Preview

Deontology Vs Teleology Theory

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
235 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Deontology Vs Teleology Theory
According to Dickens and Cook (2015) the right to refuse treatment goes hand in hand with the patient right to informed consent. I personally believe that if a patient is in the right mind to make medical decision for themselves that their rights should be respected. This should only be honored after the medical provider on the treatment team has provided sufficient information about their diagnosis and all possible treatment options available in terms that they can understand.
The use of deontology and teleology theories cannot solve this issue. I say this because the theory of deontology is known as the thinking of whether an action is right or wrong verse teleology as the ideal of having a moral obligation to achieve positive outcome in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hhi135 Unit 4 Assignment

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A patient has the right to physical privacy and the right to the Healthcare provider to maintain confidentiality of patient information. The patient’s right to physical privacy is the right to be left alone. If they are competent they have the right to say they do not want to be examined; however then the physician or medical facility has the right to tell the patient to leave if they do not want to be examined or treated. In addition weather the patient is competent or not medical staff needs to respect the patient’s right to privacy; by keeping the patient information confidential by not releasing information to press, family and friends who are not…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With that said, he could request a transfer to a different institution, or refuse examination, treatment, or the combination of both. If he does refuse treatment, the physician must inform him or the person on his behalf of the risks and benefits associated with the accessible examination or treatment. The physician must then describe the examination or treatment that was declined in the medical record, secure the rejection in writing, and have the patient sign the document confirming he has chosen to refuse services despite being informed of the risks and benefits involved (FAQS). If our patient does not reject an examination or treatment, yet fails to receive the emergency care he needs, one may argue it is that patient’s duty to report the hospital that refused to provide the care in order to prevent future…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    unit 4 project

    • 572 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. Does the patient in this case have a right to refuse treatment? Why or why not?…

    • 572 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Schwartz there are a few restrictions placed on our autonomous decision making when it comes to healthcare treatments. Often the physicians respect our autonomy, but can deny treatment to us if our values are not in-line with the physician values, and within the realm of medicine, therefore, we cannot ask for treatment that isn’t in the practice of medicine. “Patients are not entitled to be treated with nonmedical practices, or scientifically futile treatment, or treatments that are in-line with the scope of medicine” (105).…

    • 818 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 4 Assignment

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. Does the patient in this case have a right to refuse treatment? Why or why not? Yes the patient in this case have a right to refuse treatment because he has the choice to make the decision himself and on top of that he does not believe in modern day cancer treatments.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHIL Case Study 1

    • 1463 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As the following will demonstrate, both parties can build valid arguments within proper ethical boundaries. On the one hand, patients deemed competent can see the imposition of treatment as an affront to their dignity and rights, while doctors can challenge competence and argue that imposing treatment brings about greater benefits. With every particular ethical consideration taken into account, one sees that the patient’s needs somewhat trumps the doctor’s position and that some form of compromise must be reached to maximize the good that comes from the final treatment decision.…

    • 1463 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nail Tech

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If any contra-indications are found But medical permission cannot be obtained, clients must sign an informed consent form stating that the treatment and its affects have been fully explained to them and confirm that they are willing to proceed without permission from their GP.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Informed refusal is an important concept just like the informed consent. When a patient refuses treatment or does not give consent, physicians should not proceed with the proposed treatment or procedure as this could be considered, legally, as battery…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arising conflicts should be resolved as quickly as possible in a most satisfactory matter for both sides. The Human Rights Acts states that every person has the right to decide about own life, they can refuse the treatments and medication they recieve. It is essential to explain why they need that particular care and make them aware of pros and cons.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: 1. American Medical Association. (1984). Opinion 2.20 – Withholding or Withdrawing Life- Sustaining Medical Treatment. Retrieved from: www.ama.assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion220.page?…

    • 1437 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Conflicting ethical principles in the health care setting exist when a competent adult patient is refusing treatment that the health care team believed will save the patient’s life. The basic ethical principles of patient’s autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice supersede the ethical principles of beneficence, and nonmaleficence of the health care team. Under the common law, every individual has the…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medical Law and Ethics

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Patients have the right to choose a physician; although some managed care plans may limit choices. Patients also have the right to terminate a physician’s services if they wish.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has always been said by physicians to do no harm to a patient. Also patients have certain rights of treatment and care. Patients have a right to refuse treatment at anytime during the duration of their stay at any hospital. Also patients have a say in what treatment they should have. As long as you are able to make sound decisions, you have the right to refuse any test or treatment, even if it means you might have a bad health outcome as a result (American Cancer Society (2011), Patient Bill of Rights). This bears to question is this ethical and moral to the doctor and patient? There are five potential ‘last resort’ interventions are available under these circumstances are accelerating opioids for pain; stopping potentially life-prolonging therapies; voluntarily stopping eating and drinking; palliative sedation (potentially to unconsciousness); and physician-assisted death (Quill (2012), Physician Should “Assist in Suicide” When It Is Important). I believe exploring these common practices in ‘last resort’ intervention in care will help us see if it is moral or ethical.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Feeding Tube

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    All patient’s in the United States have all been equal to one right. The Patient’s Bill of Rights apply to this situation because an individual has the right to make their own decisions as long as they have the right mind and is fully competent. The Patient Bill of Rights is simply a statement that entitles the patient to medical care. A statement that articulates the rights in which the doctors and hospitals ought to provide patients, thereby providing information, offering fair treatment, and granting them autonomy over medical decisions. There are six values that are commonly applied to medical ethics (Showalter, 2010). The Bill of Rights include: the right to exercise the freedom of speech, to practice religion, be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures, bear arms in an organized militia, demand a jury trial, to be protected against self- incrimination and be accordance substantive and procedural due process of the law. This also applies to June because she has the right to choose her own path in life. In this case, June is suffering from a dangerous disease.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This theory decides where the goodness is in our consequences (280). This viewpoint contemplates the potential advantage or disadvantage that comes with the consequences. Humans decide whether the ends justify the means. Therefore, when weighing the consequences with the reason why one did something it's an example of the teleological theory. According to the deontological theory, morality is the act of carrying out obligations, it has nothing to do with the consequences. Through this outlook, maintaining a law or rule is something one must do to be morally right (281). The morality of a rule is impartial to whatever advantage it gave, it's decided by whether the rule was obeyed. For example, a man robs a bank and harms several people in the process to fund their child's life-saving operation. From the deontological stance, this action is morally wrong. Breaking into a bank is a federal offense also, harming and stealing from others is breaking two moral rules. Since this person broke the federal law and broke moral rules they are in the wrong, no matter how someone else benefits from this. The nobility of an action does not matter, only if an absolute moral rule was disobeyed…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays