Preview

How democratic was Britain by 1914?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
891 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How democratic was Britain by 1914?
How democratic was Britain by 1914?

Britain was a democracy to a certain extent by 1914.

By "a democracy" we mean that there should be several certain features present. These features consist of universal adult suffrage, equal constituencies, every adult being able to stand as a candidate, a secret ballot, regular elections, a choice of political parties and freedom of speech/press. There is a debate over when exactly Britain actually became a representative liberal democracy. This essay will show that by 1914 Britain was not yet fully a democracy, but well on its way.

One factor that helped Britain on its road towards democracy was the large extension of the franchise. The Second Reform Act in 1867 meant the electorate was marginally increased to 2.5 million and one in three males now had the vote. This was mainly the skilled working class and included householders with one years residence. The Third Reform Act in 1884 further extended the franchise to all male householders, which now increased the electorate to 5 million, two in three men in England and Wales. "The Act left some 40% of adult males in the United Kingdom unenfranchised in 1911, clearly concentrated in the poor and younger working class". This is quoted from TC Smout taken from "A Century of the Scottish People 1830 - 1950." So although by 1914 Britain was more democratic due to the large extension of the franchise it still wasn 't fully democratic due to a majority of the poor and working class still being unenfranchised. There was also the issue of women still not having the vote to be addressed.

Another step towards democracy was the equalising of constituencies. In 1867 the seats were increased in industrial areas, along with a number of constituencies being defranchised. There was also great redistribution. The 1885 Redistribution of Seats Act also ended separate county/borough seats and made constituencies approximately equal. The number of MP 's was increased from 652 to 670. Equalising

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Regarding household suffrage, and the conservative victory in the 1874 electing, Source 8 comments that Disraeli “encouraged” the idea that this had been his objective “all along”, strongly implying that in the aftermath of success he was scrabbling to take credit for the election win, desperate for the favoured reputation it would bring him amongst the new working class majority. However, as source 7 is dated prior to the passing of the bill, we know that increasing the popularity of the Conservative Party within the boroughs had been on his mind well before the passing of the bill, even if it was not his primary motivation in supporting the bill.…

    • 544 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the period 1896 – 1915, the condition of Italy was relatively in a terrible state in many ways with various political, economic and social problems that hindered the country’s progress. Italy’s Liberal Governments during this period were generally very unsuccessful in dealing with these inherited and growing problems clearly contributing to the end of Liberalism in Italy. More so, the Liberal Government under the rule of Giolitti saw Italy progressing in some circumstances regarding the socio-economic concerns. Nonetheless, it is very comprehensible that the Liberal Governments lacked solving the problems that they faced.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being that England was a traditionally more liberal and reform-minded country, it had some of the best success in creating a substantial shift in government policies to become more caring (specifically within Parliament). Those of the London Workingmen’s Association petitioned the English Parliament in 1838 for increased male suffrage (Doc 4) among other electoral reforms. They did, in fact, find success with the passage of the “Great Reform Act,” which was a law that guaranteed male suffrage, a more fair distribution of the electorate, and the requirement that members of Parliament needed to own property. Of course, the chartists of Doc. 4 were very one-sided in their petition and failed to see that the passage of the Charter would practically allow those exact workers to obtain high seats in government. Nevertheless, the reforms did improve the overall livelihood of the British masses enough to allow John Stuart Mill to assert that “the general tendency [of…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the years progressed from 1815-1840 the voter participation was increasing drastically. As seen in document A, in 1824 there was a 26.9 percent of voter participation which tripled in a matter of 16 years. After the controversial “corrupt bargain” of 1824, voters were determined to have their voices heard in order to bring who they truly wanted into power. In addition to the rise of participation, the percentage of state allowing the common voters themselves to chose presidential electors climbed to almost 100%. Andrew Jackson assisted the increase of voters, he removed the requirements and opened up the voting pool to more common folk; this gave the common people more power equal to that of the aristocracy.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Reform of the electoral system finally arrived with the 1832 Reform Act, which increased the proportion of eligible voters in England and Wales to 18 per cent of the adult-male population and 12 per cent in Scotland. Although the working classes had high hopes for the Reform Act, they eventually felt betrayed as despite the new legislation, the poor ultimately remained voiceless in the way their country was run. In the years following the Reform Act, the Chartists would begin to plan their campaign to try to effect real electoral change in Britain.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the 1867 reform act was passed it gave the vote to every male householder living in a borough constituency, the working class men in the towns. Even though is increased the amount of individuals able to vote in Britain it was still very restricted as it was explained that the vote was only passed to men that owned a property over the value of £10 a year. This did double the amount of men able to vote although women still had no right to vote for their country. The 1884 reform act extended the vote to the working class people in the countryside; this managed to increase the electorate by 50%. However the undemocratic feature of this which still remained was that men who owned a property in a different constituency although they could also vote in…

    • 1328 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Germany was not democratic at all as they made they`re citizens believe that they were. Germany had tied to be democratic to show on the surface that they gave the people freedom to vote for who they wanted to. In this essay I will explain my point of view on this essay and what other people might believe and think in response to my opinions.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Women were not treated as equals with men before the second half of the eighteenth century. They had to marry, obey their husbands and have children, only receiving little education. In the eyes of the law they had little power and men were their superiors. For example, once they were married, everything they owned belonged to their husband, this meant that if they separated the women would be left with nothing, not even her children, as they too, belonged solely to the husband.
Around 1850, the rights of women started to change, as laws were made to improve women's education and rights in marriage. However women were still not allowed to vote in the general elections. Many women considered this as a huge prejudice, and that they would have to carry on being second-class citizens until they received the right to vote because a lot of women thought that having a say in general elections would give them more opportunities and rights.
Before 1918, only men had the vote, even though they had to qualify by meeting the property qualification (which was someone who earned 40 shillings a year and was a freeholder). Therefore, not all men did qualify, but many women did qualify, and as a result could vote in local elections.
As I mentioned above, people had to meet the property qualification in order to vote. Many women did own property of the right value, and so were entitled to the vote. The Married Women's Property Act made even more women qualify, as they could keep their earnings.
Women had to endure the same laws as men and also had to pay taxes, like men. So, the women only saw it fair to be able to vote, which gave women a say in what the laws and taxes were.
One of the arguments used against women's suffrage was that they were considered physically and mentally too weak. Women's argument towards that was that women had become successful monarchs of this country, for example, Queen Elizabeth I and the present Queen of the time, Queen Victoria. If women were suitable…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Up until 1832 the right to vote had split the country. Only male members of the aristocracy, and land or property owners had the right to vote, making up 3% of the population. By 1867 voting rights were extended to those men who rented property rather than owning it dramatically increasing the size of the electorate. The middle classes were on a mission as they entered the political arena coming with demands of civil and religious liberties. The rising middle class saw themselves as pioneers for change, and believed in a society based of merit and nor on birthright.…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This leniency started with the drafting of the Carter of Liberties. Foner states “the charter required that elections be held every three years among male property owners and the freemen of New York City; it also reaffirmed traditional English rights” (Foner, p. 93). The English liberties that were establish allowed more individuals to vote, and gave some power back to the lower class colonist. Forer states “it is estimated that between 50 and 80 precent of adult white men could vote in eighteenth century America” (Foner, p. 150). More of the lower class having the availability to vote make the statement that the upper class had more power in government less persuasive. This is because the lower class had more power of choosing who would control the power of their respective…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a democracy, people choose their leaders by voting, and everyone is treated equally. Democracy revolves around rule by the majority. In my opinion, colonial America was on its way to democracy, but far from being a true democratic society. Only a small portion of the people were able to make the decisions, so government did not revolve around the majority.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democracy

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The unequal and unjust property qualifications for voting had been abolished during the Jacksonian Revolution. Voting was now based on universal white manhood suffrage. Though there are still flaws in this system, leaving out women and blacks in the voting process, it was still a large contribution for democracy. The people were even choosing the Electoral College during this movement toward political equality. A more democratic way of voting was introduced through the National Nominating Convention. The convention consisted of a larger participation in presidential nomination. With the considerable amount of voting powers vested within the common people, America was becoming even more…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Robert A. Dahl, there are certain criteria that a government must meet for it to be called a democracy. Democracy must provide first of all, opportunities for effective participation, where all members of an association concerned with a certain policy ‘must have equal and effective opportunities for making their views known to the other members as to what the policy should be’ (Dahl R.A.: 2000). A second criterion is equality in voting, whereby ‘every member must have an equal and effective opportunity to vote, and all votes must be counted as equal’, followed by gaining enlightened understanding, meaning that each member must have the opportunity to learn about alternative solutions and policies. The last two criteria are the opportunities of exercising control over the agenda (the opportunity for the members to decide ‘how and, if they choose, what matters are to be placed on the agenda’ (Dahl R.A.: 2000) and the inclusion of adults, who should have the full citizen rights implied by the first four criteria.…

    • 2185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Colonial Democracy?

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the colonies, not everyone was allowed to vote this was certainly not democratic, but the criteria to be able to vote weren't very extensive. The only real requirement was the owning of land. This today we might see as a hard thing to obtain. In those days land was very cheap. To make it even easier to obtain, laborers were paid well. This gave immigrants the ability to earn enough money to buy land in a short time, and farm it on their own. This also is the reason labor was in high demand, so many of the labors bought their own land and moved off to it. Labor was in short supply for this reason, and thus laborers were paid well. More than ninety percent of the people were farmers, most of who owned their own land. All these people would be able to vote.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What is Politics?

    • 2578 Words
    • 11 Pages

    One aspect of politics is to do with democracy; democracy is characterised as ‘’a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives’’ 2 according to the oxford dictionary. This can be interpreted as democracy being a way a country is governed from members of the country participating in a form of election. They can also directly get their view across or through elected representatives who shares the same passion; this also means that the public can have a fair say in how things are controlled. Additionally democracy allows citizens of the country to manipulate and develop theories and laws in which they play a prodigious role in as the adjustment can affect their lives. Democracy was ambiguously always present within the past therefore there is a define appearance of it. However in 1832 the Reform Act suggests ‘Democracy of sorts had existed in England for centuries - as far back as 1432, Henry VI passed statues declaring who was eligible to vote’’3 This indicates democracy has been visible throughout the years never the less it has always been there to allow a…

    • 2578 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays