Preview

Summary Of The Death Penalty Does Not Violate The Constitution By Anthony Scalia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
285 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of The Death Penalty Does Not Violate The Constitution By Anthony Scalia
A third disputation of those who advocate capital punishment is that “it does not violate the US constitution.” One of these is Antonin Gregory Scalia, who was an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1986 to 2016. In the article, “The Death Penalty Does Not Violate the US Constitution”, Scalia mentioned the Fifth and Eight Amendment to reject viewpoints of opponents who boycott capital punishment. The Fifth Amendment declares that “[n]o person shall be held to answer for a capital … crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury … nor be deprived of life … without due process of law.” The Eight Amendment also bans the federal government from using cruel and unusual punishment. Scalia firmly proclaimed
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Atkins Vs. Virgini Case Study
    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Atkins Vs. Virgini Case Study

    The court previously establish that the death penalty was inappropriate for the crime of rape in Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977), or for those convicted of felony murder who neither themselves killed, attempted to kill, or intended to kill in Enmund v. Florida, 458 U.S. 782 (1982). The Court found that the Eighth Amendment forbids the imposition of the death penalty in these cases because legislatures had recently addressed the matter have rejected the death penalty for these offenders. Moreover, the Court defer the judgments of those bodies. The court ruled 6-3 that executing mentally retarded individuals violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments, but states can define who is mentally…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Antonin Scalia Summary
    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Antonin Scalia Summary

    Throughout Antonin Scalia’s dissent opinion, he states that the way the court interprets the Affordable Care Act, is different to the way he interprets it. For instance, the interpretation of “exchange established by the state,” and the tax credits under code §36B differs between the court and Scalia.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gregg Vs Georgia Case Study
    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gregg Vs Georgia Case Study

    Facts: Gregg argues that capital punishment is cruel and unusual, so it violates his constitutional rights protected under the Eighth Amendment. In 1972 the U.S, Supreme Court ruled in Furman v. Georgia, that the death penalty couldn’t be used in an arbitrary manner, in any state.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Liberties: Govt 2305 United States Government
    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Civil Liberties: Govt 2305 United States Government

    17. What amendment is usually used to argue against the constitutionality of capital punishment? Violates the 8th amendment prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment. Is the death penalty constitutional, according to the Supreme Court? Courts have not agreed with this argument but have many rulings regarding Capital punishment. Why was there previously a mortetorium on the imposition of the death penalty? How has capital punishment been restricted since 2000?…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Professor Johnson's Death Penalty E0: The Fourteenth Amendment To The United States
    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Professor Johnson's Death Penalty E0: The Fourteenth Amendment To The United States

    E3- The founders believed that capital punishment, and the death penalty specifically, is constitutional and should be allowed, so long as the due process…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Roper V. Simmons Case Study
    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Roper V. Simmons Case Study

    The main focus point and argument regarding both the Stanford v. Kentucky and Roper v. Simmons case rely mainly on the eight amendment. Throughout both cases, the eighth amendment played a key factor in determining the court’s decision, regarding whether or not Simmons or Stanford would be facing the death penalty. Both “The Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments forbid imposition of the death penalty on offenders who were under the age of 18 when their crimes were committed.” The eighth amendment states “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” While both the eighth and fourteenth played a key factor in determining the court’s decision, the decision was more so based on the eight amendment. Both cases predominately focused on the phrase, “nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Warren Mccleskey: Supreme Court Guilty Of The Death Penalty
    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Warren Mccleskey: Supreme Court Guilty Of The Death Penalty

    When a person is found guilty of murder and they are given the death penalty, and later it is found that the person is innocent, you cannot correct it and bring them back to life. Is that justice? Every day in school we recite the pledge of allegiance and it states that we have justice for all but did Warren McCleskey receive the right justice? In the Preamble of the Constitution, the first thing it states is to establish justice. The Declaration of Independence states that all men are created equal and they have the rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. Warren McCleskey received the death penalty after he was convicted of murder and the Supreme Court reviewed the case to figure out the proper sentence for Mr. McCleskey.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Delaware Death Sentencing Case
    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Delaware Death Sentencing Case

    Does the death penalty violate the sixth and eighth amendment was a question that was asked, “Although there is substantial research about the nationwide operation of capital punishment, empirical research on Delaware’s death penalty is modest in amount”. The Delaware supreme court concluded that because the mercy statute” delegates to jury and judge uncontrolled discretion the imposition of the death penalty there is room for that caprice, whim, and discrimination in the imposition of the death penalty that now stands condemned by the United…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Antonin Scalia Research Paper
    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Antonin Scalia Research Paper

    Antonin Scalia is an American Associate Justice in the United States Supreme Court. He was appointed by President Ronald Regan in September 26, 1986 and preceded by William Rehnquist. He also sits as the longest serving justice on the court. Justice Scalia is well known for his dissents, where he uses a colorful style of writing when opposing his colleagues.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Timothy Mcveeigh The Death Penalty Essay
    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Timothy Mcveeigh The Death Penalty Essay

    The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Oklahoma State Prison Case Analysis
    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Oklahoma State Prison Case Analysis

    In Alito’s opinion he says that there is two reasons why they affirm and accept the midazolam efficacy. The first reason is the inmates “failed to identify a known and available alternative method of execution that entails a lesser risk of pain, a requirement of all Eighth Amendment method-of execution claims” (Glossip v. Gross 576 US __ (2015)). The second reason mentioned by Alito was “the District Court did not commit clear error when it found that the prisoners failed to establish that Oklahoma’s use of a massive dose of midazolam in its execution protocol entails a substantial risk of severe pain” (Glossip v. Gross 576 US __ (2015)). In this Glossip v. Gross, a dissent written by Justice Breyer and later joined by Justice Ginsburg, made this case more notable. Elizabeth Franklin-Best, a journalist, stated that “the dissent calls for nothing less than full reconsideration of the constitutionality of the death penalty as a punishment, and it offers a veritable road map for challenges going forward” (Franklin-Best). Justice Breyer concluded in his dissent that the death penalty violates the Constitution considering the “given changes in the United States over the last 40 years and drawing on his own 20 years’ experience on the bench.” (Franklin-Best). Because the death penalty can be looked at as “unreliable”, Justice Breyer drew the conclusion that this qualifies it as a “cruel” punishment. Justice Breyer believes that…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Edward Koch And David Bruck's The Death Penalty
    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Edward Koch And David Bruck's The Death Penalty

    Is death the justification of a murder or are we merely subduing ourselves by performing the same heinous act? This argument had been debated for many decades and although some feel that death is the answer to a murder, there are others that find it completely barbaric. Through a careful analysis between Edward Koch's "Death and Justice" and David Bruck's "The Death Penalty", I believe Koch had the better argument in claiming that death is the justification of a murder. I feel that if someone were to kill another person, we have all rights to sentence them to a death penalty to guarantee such a horrific crime would not happen again.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    8th Amendment Research Paper
    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    8th Amendment Research Paper

    In the constitution of the United States, the very documents that our nation is built upon, it is said that, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1791, has three provisions” (Madison, 1778). Dzhokhar Tsarnaev would in turn later be sentenced to the death penalty for his crimes. However the questions still stand, is this the appropriate ruling? Or is capital punishment in violation of The Eighth Amendment? After all the killing and pain that he caused, the death penalty is nothing but the right punishment for a man so tarnished by evil. Tsarnaev does not stand alone in his crimes. Around the world and around our country people perform acts that should not be taken lightly, and should be punished heavily. Acts of terror, gruesome murders, rape, and a long list of other atrocious crimes should all be punishable by murder. While the system is not perfect, it is fixable and it is just. Justice is blind, but punishment…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mark George The Significance Of The Eight Amendment
    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mark George The Significance Of The Eight Amendment

    The death penalty violates the eight Amendment of the United States Constitution that forbids cruel and unusual punishment. John M. Sheb and John M. Sheb II wrote in their book Criminal Law and Procedure that the eight amendment of the United States Constitution has been employed to limit the definition of crime. The authors mentioned the case of Robinson v. California where the Supreme Court, relying on the cruel and unusual punishment clause, found it unacceptable the state law that made crime the use of narcotics. The law was struck down because the Court determined that one couldn’t be punished merely for status without committing a criminal act (Sheb, 70-71). The Death penalty practices serve to be inconsistent with the fundamental laws and values in America’s democratic system.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Justice Antonin Scalia Summary
    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Justice Antonin Scalia Summary

    Justice Antonin Scalia has said in the past regarding abortion that there is nothing in the Constitution that mentions anything about a right to abortion. The Constitution simply states nothing about this issue. One possible way to fix whether there is a female right for women or not is to look at how most rights are created in a democratic society and then either amend the Constitution, or create a law. The Constitution cannot compromise, but a law can because the Constitution as Justice Scalia believed is a document that is meant to hinder and restrain from change. The Constitution is our supreme law of the land, and it is not and should not be meant to encourage or make change happen.…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics