Preview

Descartes Discourse For The Existence Of God

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
652 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes Discourse For The Existence Of God
Descartes’ Discourse on Method and Meditations Essay In Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes discusses the existence of God. Descartes believes in God and provides two arguments that support his theory. His supporting evidence is that he possess a clear idea of God and second that any cause must be at least as great as it effect. Descartes convinces the reader hat he believes in God, but not that God exist. Descartes’ argument fails to be completely convincing because he assumes all people possess the same innate ideas about God and a cause isn't always as great as its effect. Following Meditation II Descartes has established that he is a thinking thing. However, he still possess doubt as to whether or not he is being deceived. …show more content…
He argues that if his ideas “are considered only in themselves, and are not referred to any object beyond them, they cannot, properly speaking, be false.” Everything that Descartes perceives clearly and distinctly, he believes to be true because he is not referring his ideas to anything outside of his mind. Error only arises when “judging that the ideas which are in us are like or conformed to the things that are external to us.” Basically, Descartes believes mistakes happen when one attempts to compare and contrast the idea with external notions, such as already existing beliefs. This argument is flawed because though it proves that Descartes believes in God it does not confirm the existence of God. Descartes believes these ideas to be true solely because they are clear to him and posses infinite objective reality. In “Descartes on Gods Ability to Do the Logically Impossible," La Croix point outs that Descartes’ view of God is “complicated because his account of God’s omnipotence occurs exclusively in his treatment of the Cartesian doctrine that God created the eternal truths.” Descartes only proves that he possess the innate ideas of God. They do not serve a evidence to the existence of …show more content…
Descarates states that he alone could not produce the idea of God because he is “a finite being.” This implies that one’s thoughts are relatively simple, and any complex thoughts must’ve been planted in the mind by a complex being. This leads to the cause and effect argument, according to Descartes, every cause is at least as great as its effect. This argument preposes that infinite ideas must be created by an infinite being. It would be impossible for him to conceive this idea by himself. The idea had to have been produced by an infinite mind. Since Descartes already believes God to be an infinite being, he concludes that in order for the idea of God to exist, God must actually exist. One’s perception of God is “a product of the cave into which one was born.” (Baird 233) Descartes’ two arguments establish that he believes in God. He provided theories and ideas that support his belief that God exist. However, ultimately Descartes’ ignores two critical flaws in his argument that prevent readers from being persuaded. Descartes’ assumes that everyone posses the same innate idea of God and that every initial cause is produced to a divine being. Considering the Descartes’ arguments, one can conclude that Descartes’ beliefs are more rooted in faith than logic. Moreover, faith and logic do not coincide with one another. Referencing the phrase, “leap of faith," the concept

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    If he had not reached the metaphysical certainty of the self, it is likely that he would not be able to find any metaphysical certainty at all, including that of God’s existence. From this, Descartes then moves on to go about proving the existence of an omnipotent, omnibenevolent, infinite, omniscient God. Before discussing Descartes’s proof of God’s existence, it is important to first discuss ideas, substances, and their realities. According to Descartes, ideas are formed in the human mind in three ways. Ideas are either experienced or perceived in the world, they have been created or invented, or they have been derived from one’s own nature.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes believes the starting point of anything is in the thinkers mind. In his third meditation he uses the thinker’s first starting point of idea to suggest the existence of God. If they have the idea of God, then the features and attributes we have of him, he must have and therefore exist. His line of thought is evidently anti- empiricism, proven further by his statement:…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fact that Descartes is even considering the mere question of his own existence just proves that he indeed exists and that is certain. Further, he argues that we are essentially thinking things (res cogitans) that can know our minds clearly and distinctly. Descartes pitches a tent for himself firmly in the rationalist camp, as opposed to the empiricist camp. He constantly emphasizes that the clear and distinct perceptions of the intellect are the only sure means of securing knowledge, and ultimately concludes that the senses are not designed to give us knowledge at all, but are rather meant to help us move through the world in a very practical…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes casts everything into doubt in the first meditation, including God Himself. He then comes to this disproval of this theory therefore concluding that God exists. This is brought about through the causal argument.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The basis of Descartes proof that God exists is in the nature of ideas. What is the nature of ideas? To explain what they are, Descartes splits ideas into two categories. The first group of ideas is like the images of things, for example, a man, or an angel. These ideas are basic, and are not truth apt. What that means is that they are neither true nor false. For example, if I am having an idea of an angel, it doesn’t seem sensible to ask, “is that idea you are having of an angel true or false?”, because it can never be less true that I am in fact imagining the angel. The main point is that these ideas do not have a truth value. However, other ideas are capable of being true or false. For these ideas, they are connected to the outside World in a way that involves a claim. For example, if I claimed, “this ball is red”, this claim could be true or false because the ball could in fact be red, or I could be mistaken! This second group of ideas is known as judgments, and judgments are truth apt. Descartes says that to remove this possibility for falsity in judgments, ideas should be taken simply as modes of…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Descartes decided to tear down his beliefs and start fresh, he needed a foundation upon which to build his ideology. When judging what reality is, God must be considered. He/she must be taken out of a religious concept and proven to exist, exist in a way in which we cannot be deceived into only thinking is real. The proof of the existence of God in this way forms the backbone of Descartes’ further forays into proving what is reality.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes Meditation Iii

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In earlier meditations Descartes proved that he existed through the Cogito argument. Descartes must now move on to examine and explore questions about the world around him, but instead of doing this he first stop to examine the question of whether or not God exists. Descartes wants to know that he was created by an all knowing, perfect creator that is good and wants to make sure that he was not created by an evil spirit or demon. If Descartes can prove that he was created by a perfect all knowing creator then his ideas must carry some semblance of truth, because God is not a deceiver and he must of placed these ideas in Descartes. Descartes has good reasons for searching for the answer to the question of God's existence, now he has to come up with a good sound argument to prove it.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cartesian Circle

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As is usually the case when someone makes a bold and illogical statement, many have challenged Descartes’ logic. Many have claimed that his argument follows a “vicious circle,” as both premises rely on each other’s truth and validity. His argument is basically dependent on certainty of God’s existence, despite an equal amount of uncertainty regarding that existence. Descartes states that no one is definite about the existence of God, nor can they know anything clearly and distinctly until they are certain about the existence of God. Assuming that these premises are accurate, we as humans know nothing because we cannot say with certainty that God exists.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He follows this by claiming that existing is more perfect than not existing, thus God must exist. He begins his second argument for God’s existence by saying that it is an innate idea which everybody has that God is an infinite being. Next, Descartes claims that because we think of God as a being that is infinite God has infinite reality. He continues by saying that something cannot come from nothing, and that something cannot come from a thing that has less reality than itself. Descartes concludes by reasoning that because only God has infinite reality God alone could have been the cause of the idea of an infinite and perfect being, therefore God exists.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Through Descartes first three meditations he arrives at a conclusion that the only things we know with absolute certainty are, that my own thoughts and god exist. He solidifies this stance by two foundational arguments laid out in the first meditation to build off of. I find that these arguments to reach these beliefs to be flawed by Descartes own reasoning and by scientific advancements made since his time. Before I can debate these arguments I need to outline Descartes purpose and reasoning for them. Then I will present my case and justifications on why Descartes process of reaching his beliefs is unconvincing.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes says: “For just as the objective mode of being belongs to ideas by their very nature, so the formal mode of being belongs to the cause of ideas…” (28). This means that the cause of something will always have more reality than the result and that no object or thought can come from nothing because nothing has no reality. This leads Descartes to realize that there is an idea in him of a something that has all the formal reality, an object, person or thing that gives reality to everything. Descartes argues that if one of his ideas has more reality than him then it cannot come from him, then this means that his mind is not the only thing that exists. He knows that this cannot come from him because he is a finite mind, and the thing that contains all of the reality must be infinite.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Firstly, Descartes in the third meditation sets out to prove that God does indeed exist. To begin with, he considered that the source of an idea must be as real as the idea itself. He thought that since his idea of God had overwhelmingly unlimited content, then the one who caused the idea must be infinite and that it must be god, and thus asserted that what is more perfect cannot arise from what is imperfect. In his conclusion, Descartes says that God is a substance that is omnipotent, omniscient, independent and infinite. He argued that if the objective reality of an idea could not come from him, then it could have come from something else. The basis for the arguments he put forward lies in the…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By establishing the existence of God, Descartes enables himself to argue that any idea that is clear and distinct to us is innate and completely trustworthy (36). It seems that Descartes’ argument for the existence of God is a replica of his argument for his own existence: I have an idea of myself; therefore, I exist; and, I have an idea of God; therefore, God exists. One might wish to resist the argument because, as Nagel points out, the way that Descartes goes about arguing, starting from the idea of God to the existence of God, implies that the idea of perfection cannot be caused by a less-than-perfect source (36). This is what is known as the causal principle, and as Nagel mentions, it is an appeal that many readers do not find completely convincing…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes speaks about how, if everything within him comes from god, and God did not award him with a faculty for making mistakes, it would appear as if he could never go wrong. This is what is referred to as Descartes problem of error, which motivates Descartes to try and correct the two contradictory statements. Descartes first…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    His argument that God cannot create an error because he is good, and that he is source of all good, is undoubtedly a weak one. He also fails to see possibility that God may not have created everything that exists, and that evil could play a big role in it. It seems to me that all positive and good comes from God, but evil comes from us. Additionally, he is convinced that God exists because he can clearly and distinctly perceive that idea, but he can trust his clear and distinct idea because he knows that God exists. In conclusion, Descartes arguments seem very convincing at first, but after detailed analysis, it still remains unclear, which leaves problem of error…

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays