punishment accords with contemporary standards of decency, capital punishment may serve some deterrent or retributive purpose that is not degrading to human dignity, and in the case of the Georgia law under review, capital punishment is no longer arbitrarily applied” (Gregg v. Georgia, 1976, p. 1). The difference between this case and Furman v. Georgia is that previously the Court had ruled that the death penalty methods as administered back then were unconstitutional, not the actual idea of the death penalty…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Opponents of the practice most often utilize moral or legal grounds as the basis for their arguments or in some cases a combination of the two. Most often cited in the arguments against the use of the death penalty are the contentions that the use of the death penalty constitutes cruel and unusual punishment as prohibited by the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. This argument is the one which was used in the 1972 case of Furman v. Georgia which alleged that Georgia’s death penalty statutes constituted cruel and unusual punishment and led to a temporary moratorium on the use of the death penalty until state legislatures came up with concise procedures, in the words of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Warren Burger, “legislative bodies may seek to bring their laws into compliance with the Court’s ruling by providing standards for juries and judges to follow in determining the sentence in capital cases or by more narrowly defining the crimes for which the penalty is to be imposed” (Banner…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty violates the eight Amendment of the United States Constitution that forbids cruel and unusual punishment. John M. Sheb and John M. Sheb II wrote in their book Criminal Law and Procedure that the eight amendment of the United States Constitution has been employed to limit the definition of crime. The authors mentioned the case of Robinson v. California where the Supreme Court, relying on the cruel and unusual punishment clause, found it unacceptable the state law that made crime the use of narcotics. The law was struck down because the Court determined that one couldn’t be punished merely for status without committing a criminal act (Sheb, 70-71). The Death penalty practices serve to be inconsistent with the fundamental laws and values in America’s democratic system.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “The Federal Government Plans To Seize Nebraska’s Illegal Execution Drug Shipment When It Arrives In The U.S.”, author Chris McDaniel writes about a letter from the FDA explaining that Nebraska next shipment of execution drugs would be illegal. As well, the repeal of the death penalty that happened in the Nebraska legislature. The death penalty is a dividing issue in the United States because the ongoing debate over its constitutionality. In this debate over its constitutionality, I side against the death penalty. I am against the death penalty because if exonerating evidence surfaces after a prisoner is executed there is no way to fix it. Also, I question the appropriate method for execution with the issue of cruel and unusual…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On a 7-2 vote, the supreme court decided that the death penalty for the crime of murder did not violet the eight and fourteen amendment. Justice Stewart, Justice Powell, and Justice Stevens concluded that “The existence of capital punishment was accepted by the Framers of the Constitution, and for nearly two centuries this Court has recognized that capital punishment for the crime of murder is not invalid per se” (Gregg v. Georgia), our framers validated the use of capital…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    8th Amendment Essay

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution has generated a considerable amount of debate and controversy surrounding the question: what is considered “cruel and unusual punishment.” The important issue that develops from this amendment is whether or not the death penalty is constitutional. Over the decades, the Supreme Court fails to completely confront the issue by refusing to address any issue that falls outside of the case in question. As a result, today’s court is left with many specific instances where the death penalty is acceptable or unconstitutional, but not an overall principle that the death penalty is consistent or inconsistent with the Constitution. In Roper v. Simmons, seventeen year-old Christopher Simmons is tried as an adult…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States Constitution allows for some form of capital Punishment. Under the eighth Amendment no person shall and ever will be deprived of life without due process of the law. Over the past few centuries the words cruel and unusual punishment have changed. When legislators created the Eighth Amendment, they did this for no criminal to be treated as wrong as they treated their victim. The United States Constitution allows us to interpret that a man can be executed, but in the most humane possible. According to the article “ The Death Penalty Does Not Violate The U.S Constitution.” It says “The US Constitution specifically allows for the death penalty to be imposed as a criminal sanction, and democratically elected legislatures—not court…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In a monumental 1972 decision by the US Supreme Court, all but a few death penalty statutes in the United States were declared unconstitutional” (Radelet & Borg, 2000, page 1). Four years later the Supreme Court reversed its course toward abolition by approving several newly enacted capital statutes. By 1999, there were “some 3500 men and 50 women on death rows in 38 states and two federal jurisdictions” (Radelet & Borg, 2000, page 1). The author describes how there has been fluctuations in the general population opinion regarding the death penalty since its reintroduction in 1976. While the majority of the American public supports the death penalty, recent studies have shown that this support has diminished a little.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Eighth Amendment

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The government in the United States has done everything they can to uphold the eighth amendment. They have gone as far as overturning a previous decision because it was not in agreement with the amendment. In 1989 Penry v. Lynaugh ruled that it was acceptable to execute mentally retarded individuals. The big issue was whether or not a mentally retarded individual possessed the mental and moral capability to be subjected to the death penalty. “A separate five-to-four majority struck down the Texas capital punishment statute under which Mr. Penry was sentenced. The Court held that the three-part test provided by the statute did not allow the sentencing jury to give full consideration to the mitigating evidence of Mr. Penry's mental retardation.” (Berg) Researchers found that if the jury had been able to review mitigating evidence, Penry would not have received the death penalty but rather life in prison. Therefore his sentence was considered cruel and unusual. Years later the Supreme Court reviewed this case in Atkins v. Virginia and declared it unconstitutional.…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all 18 ,states have already blocked using the 8th amendment and New Hampshire and Delaware are so to follow. The death penalty is only used in a small amount of states and is given to the worst of the worst . Only 33 states have the death penalty. The Supreme Court might find the 8th amendment punishment unusual.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital Punishment Thesis

    • 3040 Words
    • 13 Pages

    On July 4, 1776, a group of fifty-five gentlemen drafted a set of rules called the Constitution. It was then, as is now, the law of the land that Americans live under. However, through the years it has been amended to allow for changes in society, and the way the American people evolve in thought and virtue. It is the job of the Supreme Court of the United States to interpret the Constitution and determine what exactly these amendments state.…

    • 3040 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays