Preview

Dereona

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
406 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dereona
The ruling was in a 5 to 3 decision, the Supreme Court held that when two co-occupants are present and one consents to a search while the other refuses, the search is not constitutional.
California won the case because that day that he was convicted of the robbery. But also he did not contest the charges for possession of firearms and ammunitionWhether, under Georgia v. Randolph, a defendant must be personally present and objecting when police officers ask a co-tenant for consent to conduct a warrantless search or whether a defendant’s previously stated objection, while physically present, to a warrantless search is a continuing assertion of Fourth Amendment rights which cannot be overridden by a co-tenant.
Fernandez argued that, under the Supreme Court's holding in Georgia v. Randolph (2006) and the Ninth Circuit's holding in United States v. Murphy (2008), the evidence found in the search should have been suppressed. The California Court of Appeal upheld the trial court's admission of the evidence and explicitly rejected Murphy.
Clarification of Randolph is clearly warranted, as lower courts have split on the question presented. Some have held that if a tenant who objects to a search is later arrested and removed from the premises, his or her objection remains in force, and is not overridden by the consent of a still-present co-tenant. E.g., United States v. Murphy, 516 F.3d 1117, 1124-25 (9th Cir. 2008) [although the result in this case may be no more than an application of Randolph's suggestion, 547 U.S. at 121, that a pretextual arrest to remove the objecting c0-tenant could invalidate another co-tenant's consent: see United States v. Brown, 563 F.3d 410, 417 (9th Cir. 2009)]; Richardson v. City of Antioch, 722 F.Supp.2d 1133, 1140-41 (N.D. Cal. 2010); Martin v. United States, 952 A.2d 181, 187-88 (D.C. 2008); State v. Caster, 234 P.3d 1087, 1097 (Or. App. 2010). Others have held that after the objecting tenant is arrested and removed, a co-tenant’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Georgia v. Randolph is a landmark case pertaining to the search of a private resident without a search warrant where one resident gives law enforcement personnel consents to conduct a search and the other member objects. This particular case involved a married couple Scott and Janet Randolph, who were having marriage problems. Janet decided to leave Scott taking their son with her to Canada (Wood 2007 para 1). After being gone for a little over a month she and the child returned to the same residents where Scott had remained. One day shortly after her return, they got into an argument and Scott left the resident with their child in fear that she would take off again.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case Ridley v. California the Court decided on whether the searching of a smart phone of someone placed under arrest without a warrant violates the Fourth Amendment. David Ridley was arrested for possession of firearms. During the arrest an officer seized Ridley’s cell phone and searched his phone without obtaining a warrant from a judge. The officer found evidence that involves him in an earlier gang shooting and charged him in the shooting. During his trial the California Court of Appeals ruled that the search and the obtaining evidence from his cell phone was valid. He appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court in which the court decide unanimously that police need a warrant to search a suspect’s cell phone.…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Study: Mannie Vazquez

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages

    State, 753 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), the court held that Mr. Smith had no legal duty to comply with what the officer instructed him to do, and furthermore, Mr. Smith had the right to deny his consent, which he did so when he backed up. The officer violated Mr. Smith’s rights, as he had not observed any reasonable suspect that Mr. Smith participated in any illegal activity, and went ahead with the search on his own assumptions. It is important to note that the court as well, stated that the government is who needs to prove that the consent was voluntary and an act of free will, See Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491(1983). The officers in Tallahassee who searched Mannie and Vince’s car and room had no probable cause that there was illegal activity occur, the officers acted on their own assumptions that the license plate on Vazquez’s rental car was from a place of high drug…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chimel v California (1969) was a landmark case that involved Officers armed with only an arrest warrant, enter Ted Chimel’s home and arrest him for burglary. The Officers decided to search his entire house in search of the stolen coins from the burglarized coin shop. They justified their search maintaining that it was to uncover evidence but that it was incident to arrest. Chimel was convicted and his appeal reached the U.S. Supreme Court; where they overturned the ruling stating that “the search of Chimel’s residence, although incident to arrest, became invalid when it went beyond the person arrested and the area subject to that person’s “immediate control” (Schmalleger, 2014). This case gave officers the authority to conduct a protective…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In schneckloth, the argument that voluntary consent could not be valid unless the D knew that he/she had a right to refuse the request to being searched was rejected because the court believes that the gov. does not need to establish the reasonableness of effective consent. Just as it wouldn’t be practical to enforce the consent search the requirement’s details of an effective warning it would also be unreasonable for officers to always inform the people they are detaining that they are able to leave before the consent to search was…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discussion: During his appeal Rangel argued that the police’s search of his phone was unlawful because as stated in the warrant there was no particular mentioning of such devices. He also stated that that even if the warrant did authorize the taking of his phone police would need a second warrant just to be able to search the phone. The court disagreed with both of his arguments.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court defended that Atwater did not prove that any constitutional rights had been broken. The 4th amendment was the right being broken in this case. In the 4th amendment “Prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets out requirements for search warrants based on probable cause as determined by a neutral judge or magistrate.”…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Other conditions on the searches incident to arrest exception include the use of force, the search of other individuals with the arrested individual, searching the vehicle of an arrest person, contemporaneousness and inventory searches "if a government agent has probable cause to believe the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime without a warrant" because "in the time it would take to get a warrant, the car, driver and contraband or evidence could be long gone" (Harr, Hess, 2006. p. 231). The 1981 case of Robbins v. California saw the justifications for searching without a warrant. Those specifications include that the mobility of vehicles produce exigent circumstances.…

    • 310 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One does not expect to leave their house and have a stranger barge into their home and rummage through their belongings. This is the situation that Petitioner David Fallsbauer found himself in with not a stranger, but a highly esteemed officer of the law, whom unreasonably dissected his possessions. Under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, citizens are protected against the unbridled and unreasonable searches and seizures. One exception is through consent to the search. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219 (9th Cir. 1973). Petitioner David Fallsbauer can demonstrate through established case law that the consent his mother gave was ambiguous. Because his mother’s consent was ambiguous, the consent was not…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Impartial juror was “one free from the dominant influence of knowledge acquired outside of the courtroom, free from strong and deep impressions that closes the mind” – Justice John Marshall…

    • 4329 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the play of Romeo and Juliet, the characters show love in many different ways.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article from Supreme Court Debates’ May 2010 Monthly Journal details the legal definitions of discrimination and explains standards for when First Amendment rights may be overruled. By examining “Christian Legal Society v. Martinez”, it is clearly explained that extreme viewpoints and beliefs are legal, but conduct based upon these beliefs is considered discriminatory. The article then draws on critical law history, providing cases such as “United States v. O’Brian” which…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Holding: (Vote: 5-4) The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the state court. The majority agreed with Miranda in that they should have had their right to counsel and that they should have been informed of their right completely.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Degusa

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Degussa is one of the top ten chemical companies in the world (#1 in specialty chemicals) with large production facilities in over 50 countries and sales and marketing offices worldwide. In March 2005 the company committed to increase their EBIT by 2008 through four priorities: solutions to customers, site excellence, human and corporate excellence and make China happen (Source: Degussa 2008 Program). The strategic plan for China was to triple the sales from $300 to $900 million by 2008 and capture a major share of the Chinese market for specialty chemicals. One of the high growth potential areas would be the segment of stabilizers (growing at least 7-9% per year in China and Degussa owned only 10% market share of it). The company suffered from cost and lead time disadvantages due to production in Germany. It was clear that in order to increase their market share Degussa would need to either start sourcing their stabilizers locally from competitors or start their own production in China. In case of second option (FDI) the managers would also face the choice of mode of entry: greenfield, joint venture or acquisition.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Analysis

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The argument that the defendant had was that the affidavit for Room 127, when examined without the tainted information, is a “bare bones” affidavit that does not indicate “a ‘fair probability’ that evidence of a crime will be located on the premises of the proposed search. I disagree with the argument the affidavit for Room 127 contained sufficient facts and circumstances that amounted to a probability that evidence could be found in the room some of those facts included the payment of cash, the suspicious driving pattern of the Suburban, the criminal history of the renter of the room and the owner of the Suburban, the police canine's positive indication for narcotics in the Suburban, and the marijuana found on Jenkins. The police officers also told the judge of the evidence found without a search warrant in the room. That information did not alter the judges decision in any way since with all that information and the tainted evidence set aside they still had enough facts and circumstances for a search warrant and conviction of Jenkins.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays