Preview

Determinants of Morality

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
441 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Determinants of Morality
CHOI, YEON JIN 2H5 September 2, 2013 A. Define the Determinants of Morality
The determinants are essential features of morality that point to the rightness or wrongness of an action. It enables us to perceive the specificity of morality. Only human person act for a reason, a purpose, and for an intention or goal because it is only the human persons who are created with the intelligence and the freedom to choose from good and evil. The three determinants of morality are the Object of the Act (Finis Operis), End of the Agent (Finis Operantis), and Circumstances
B1. What are Circumstances
Circumstances are the situational factors surrounding the concurrent of the act. These circumstances may either increase or diminish our responsibility in doing the act.
There are seven types of circumstances affecting the act that human people do. These are what, who, where, by what means, why, how, and when. “What” refers to the nature of the act (Quid). “Who” refers to the person/doer/agent and the recipient of the act (Quis). “Where” refers to the locus of the act or the place where the action took place (Ubi). “By What Means” refers to the instruments used in the performance of the act (Quidis Auxiliis). “Why” refers to the reason in doing the act (Cur). “How” refers to the manner or the process of performing the act (Quomodo). And lastly, “When” refers to the time element in the commission of the act (Quando).
There are also three kinds of circumstances. First is aggravating, which intensifies the gravity of the act. Second is mitigating, this lessens the culpability of the act. Third is exempting, it has culpability but is no applicable for the given time. Lastly justifying, which means no more culpability is involved.
B2. Principles to Remember
The principles to remember in circumstances are it is positive because it can make better an act good or even indifferent in its object and it is negative because it can make worse an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Virtue ethics, utilitarianism, and demonological ethics are the three main forms of normative ethics. The purpose of this essay is to address some similarities as well as differences between the virtue theory, utilitarianism, and demonological ethics. This essay will describe the differences between how the theories addresses ethics and morality. I will include a personal experience to explain the relationship between virtue, values, and moral concepts to one of the theories.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Causation refers to whether the defendant's conduct caused the harm or damage in a crime and it must be established in all result crimes. Causation in criminal liability is divided into factual causation and legal causation. Factual causation is the starting point and consists of applying the 'but for' test. In most cases, factual causation alone will be enough to establish causation. However, in some circumstances it will also be necessary to consider legal causation. Legal causation is when the result must be caused by a culpable act, the act of the defendant may not necessarily need to be the only cause, but must be more than minimal. Factual causation is established by applying the 'but for' test. This asks, 'but for the actions of the defendant, would the result have occurred?' If the answer is yes, the result would have occurred in any circumstance and the defendant is not liable. If no the defendant is liable as it can be said that their action was a factual cause of the result.…

    • 1719 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Comcast-Universal Merger

    • 10353 Words
    • 42 Pages

    References: Communications Act. (1934). be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. Retrieved fromhttp://www.criminalgovernment.com/docs/61StatL101/ComAct34.html…

    • 10353 Words
    • 42 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    4.1 Describe ethical dilemmas that may arise in own area of responsibility when balancing individual rights and duty of care…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics, Morality, and Integrity all have some of the same elements that defines a person character. Being trustworthy leads to other elements of integrity. Such as, helping to better the community and respecting authority as a Parole Officer shows honesty. Being fair is another element which shows integrity. How can you be a Parole Officer, but doesn`t treat everyone equally? Third, being able to take responsibility for your own actions and personal growth as a Parole Officer shows integrity, as well. If you basically blame all of your failures and lack of progress on others around you then that shows your character and you cannot exhibit integrity with others and your career if you cannot be honest to yourself. Ethics as a Parole Officer could…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Midterm BUSN120

    • 1412 Words
    • 8 Pages

    9. Which of the following ethical frameworks directs us to decide based on overall consequences of our acts?…

    • 1412 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this essay, I am going to examine the key features of Situation Ethics. Situation Ethics is a teleological theory that resolves ethical and moral issues relative to the situation and was developed at a time when society and the church were facing drastic and permanent change. It is most commonly associated with Joseph Fletcher and J.A.T Robinson and also William Barclay. Situation Ethics is also considered to be the method of ethical decision making that states that you must consider “noble love” (agapé) in decision making and that a moral decision is correct if it is the most loving thing to do. The theory is based upon this idea of agapé love which is defined by William Barclay as “unconquerable good will”.…

    • 2118 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Situation ethics is a Christian ethical theory that was principally developed in the 1960’s by a priest called Joseph Fletcher and expanded by Bishop John Robinson. It is a teleological theory, but in contrast to utilitarianism; it is based on Christian principles, and primarily the promotion of agape. The moral worth of any action is judged on its consequences, not on the action itself. The judgement is made on how much love is produced by the action.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    rules. According to Piaget there are two main factors involved in moral reasoning, firstly young children…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Central to this expansion is determining liability through a person's degree of associated knowledge and participation in a crime. In a criminal context, the principal offender is one whose acts or omissions are the most immediate cause of death. The identification of secondary parties depend on judicial interpretation of 'aid, abet, counsel and procure' . To identify these parties, a causal link must be established between them. Accessories before and after the fact are also relevant in determining liability. Defences that deny an accused's associated knowledge and participation in a crime may be employed as, generally, principals and accessories are held liable to the same degree. Such issues will be further explored when discussing complicity and inchoate offences.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    R.E Essay Situation Ethics

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of the main strengths of Situation ethics is that it is teleological meaning that an action can change depending on the situation rather than being the same every time (as teleological refers to relative morality). Teleological is concerned with the ‘telos’ – end – of an action: its consequences. Fletcher argues that the consequences are the most important feature of an action, seeing as it is what actually affects people. The action itself is deemed unimportant, as long as it brings about the most loving outcome. Fletcher given the example of Mrs.Bergermire, who deliberately becomes pregnant with a man who was not her husband in order that she could be…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paper on Situation Ethics

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Situation ethics has many strengths. One of the main strengths of situation ethics is its flexibility. It allows practical decisions to be made while other ethical systems that are based on rules follow their own absolute commandments. It takes one’s circumstances into consideration, and allows for exceptions to be made. Another strength of situation ethics is it is particular. Since moral decisions are treated on a case by case basis, the decision is always modified to certain situations. The third strength of situation ethics is it is based on doing good and being loving. Situation ethics teaches that right acts are those which are motivated by the desire to ensure the well being of others and to show them love. The fourth strength of situation ethics is that by acting out of love, you are doing the right thing and you are able to do so by putting moral laws on hold in order to achieve the greater amount of love. Despite the fact that situation ethics has many strengths, it has quite a…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality In Religion

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The definition of religion as taught to me in class is bind or to come together. There are many religions that are practiced worldwide. They have different histories, adherents, Gods, meanings of life, afterlife beliefs, practices, and books containing text that guides them through their spiritual journey. From Christianity, Hinduism, and Buddhism, to Islamism, Judaism, and Rastafarianism, etc., religion offers diverse teachings. But they all have one thing in common, keeping the tradition.…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Niccolo’ Machiavelli had their own perspectives on what was moral and immoral. King and Machiavelli view what was morality right and how they would use this judgment in government and how it affected people in everyday life. King fought a moral fight against what was described as immoral laws to oppress blacks during an era of segregation in the United States. He believes that sometime it is moral to take action against immoral laws to get the results he and others that fought alongside him desired. Machiavelli as a Ruler, during a time when his country was unstable and constant political in-fighting, believed it was better to be feared than loved, and he took the immoral action of oppression to gain respect morally from his followers as a result. Machiavelli was a believer of the art of war to gain power, while King believed power was achieved in non-violence.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    situation is the justice approach, it holds that moral decisions must be based on standards of…

    • 347 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays