If someone had the courage to take the life of another then he/she should have the courage to face the consequences.
If someone had the courage to take the life of another then he/she should have the courage to face the consequences.
The death penalty is one of the controversial topics being widely discussed today. Anna Quindlen is one of many people who opposes the death penalty. She is a crime buff who has worked as a reporter for decades in some of the worst areas of New York. In her article, "Death Penalty's False Promise: An Eye for an Eye," she states how the death penalty and her have nothing in common. She claims that the killing of one human being as punishment for the killing of another makes no sense and is inherently immoral. She tries to relate to her readers by using imagery, stating her opinions, and by appealing to the emotions of her readers. Throughout her argument, she also uses many examples to back up her opinions. She gives examples of situations that appeal to her readers sentiments and makes them feel connected to the…
Edward I. Koch, long active in Democratic politics, was mayor of New York from 1978 to 1989. “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life” first appeared in the New Republic in 1985, while he was still mayor. The audience of the essay is the people of New York, readers of the New Republic, and anyone who is interested in learning more about capital punishment. In his essay, Koch explains the reasons why he supports capital punishment by examining seven arguments most often heard in opposition. Koch’s third of the seven arguments he made was toward the statement, “An innocent person might be executed by mistake” (485). He argues that without the death penalty, a murderer could be freed from prison and will continue to kill after they…
In “Six Reasons the Death Penalty is Becoming More Expensive,” Maurice Chammah addresses the growth in the cost of capital punishment within the United States of America and the main factors that contribute to this growth. Chammah predominantly traces the growth to the unpredictability regarding the length and verdict of a trial. Many death penalty cases remain intact for a long time before a decision is finally reached, and sometimes, even once a guilty verdict is reached, a verdict of capital punishment can be reversed. When an appeals court reverses a death sentence the county faces the cost of an entire additional trial and another round of appeals. In a murder and robbery trial in Randall County, San Francisco, it’s estimated that the…
The death penalty is a very controversial topic that some may oppose while others assent. I have read two interesting essays about the death penalty. One is entitled “The Penalty of Death” by H.L Mencken and the other “Execution” by Anna Quindlen. Both authors presented their arguments and used great points to support their opinions. H.L Mencken is for the death penalty while Anna Quindlen is against it. After reading these two authors work I was able to form my own opinion on this punishment. I condone the death penalty despite how cruel it may be.…
Arguments on capital punishment have been around for centuries, and will continue to be so. Providing adequate punishment to those that take a human life must be approached very carefully. David Bruck wrote a response to Mayor Edward Koch's essay entitled, "Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life," in which he goes on to explain through examples why the death penalty should be forgotten. In Bruck's response, "No Death Penalty," he provides many examples, but few arguments to support why the death penalty should be abolished.…
The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…
The death penalty has been a continuous argument that has been debated throughout history. This topic can be seen and heard in novels, articles, journals, essays, and speeches. There seem to be two primary sides on the death penalty. One side argues the idea that the death penalty should be practiced, which can be seen in Edward I. Koch in his essay, Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life. The opposing side believes that people should not permit killing other people as a form of punishment; this is illustrated in The Death Penalty by David Bruck. After analyzing the two essays, I came to the conclusion that David Bruck's essay proves his claim in a more effective and efficient manner than Edward I. Koch.…
The argument that it is only acceptable to kill someone if they truly deserve death for their actions is prominent in the television series Dexter, however this does not hold true in our country today in regards to the death penalty due to lack of evidence, lack of fair trial, and unjust reasons for killing.…
Bernie Sanders argues that the death penalty is not necessary. Bernie states ¨ The state itself, in a democratic, civilized society, should itself not be involved in the murder of other Americans.¨ Bernie is insisting that if someone has murdered multiple people then they should not be killed. I think Bernie is mistaken because he overlooks the people that only want to cause harm to others. While it is true that not everyone deserves to die, it does not necessarily follow that some people have a sole purpose of killing others. Ultimately, what is at stake here is killing one person to save others…
In his essay Death and Justice, Edward Koch argues in support of capital punishment, he believes it is just and it saves lives. He successfully delivers an argument laced with true and vivid examples of unforgettable murderous events. His intended audience consists of the opposing voters and readers of the New Republic, the political magazine that published his essay. Prior to reading Edward Koch’s essay I was sure that I would disagree but it became clear to me that he is right. There are seven commonly held views against the death penalty that Koch argues against in his essay. In what follows I discuss a few of his arguments and show that the death penalty is the most viable approach to deal with convicted murderers.…
In his essay, the author includes seven main arguments opposing capital punishment and refutes them. People may find that the death penalty is a barbaric act and Koch argues this point by suggesting that the method of lethal injection is actually quite humane and literally painless. He also argues that although no other democratic country imposes the death penalty as a form of punishment, no other country boasts a murder rate as high as the United States. The author contends with those who believe capital punishment diminishes life’s value by suggesting the contrary. He has found those who are sentenced to death have been judged fairly and with a great deal of examination. Koch then refutes the argument of capital punishment as a state-sanctioned murder by acknowledging that the state holds much different rights and responsibilities than the individual.…
The argument for the death penalty is that many accept as true that if you kill then you deserve to die. When an individual takes another individual’s life they forgo or surrender their own right to their life. Committing a homicide is one of the vilest felonies anyone can do and therefore it should get the nastiest penalty they can receive.…
The purpose of the death penalty is to allow states the right to punish criminals with the highest possible punishment, death. People argue that it is morally wrong for the death penalty to exist, because it allows people to “play God.” Others believe that it helps protect our country from criminals and save lives. Due to this controversy, the death penalty has became a major source of debate in the United States.…
The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…
The death penalty in the U.S. has been and continues to be a controversial debate between citizens. Debate regarding the policies, laws and if the death penalty is the best way to punish offenders who commit violent crimes. The history of the death penalty in the United States dates back to the late 1970s. Between 1968 and 1977 there were no executions in the United States. In the Supreme Court case of Furman v. Georgia, the court ruled that capital punishment, as it currently employed on the state and federal level is unconstitutional (Jones, 2006). The Eighth Amendment states that any form of capital punishment qualifies as “cruel and unusual punishment.” The use of executions during this time was primarily based on race and was considered by the Supreme Court as “arbitrary and capricious.”…