Democratic government guarantees freedom of thought, action and speech. Hence it allows the individual to grow freely. The citizens has interests in country affairs, and what their representatives are doing. The voters’ misjudgement in casting votes may not elect the best men. The illiterate people especially fails to understand that elections are usually a matter of propaganda. "Nine people out of every ten", says Carlyle, "are fools", and citizens who are not sufficiently intelligent or educated are likely to misjudge while voting. But in democracy unity of action is essential. In a multitude of minds, much unprofitable discussion may takes place.
On the other hand, in dictatorship the government is ruled by an individual or a small group of people. "One bad general", said Napoleon "is better than two good ones". It helps in coping with emergencies for prompt and effective action. The dictatorship certainly has its merits. The power resides with dictator. It is safer only if dictator has an exceptional ability to organize, direct and administer. Parliamentary rule is usually a government by a group of politicians. The politicians may have their private interests. The dictatorship has an advantage here if a dictator can concentrate all its energies on the uplift and improvement of the country. The phenomenal success of Hitler and Mussolini in their respective countries is explained in world history. "My programme", said Mussolini "is action, not talk."
Unfortunately, the dictatorship methods are ruthless. Dictatorship employs force and violence to maintain itself. It resorts to physical compulsion, prisons, intimidation etc. The history of Russia and Germany witnesses countless executions for the stability of dictatorship. Its demerit is that there can be no freedom of thought or speech. The support of people is retained by an Intensive propaganda, as was done in Hitler's Germany. It doesn’t allow any political opinion.
Dictatorship hinders the free development of the human personality. The greatest danger arises when the dictatorship is biased to use war as an instrument of national glorification/expansion. Practically every dictator preaches war because of his personal ambition and he also suffers
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The correlations between a candidate running for election and a voter who participates in the election, in terms of support and participation, often involve the use of shared attributes to explain how said correlations have an impact on the outcome of the election. In a representative democracy such as the United States, the belief is that those who vote in elections wield the power to select government officials, who then in turn create, uphold, or interpret the law of the land accordingly. Those who participate in elections, therefore, believe that the candidate they select will make decisions or introduce legislature according to the beliefs that those who voted share with one another. A voter or a group of voters are more likely to support a candidate if they share at least one attribute with one another. In order to understand how candidate selection based on belief is accomplished, an account of how exactly comparisons between the candidate and the voter must be made to accommodate a multitude of potential attributes. Both physical attributes, such as race, and non-physical attributes, such as political ideology, can be used to compare and contrast a candidate with a voter. With this data, we can then predict the outcome between a certain attribute that a voter shares (or does not share) with a candidate and the support that candidate receives from that conglomerate.…
- 3394 Words
- 14 Pages
Powerful Essays -
First, there are two types of democracies direct and representatives. “ A direct democracy has no representatives and the citizens are involved in the day-to-day work of governing the country “. And a representative democracy is “ citizens who elect leaders to represent their rights and interest in government “. A direct democracy is different from a representative democracy because in representatives democracy the citizens hold the ultimate power, but there are no kinds of representatives, unlike a direct democracy.…
- 329 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
A system of government where members of parliament are democratically elected to create laws that reflect the values and expectations of their constituent.…
- 37517 Words
- 151 Pages
Better Essays -
In representative government the people vote for a representative to be their voice in government.…
- 451 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Dictatorship – a government controlled by one person or a small group of people who make all decisions.…
- 3272 Words
- 14 Pages
Good Essays -
She found that Personalist regimes lasted longer than military regimes but suffered collapse when faced with two situations: If leader dies or becomes quite ill that undermines repressive capacity centralised in his hands; or when a poor economy prevents the distribution of benefits and patronage to its support networks. Geddes concluded her findings by say that most stable form of authoritarian regimes were the one-party…
- 985 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
the government under majority rule. In order for a government to exist the people must…
- 725 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
3. Furthermore, some have argued that voters may not be educated enough to exercise their democratic right. A population with low intellect may not be capable of making beneficial decisions. They argue that the lack of rationality or even education is being taken advantage of by politicians, that compete more in the way of public relations and tactics, than in ideology. While arguments against democracy is often taken by advocates of democracy as an attempt to maintain or revive traditional hierarchy in order to justify autocratic rule, many extensions have been made to develop the argument further.[4] This is interesting given Lipset's 1959 essay [5]about the requirements for forming democracy, where he found that good education was present in almost all emerging democracies. However, education alone cannot sustain a democracy, though Caplan did note in 2005 that as a person's education increases, their thinking tends to be more in line with most economist…
- 988 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Citizens do not directly vote on specific issues or make ultimate decisions. Rather, the citizens will elect officials they believe represent their views well and, majority willing, that official will win. An example of this would be electing the President or members of Congress in the United States. Within that, states also elect local and state officials to represent them. The elected persons for particular positions should be aware about the problems and the popular opinions about those problems for the people they represent. This system was created as a foundation for representing the citizens of America rather than founding a direct…
- 292 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In a dictatorship you may not have the right to vote for a leader in an election. If an election is allowed there possibly will only be one party you can vote for, for instance the Communist party in China. In various countries only part of the population can vote such as men in Moslem states i.e. Kuwait. Several countries are ruled by the army i.e. Pakistan is governed by a group of generals. In Rwanda there are two tribes the Tutsi (10%) and the Hutu (90%) that refuse to work together. The Tutsi control the army and the government. The…
- 537 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The term dictatorship is defined as an autocratic form of government in which the government is rules by an individual. For some scholars, a dictatorship is a form of government that has power to govern without consent of those being governed. As is the case with democracy, there are different kinds of dictatorship. An authoritarian dictatorship is one kind whereby the power the govern is held by a small group of elite politicians. A military dictatorship is a form of government wherein the political power resides with the military.…
- 1179 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Democracy on the other hand is a rule where the needs of the people are considered over the wants of the ruler, and thus it tends to prosper far longer than dictatorship. With freedom of expression, freedom of speech and freedom of lifestyle prevailing, the citizens feel satisfied and contended with the ruler they choose. Since, it’s the people themselves that choose the best ruler; they have no face to complain when the ruler fails to meet their expectations. Alternatively, the liberties the citizens enjoy in democracy give them a platform to voice their complaints, majorly through media. Whereas in dictatorship, citizens are forced to act like puppets, with no right to criticize on the way country is being governed.…
- 1347 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
direction and chaos in the world. Some may feel that a more protected government could sustain…
- 724 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I think if people research, read the newspaper, watch the local and national news, and really know their candidate's motives, ideals and beliefs, they are well informed voters. The benefits of being a well informed voter are that you can know what could affect the nation and the local population. So that's why it is…
- 344 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
If a government is not powerful and strong, it will not have the capacity to rule its citizens and enforce the law to prevent crime. According to the United Nations World Crime Survey, countries entrenched in turmoil like Columbia and South Africa have homicide rates 63 and 51 per 100,000, respectively. Compare this to the homicide rate of the US, "5.5 homicides per 100,000 people." Countries that are in turmoil obviously do not have a strong government that can enforce the law and bring safety to its citizens. As you can see, lack of a government means that there is no law to be enforced. This puts the lives of a country's citizens in danger. However, an oppressive government will be strong enough to enforce the law and ensure the safety of its citizens, making an oppressive government more desirable than no government when it comes to assuring safety and stability.…
- 1535 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays