Preview

Derek Muller's 'Climate Change Is Boring'

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
572 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Derek Muller's 'Climate Change Is Boring'
Climate Change is Boring
By Derek Muller

(August 29, 2014) Climate change is boring. Don’t get me wrong, it’s incredibly important, it’s just that the story of climate change is not especially compelling. When I started making this article, I thought that everyone knew the story, but apparently I was wrong. Most say that the hole in the ozone layer is the one to blame on why we’re experiencing climate change. To recap, we’re burning fossil fuels, releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere which traps slightly more thermal energy causing the overall temperature of the planet to rise. Some even say that recycling is able to cancel a big percentage of the harm that we’re causing to our planet. Ok again, recycling is very important but it’s not really going to reduce green-house gas emissions which come mainly from energy use and transportation.
…show more content…
Here’s the thing, the vast majority of climate scientist agree that climate change is happening and that humans are playing a significant role. But the public doesn’t see this broad consensus because, well, there are arguments baited to the contrary by businesses with vested interest. Those who stand to lose when a price is put on carbon. Now these people will make up stories whatever they want such as Al gore and his pals just invented Climate change in order to make themselves rich and famous. Meanwhile the scientists respond with carefully worded predictions. This is why the scientists is having such a tough time informing the public about climate change. It’s much easier to tell a compelling story if you can make up whatever you want than if you have to stick to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Slide 1 – ‘Mahtab’s Story’ is an eventful novel, full of powerful and demanding moments. Throughout this novel Mahtab learns new responsibilities and takes control and learns how to grow up in her dark and complicated story. Slide 2 – ‘Mahtabs Story’ told in third person, has the author Libby Gleeson telling the story from an outside perspective by letting the audience know from ‘Mahtab ached.’ The novel is through Mahtabs eyes even though the story isn’t true; this presents Mahtab as a fictional character. Having a limited perspective of the story helps us identify Mahtab as a more naïve teenage girl and gives a more in-depth description of her and lets the audience see things from her perspective.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Al Gore is a politician and environmentalist that gave his speech “Climate Emergency” at Yale School of Forestry in 2004. He also presented it during the presidential campaign that same year. He argues that the Earth’s environment is in fact vulnerable, and that humans have a big impact on it. In his speech he uses scientific facts, statistics, maps, and graphs to demonstrate. Gore explains why he used the title “Climate Emergency”, “it is intended to convey what it conveys- that this is a crisis with an unusual sense of urgency attached to it, and we should see it as an emergency. The fact that we don’t, or that most people don’t is part of what I want to cover here” (Gore, 861)…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In March of 1992, Dr. Richard Sanford wrote an outspoken paper opposing the claims of the global warming hysteria of recent time. Sanford discusses how people accept global warming theories as scientific fact without questioning their validity. I can honestly say that I was one of these people who agreed with the media's interpretation of these theories. After reviewing the pro global warming material in the course text, Environmental Science, written by G. Tyler Miller, and reading several articles on the opposition of global warming, I find myself becoming not a hardcore skeptic, but someone that will no longer take information at face value without reviewing as many of the particulars as possible.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consumers have also begun to recycle more frequently which benefits the planet because its resources are not being consumed at a much higher rate. By recycling simple everyday items, such as glass or plastic, resources can be replenished. The cost of recycling is very economical because everyone profits from it. Landfills are filled with some materials that are not biodegradable and recycling these items reduces not only the amount of waste in the landfills, but also keeps energy consumption and pollution down. For example, recycling the newspaper or any type of paper will prevent…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doug Bandow in “Recycling is Wasteful” claims recycling does not help the environment and is too costly to fund. He gives evidence and reasoning to explain why recycling is more harmful than we think. The authors sub claims are: recycling creates more pollution, resources are not scarce, an easier way of handling garbage, and lastly, recycling costs too much money.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Global Warming is an issue demanding of world wide attention, yet widely ignored. Global Warming will change our planet drastically yet under the benefit of cheap energy we do nothing to shrink our carbon footprints. Many ignore the topic of Climate Change as they don’t believe in it, or simply don't understand why they should bother. This is exactly what Michael Pollan trys to argue in his article, “Why Bother?”, published by The New York Times,…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Recycling is an important way to keep our environment safe and clean for the children of the future. GOOD!!!…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    What exactly is global warming? Do you know the answer, maybe you do, however, taking a pretty good educated guess I would tend to think that most people think they have a pretty good idea when in actuality they have no clue what so ever about global warming. The current frenzy over global warming has galvanized the public and cost taxpayers billions of dollars in federal expenditures for climate research. It has spawned Hollywood blockbusters and inspired major political movements. It has given a higher calling to celebrities and built a lucrative industry for eager scientists. In short, ending climate change has become a national crusade. And yet, despite this dominant and sprawling campaign, the facts behind global warming remain as confounding as ever. Let’ s start by talking about the definition; according to Sir David King and Gabrielle Walker’ s, 2008, book titled “The Hot Topic “ global warming is defined as a gradual increase in the earth’s surface temperature. A more popular usage definition would be global warming is caused by human activity, or let’s look at a more technical term anthropogenic. The debate would be is global warming observed naturally or is it man made? Some might actually take on a debate about the natural causes, like is the sun getting hotter; or maybe the debate would lean more towards human causes, carbon dioxide , here is a good example: the exhaust from cars and power plants that pollute our air. Which side of the debate would you take? One in respect to thinking that global warming is a serious problem, then again maybe global warming has only clouded the issue or in simple terms; how the climate system really works and why man’s role in global warming is more myth than science, and how the global warming hype has corrupted Washington and the scientific community.…

    • 2816 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recycling can make a huge difference in our environment. There are many instances where we can see the positive effect recycling has had on our earth. Recycling is not a new concept. We have seen an…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Organization like the Petition Project are one of the many reasons for the continuing denial in the face of absolute truth. Expert consensus is crucial, as it has the power to alter public perception, which has been found as a gateway to belief, affecting other climate beliefs and attitudes including policy support. But organization like the Petition project have been largely successful in denying the existence of an expert consensus; creating the “consensus gap” Only 16% of Americans realize that the consensus is above 90%…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change” written by Naomi Oreskes is intended to let the readers understand that there is a consensus that anthropogenic global climate change is occurring. In her essay, Oreskes states that although some groups claim there is not substantial evidence that Earth’s climate is being affected by human activities, overall, the scientific community is in agreement that evidence is quite clear. “IPCC states unequivocally that the consensus of scientific opinion is that Earth’s climate is being affected by human activities,” (Oreskes 76) which further shows how scientists do, in fact, agree on climate change. The companies, on the other hand, do not agree that climate change is caused by humans because that would adversely affect their revenue and cost them more money to replace carbon dioxide emissions with something more environmentally friendly.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oreskes Climate Change

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There have been plenty of disputes regarding the infamous topic global warming, despite the fact that there is a unanimous scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change. A history professor at UCSD, Naomi Oreskes, discusses this in her article, “The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change”. She begins her investigation by researching credible experts and environmental organizations, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the National Academy of Sciences, and several others. By utilizing these various sources as evidence it strengthens her argument about the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change. In this case, Oreskes audience consists of the general public with a minimal education of high school, interested about climate change. This article is published in a standard science magazine thus the selected audience should have some background knowledge regarding global warming, otherwise it would be too complex to comprehend. She constructs three main dependent claims that convince readers in support of her main claim-that humans are affecting climate change. These three main dependent claims consist of a report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, peer reviewed scientific journals, and concrete factual evidence from various corporation supporting her claims. As a result, it has allowed her to create a more persuasive argument, by using logic based data and credible sources with contextual knowledge on climate change.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gray, R. (2012, October). Climate Scientists Are Losing The Public Debate on Global Warming. The Telegraph. Retrieved from: www.telegraph.co.uk…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the past decade now there has been a long ongoing controversy, this controversy being this issue of global climate change. It has been a subject many people have been aware of yet few have actually talked about with the general public, as a result is has become one of the most undermined, yet widely discussed issues being held today amongst primarily scientists. Although scientist heavily debate on the subject, making suggestions on what needs to be done and pointing out the causes for climate change; we as a group need to take action in finding out what is happening to the Earth. It is only educating the general public is the only way we can come closer to reversing the damaged caused by global warming and climate…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    About 97% of scientist have agreed that climate change is real: that the Earth’s atmosphere is warming at an increasing rate and that it is due to man-made pollution. However, when polled on beliefs on global warming, only about 48% of people in the United States said they believed in man-made climate change, while 31% of the public believed in climate change due to natural causes. Alternatively, 20% of Americans said they did not believe that there is any evidence for climate change at all (Funk and Kennedy). Why is there such a large gap of belief between the scientific community’s consensus and the consensus of the American people? Fossil fuel industries and companies who profit off of unrenewable energy are perpetuating climate science…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays