Descartes begins his argument by affirming that the mind is an entity that senses things in the physical world. In order for the mind to perceive and sense there must be a subject and an object that is being observed. For example the eye sees a picture of a dog, the subject is the eye and the object it perceives is the dog. "I understand all that is capable of being bounded by some shape, of being enclosed in a place, and of filling up a space in such a way as to exclude any other body from it." (p19; 26). In order for the eye to see, there is an extension in space that we are able to perceive. The object to be perceived and a separate perceiver are the coexisting relationship between the object and the subject. With this said there could also be doubts of what is being sensed. Someone with distorted mental capabilities, or someone who maybe asleep would sense something different through the use of their imagination. They would not actually perceive the object through their senses, but only in their imagination. "I seemed to have sensed in my dreams many things that later realized I did not sense." (p19; 27). Descartes continues to argue that all that is perceived through sight, taste, scent, touch, and sound, are all sensations. For certainty, he continues to argue that one cannot deny that the mind and body senses and imagines. Descartes main objective is that all sensations become thoughts whether or not they are physically perceived through sight, taste, scent, touch, or sound. For example, while dreaming the body believes it senses the smell of a cake baking. Although it is not physically perceived in the world, the sensation becomes a though and makes the mind believe it is being perceived. "Therefore it is not dependent upon any of those things that I stimulate in my imagination." (p20; 28). In relation to perceiving an object, how does one go about knowing the true element or essence of something? How does someone know an object with certainty and possess no doubt of that object? Descartes tries to explore this idea of knowing something by using the five senses in examining a piece of wax. Descartes identifies that the piece of wax he is observing through his five senses occupies characteristics that he can perceive and sense. His sight tells him that the wax holds a certain shape, his scent smells some sort of flowery aroma, his touch maintains a solid and hard feel, his hearing enables some sort of vibration to emit, and his taste recognizes a honey flavor.
In an experiment to test his knowledge of objects, Descartes raises the temperature of the wax by using fire, which causes the wax to melt and take on a new form. In observing the newly formed wax, Descartes then identifies with his senses how the wax has changed. The wax now has changed color and expanded into a pool of liquid; the scent increases in the air; it is hot and wet to the touch; the pool secretes a silent sound; and the honey taste has lost flavor. All of the elements that the senses now perceive have completely changed from the original piece of wax. Not a single similar native feature has remained the same meaning that it has now been modified into a new object. "For whatever came under the senses of taste, smell, sight, touch or hearing has now changed; and yet the wax remains." (p21; 30).
Descartes main focus now is to determine whether or not the newly formed object is still the same wax. Descartes refutes that no one denies that the pool of liquid is the same as the original wax, however his new aim is to understand how does one know it is the same. According to the five senses, everything about the wax has changed. If the imagination and body only used the senses to know something, then the mind would think that the melted wax was something different. "It remains then for me to concede that I do not grasp what this wax is through the imagination; rather, I perceive it through the mind alone." (p22; 31). With this understanding, Descartes affirms that one cannot know the wax only through the senses. There is something underlying taking place to be able to determine that it is the same wax.
In analyzing the wax, Descartes wonders how he knows it to be the same body of wax when the outward characteristics have changed. So far Descartes has rejected knowing something through the senses and imagination. Therefore Descartes comes to the understanding that he knows the wax by some sort of inspection of the mind. The Inspection of the mind means that the mind judges and receives it to be the same wax. As a result all things are received according to the mode of the receiver. The mode in which we perceive is based on experience of the mind. For example, Descartes observes a few men crossing the square. His senses only perceive floating coats and hats but his mind judges them to be men. "Thus what I thought I had seen with my eyes, I actually grasped solely with the faculty of judgement, which is my mind." (p22; 32).
Although Descartes dismisses knowing something through the senses or the imagination, however these key components aid in the understanding. For example a blind man will never truly know what green or yellow ' is because he has never perceived them. The fact that he cannot see green ' or yellow ' he is unable to judge in his mind and therefore it can never be perceived based on experience.
In conclusion, Descartes provides interesting arguments in knowing something to certainty. In examining the senses, he has proved that this cannot be the only viable resource to knowing something. In understanding the imagination while dreaming, he has also proved that this method cannot be used to know something because there is nothing in the physical world or space to be perceived. Descartes ultimately determines that the mind inspects what is perceived and it in turn bases it through experience in knowing and understanding.
Works Cited
Descartes, Rene. Meditations on First Philosophy, Hackett Publishing Co, Originally published in 1641
P. 19; Section 26
P. 19; Section 27
P. 20; Section 28
P. 21; Section 30
P. 22; Section 31
P. 22; Section 32
Cited: Descartes, Rene. Meditations on First Philosophy, Hackett Publishing Co, Originally published in 1641 P. 19; Section 26 P. 19; Section 27 P. 20; Section 28 P. 21; Section 30 P. 22; Section 31 P. 22; Section 32
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Descartes’s best work is “Meditations on First Philosophy” which is where most of his investigation on the questions of knowing takes place. In meditation I Descartes accepts that he has learned throughout his life with his senses…
- 383 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
For Rene Descartes, the thinking, and thus the existence, is undeniable, absolutely true and from which one new certainties can be established, also glimpsing that the absolute of reality depends on the certainty of thoughts. Following Berkeley’s conclusions, the perceived objects are the only ones knowable. When one speaks about a real object, in fact, one speaks about the perception one has about the object; this concept is seen from the beginning of the film when Christopher Nolan manipulates audience’s perception to create confusion about the perceived reality, therefore, making the spectator doubt about the character existence inside the film. The film begins right in the middle of a…
- 742 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Descartes sets out on a mission to guarantee that every one of his beliefs is certain without any doubt. He considers that he should free himself of all false learning keeping in mind the end goal is to acquire any genuine information. Descartes chooses to question all that he has learned from truth in the past. He will depend on his thinking capacity to reconstruct his own particular knowledge, starting with a foundation of things which he is most sure about. Descartes declines to acknowledge anything that has any hint of doubt. His purpose behind doing such is because he genuinely trusts this is the best way to find the practical presence of something that cannot be questioned. Descartes uses a strategy in his endeavor to obtain information.…
- 650 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Meditator is alone, no trees, no people, no oceans, no mountains, no earth, no moon; just him and his isolation. In “Meditation Three”, Descartes goes much deeper than just his famous philosophical ideal — if “one can think one can be”(Descartes 19). He goes on to explain how there must be a God. He states that if there was not a God, people would have created themselves. If this were to be true, everyone would create themselves as perfect people. Descartes believes that there must be a God. God created humans and other humans and other objects to allow humans to think. This human ability to think allows them to exist. If nothing else were to exist and the Meditator was alone in the universe then he could not think and without thought,…
- 1030 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The fact that Descartes is even considering the mere question of his own existence just proves that he indeed exists and that is certain. Further, he argues that we are essentially thinking things (res cogitans) that can know our minds clearly and distinctly. Descartes pitches a tent for himself firmly in the rationalist camp, as opposed to the empiricist camp. He constantly emphasizes that the clear and distinct perceptions of the intellect are the only sure means of securing knowledge, and ultimately concludes that the senses are not designed to give us knowledge at all, but are rather meant to help us move through the world in a very practical…
- 894 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Descartes knows that his image of everything he knows is built on his sense experiences which make them unreliable so he must tear down everything he knows and start again with the foundations of true knowledge. Descartes realizes that he is often convinced when he is dreaming that the things he sees are real objects. An example could be that I KNOW that I am sitting at a computer writing this paper, but while I am dreaming I can dream the exact same thing and be completely convinced that is it real. After pondering this situation Descartes realizes that though the things we see in dreams are fake, they can be drawn from real objects. Even though we may dream of something completely new, Descartes concluded, we cannot doubt simple universal units and the parts they represent such as time, size, shapes, etc. This helps Descartes to discover that we cannot doubt the studies of simple things (such as geometry) but instead can doubt the studies of more collected ideas such as medicine and…
- 321 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In Descartes’ First Meditation, Descartes’ overall intention is to present the idea that our perceptions and sensations are flawed and should not be trusted entirely. His purpose is to create the greatest possible doubt of our senses. To convey this thought, Descartes has three main arguments in the First Meditation: The dream argument, the deceiving God argument, and the evil demon “or evil genius”. Descartes’ dream argument argues that there is no definite transition from a dream to reality, and since dreams are so close to reality, one can never really determine whether they are dreaming or not. To reinforce that argument, Descartes presents the deceiving God argument. He says that since God is all powerful, then he has the power to deceive us about reality or our dreams. But again, Descartes feels this argument is missing something, which is why he concludes with the evil genius argument. The evil genius argument’s purpose is to tie all these arguments together and strengthen Descartes’ entire argument. The evil genius argument goes like this: God is omnipotent and supremely good, which means God cannot be the one who deceives humans, rather, a separate entity -- an "evil genius, [who is] supremely powerful and clever, who has directed his entire effort at deceiving me" (Descartes 492). By deceiving, I mean tricking humans that their sensations and perceptions are real, when they are indeed not real. To overcome this evil genius, Descartes says he will regard all external things as “hoaxes of my dreams, with which he (the evil genius) lays snares for my credulity” (Descartes 492). In this analysis, I will further discuss Descartes’ arguments in the First Meditation, the purpose of the evil genius argument, how Descartes attempts to overcome the power of this great deceiver, and ultimately why his attempt is…
- 1451 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
"Give a detailed account of Descartes ' systematic doubt or methodical doubt in Meditation 1, making it certain that you distinguish between real doubts and so called hypothetical/metaphysical doubts. Then, explain in detail, exactly how Descartes dispels each and every one of these doubts during the course of the subsequent Meditations beginning with the cogito. Do you think that Descartes has been completely successful? Explain."The main goal of Descartes in Meditations on First Philosophy was to find truth behind all of his beliefs in order to build a solid foundation of certainty, and to focus his beliefs strictly on his idea of certainty; essentially to question knowledge. Descartes beliefs are mainly based on the theory that, if someone thinks that they really know something, they must be correct. Descartes meditations bring…
- 3392 Words
- 14 Pages
Better Essays -
What is dualism? What is the essence of the Res Cogitans? Explain in detail how Descartes discovered this essence. Explain the “piece of wax argument.” What does the “wax argument” prove? How does Descartes prove that corporeal substance exists and that the mind is separate and distinct from the body? * Do you find his argument convincing? Why or why not? Give reasons for your answer. (*Be sure to discuss, God, the distinction between types of ideas, and the distinction between the two substances.)…
- 2076 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The first doubt that Descartes highlights is that of his senses. He says that all of the information he has received has been through his senses and that sometimes his senses mislead him. Descartes is sure in his existence. To him, this is impossible to doubt and he justifies this…
- 482 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Official Doctrine: This part deals with the human body and mind, how they are interconnected but still different at the same time. He displays the physical human body to be a public affair and something that all in this world can visually see; the mind however, is a much more private and personal affair. With this belief, humans can have two parts: mind (private) and body (public), these parts play different roles as one can affect the other or completely disguise the other. Ryle states that Descartes may have uncertainties about episodes in the physical world, but does not have any uncertainties when analyzing the state of his mind. For example, say Bob’s mind is expressed, no one but Bob will be able to respond to these expressions (feelings). Changes in both of the worlds can affect one another through the physical and intellectual (mind) aspects and challenges that one may face in their lifetime.…
- 516 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
1. Descartes’ conceivability argument is that if something is conceivable. Then it is logically possible to exist and that if something is not conceivable, then it is not logically possible. Through this reasoning Descartes’ states that since it is possible to conceive that he could exist mentally without a physical form, it is therefore logically possible that one could exist without their body. Descartes’ logic, though valid in its presentation, does not provide the reasoning that perhaps, at least for some, is not possible for them to conceive of their body and mind existing as separate entities.…
- 255 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
René Descartes begins his first meditation by calling all our current beliefs to suspicion. His purpose of this practice was to stripe away all the falsehoods that we have acquired since childhood by the use of our senses. He also wanted to build anew a stable foundation of beliefs that he can be certain are of undeniably truths.…
- 507 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
With this idea in mind, Descartes’s conception of knowledge would not allow him to know anything at all because of the idea that he has been feed false information his entire life. The conclusion that Descartes comes to was…
- 1567 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Abstract The Clean Brite Company (CBC) Ltd and Scrubaway Allbrigte Ltd (SAL) are two Cleaning Product Supplier Company being to Merger into CBC. Company sale there product by Web, using e-commerce and also Tale sale by phone where customer have unable to buy product form web after merger two company looking some of problem one is distinct organizational cultures anther is the IS department do not satisfy other department and customer for that reason company decide to make a new “Home Order Processing System” to cover the all of exiting problem.…
- 765 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays