Preview

Descartes' Third Meditation: The Existence of God

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
639 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes' Third Meditation: The Existence of God
Descartes' Third Meditation
The Existence of God

Summary of First Meditation

He demolished everything he had learned, and started over again right from the foundations

Disproves one aspect of every falsehood

Tries to find a certain base of certitude for actions

Explains a theory that madmen's behaviour is a personification of dreams

States that all we know is truly a deception

Summary of Second Meditation

He questions himself, about the idea that he is a rational animal, but further realizes that he is not a rational animal and continues to question himself.

Realizes that he exists and thinks, and creates the term "Congito Ergo Sum" (I think there I am)

He questions his mind and the truth about his senses. Then, questions if God is deceiving his senses and restates that God is a "Malicious Demon."

Concludes with his Theory of Wax, which in tales that his senses were like the wax melting off the candle(there always changing), and then that his senses were like the flame(always burning and will always be there)

Summary of Third Meditation

Why he asks the question in the first place

He believed that his later judgments (in meditations 1 and 2) were open to doubt, and that some God could have deceived him on matters that were obvious.

Sees the idea that if he went wrong on the matters that he believed to be true, than it must have been a supreme being at work.

Thus he realizes from the two points above that he doesn't even know if there even is a God, and if there is one, whether he can be a deceiver or not.

Starts to prove that there is a God by using notions about "The Self"

Brings up certain ideas and thoughts, that when we are afraid or scared, we bring up an image of something that will comfort us.

Big mistake that people have in there judgments or ideas of God would be that the ideas that we have inside about God must resemble, or be confirmed by a material object.

We all have our own nature,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Unit 3 Study Pdf

    • 2711 Words
    • 12 Pages

    He asks “What am I?” and “Who am I?” He is in pain and misery.…

    • 2711 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The statement “God is omnipotent” raises more issues and complexities the any other three-word sentence, not least due to the disagreement over what omnipotent actually means. A long side this, numerous contradictions, incoherencies and philosophical problems arise, all of which lead me to conclude that man’s traditional conception of God is simply an impossibility.…

    • 2007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    to emphasize his literal belief that he will see Jesus. In paragraph eleven he becomes “ashamed”…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that he is right about asking his mother about why do they live the way that they live. He should kill people and animals in order to survive, nobody understands him, and he is very lonely. “ ’Why are we here?’ I used to ask her. ‘Why do we stand this putrid, stinking hole?’ “ (p.11) His mother is not a very smart creature. She can’t talk intelligently at all and therefore unable to guide him.…

    • 3177 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    born with a veil, and gifted with second sight in this American world, -a world…

    • 3028 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The surprise ending comes when he states that God is perfect and that his ideas were placed in him by God and that he depended on this being who is so perfect for his existence. This was realized after he reasoned that he was thinking therefore he must exist “Cogito Ergo Sum- I think therefore I am “who allowed me to think of the heavens? he reasoned to himself….there had to be someone or thing that enabled him to think, reason, and draw conclusions about his theories, that has no doubts or fears, something perfect and he summed it up in one word “God”.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By The Waters Of Babylon

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    looking around he comes upon what he thinks is a dead God. Upon viewing the visage,…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gospel Presentation

    • 1431 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ways to end suffering. He did not rule out the existence of a God or Gods, and shortly after his…

    • 1431 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He states that whether he is awake or asleep, “it remains true that two and three make five, and that a square has but four sides.” From his perspective, these truths are so evident that they could never fall under suspicion.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Belief in God

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In his groundbreaking work, Meditations on First Philosophy, the French philosopher Rene Descartes lays the groundwork for many philosophical principles by attempting to “establish a bold and lasting knowledge” (171)1. The foundations for knowledge Descartes established would go on to influence a plethora of other philosophers and philosophical works. Descartes argues in his meditations first from the point of view of complete skepticism, using skepticism as a tool in order to discover what is real. Through this method, Descartes explains the existence of man as a “thinking thing,” the capacity for human error, the overall trustworthiness of our senses, the existence of a physical world, the mind and body as separate entities, and the existence of an infinitely perfect God. Descartes uses a variety of premises to help back up his idea of a prefect God. The main idea concluded from these premises is that man alone could not have come up with the idea of infinite perfection, so the idea of God comes from God himself, thus proving his existence. Although his argument for the existence of God is the least strong of his philosophical arguments, I agree with Descartes because humans alone could not grasp the idea of infinity or an infinitely perfect being. I intend examine and defend Descartes’ explanation of the existence of God, propose valid counter-arguments and my own answers to those objections.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, he may still feel that there is a God, but that God wouldn’t be quite what he had been made out to be. Or, he may think that because God allowed to make out own decisions, that it is beyond his power to change our decisions. Although, this could be countered with the opinion that he is…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    History of God

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Throughout narration certain recurring questions have been answered in dissimilar theological and philosophical terms. Perhaps the most debated question has been whether God is to be known by reason, by faith, or by experience. Every clarification has had influential and persuasive…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Descartes’ argument for God’s existence involves a circular argument, the Cartesian circle, as he relies upon the principles of clarity and distinctness to argue for the existence of God, and then claims that God is the guarantor of his clear and distinct ideas. Descartes says that we are sure that what we clearly and distinctly perceive is true only because God exists. However, how can we be sure that God exists only because we clearly and distinctly perceive this. Before we can be sure that God exists, we need to be able to prove that whatever we perceive clearly and distinctly is true. The proof for clear and distinct perceptions does not hold. So, because we still do not have a solid reason to think that what we clearly and distinctly perceive outside of ourselves is true, we have no reason to trust our ability to reason about other things, such as God, which means we can prove without a shadow of a doubt that God is not a…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The question of God is a perennial subject of debate in the history of philosophical scholarship and can be located in nearly all the epochs of philosophy. The subject however occupies a central space in the medieval epoch that was characterized by religious thinkers. The debate is largely between two schools of thought. There are those who opine that there is no such entity as God. To such thinkers, the question of God does not amount to anything but is largely a product of human imagination. On the other hand, there are certain group of thinkers who insist that God is a reality that exist and must be given due consideration. Thus, the onus lies on the one who affirms the existence of God to explain who or what this God is and to prove his existence.…

    • 2680 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    These necessary truths incur no falsity and are clear and distinct perceptions to us. God’s existence is therefore necessary because of a clear and distinct idea of a supreme being. Not only do we acknowledge God as existent, but unlike other innate ideas, the idea of God cannot have come from our own (human) thoughts. Rather, it was planted into our minds by God himself. The logicality of Descartes’ proof of God is easy to follow and it is easy for one to understand an innate idea, but within these strengths lay the weaknesses of a priori…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays