Developing pragmatic competence in EDeveloping pragmatic competence in EFDeveloping pragmatic competence in EFL classroom in ChinaL classroom in ChinaFL classroom in China
Developing pragmatic competence in EFL classroom in China
1. Introduction
As the world is increasingly globalized, the exchange of commodities and ideas across the border is proceeding at an astounding rate (Pakir, 1999). Consequently, the cross-cultural communication has become more and more important. English, as an international language, is increasingly used throughout the world. In China, English even is among the core subjects at school and deserves a place in the curriculum. However, many Chinese English learners may not comprehend the utterances correctly and be able to express themselves properly in real-life communication, even though they get high scores in general proficiency test such as college entrance examination or CET 4 or 6. That is because these EFL learners lack necessary pragmatic competence. Pragmatic competence refers to “the ability to use language effectively in order to achieve a specific purpose and to understand language in context” (Thomas, 1983: 92). This problem is consistent with Bardovi-Harlig’s research finding. According to Bardovi-Harlig (1999: 686), “high levels of grammatical competence do not guarantee concomitant high levels of pragmatic competence”. Thus, it is necessary for teachers to help Chinese English learners developing their pragmatic competence in EFL classrooms.
This paper first introduces pragmatic competence. Next, it discusses the importance of and the teachability of pragmatic competence. It then analyzes the possible causes that lead to this problem. Finally, this paper explores some potential solutions for the teachers to help Chinese English learners to develop pragmatic competence in EFL classrooms.
2. Pragmatic competence
2.1 The definition of pragmatic competence
Many scholars have given their own definitions of pragmatic competence. Thomas (1983: 92) points out that the speaker’s “linguistic competence” consists of grammatical competence and pragmatic competence. “Pragmatic competence” refers to “the
1. Introduction
As the world is increasingly globalized, the exchange of commodities and ideas across the border is proceeding at an astounding rate (Pakir, 1999). Consequently, the cross-cultural communication has become more and more important. English, as an international language, is increasingly used throughout the world. In China, English even is among the core subjects at school and deserves a place in the curriculum. However, many Chinese English learners may not comprehend the utterances correctly and be able to express themselves properly in real-life communication, even though they get high scores in general proficiency test such as college entrance examination or CET 4 or 6. That is because these EFL learners lack necessary pragmatic competence. Pragmatic competence refers to “the ability to use language effectively in order to achieve a specific purpose and to understand language in context” (Thomas, 1983: 92). This problem is consistent with Bardovi-Harlig’s research finding. According to Bardovi-Harlig (1999: 686), “high levels of grammatical competence do not guarantee concomitant high levels of pragmatic competence”. Thus, it is necessary for teachers to help Chinese English learners developing their pragmatic competence in EFL classrooms.
This paper first introduces pragmatic competence. Next, it discusses the importance of and the teachability of pragmatic competence. It then analyzes the possible causes that lead to this problem. Finally, this paper explores some potential solutions for the teachers to help Chinese English learners to develop pragmatic competence in EFL classrooms.
2. Pragmatic competence
2.1 The definition of pragmatic competence
Many scholars have given their own definitions of pragmatic competence. Thomas (1983: 92) points out that the speaker’s “linguistic competence” consists of grammatical competence and pragmatic competence. “Pragmatic competence” refers to “the
References: Austin, J. L. (1962) How to do things with words : The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999) Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics. Language Learning. 49 (4): 677–713. Bachman, L. F. (1990) Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford Press. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1996) Pragmatics and language teaching: Bringing pragmatics and pedagogy together. In Bouton, L. F. Pragmatics and language learning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, pp. 21-39. Bardovi-Harlig, K., and Griffin, R. (2005) L2 pragmatic awareness: Evidence from the ESL classroom. System, 33(3), pp.401-415. Brown, H. D. (1994) Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. 3rd, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents. Candlin, C. N. (1976) Communicative language teaching and the debt to pragmatics. In Rameh, C. (ed.) 27th Round Table Meeting. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. pp. 237-256. Canale, M. (1983) From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In Richards, J, C. and Schmidt, R, W. (eds.) Language and Communication. London: Longman. Chomsky, N. (1980) Rules and representations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Edwards, M. and Csizér, K. (2004) Developing pragmatic competence in the EFL classroom. English Teaching Forum. 42(3), pp.16-21. Faerch, C. &. Kasper, G. (1986) The role of comprehension in second-language learning. Applied Linguistics, 7, pp. 257-274. Hu, Z. (2014) Study on Developing Chinese College EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Competence in Relation to Language Proficiency and Overseas Experience. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 5(2), pp. 391-398 Ji, P Kasper, G. (1997a) Can pragmatic competence be taught? [online]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center. Available from:www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/Net-Works/NW06/ [Accessed 26 August 2014] Kasper, G Leech, G. N. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman. Lei, N. (2012) Developing pragmatic competence in Chinese EFL classroom. Overseas English, pp. 20-24. Pakir, A. (1999) Connecting with English in the context of internationalization. TESOL Quarterly, 33 (1), pp. 103-114. Richards, J Rinte, D. E. (1979) Getting your speech act together: the pragmatic ability of second language learners. Working Papers in Bilingualism 17(3): pp.97-106. Savignon, R. and Wang (2003) Communicative language teaching in EFL contexts: Learner attitudes and perceptions. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41(3), pp.223-249. Schmidt, R. W. and Richards, J. C. (1980) Speech acts and second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 2(1), pp.129-157. Shen, Q.Y. (2013) The Contributing Factors of Pragmatic Failure in China’s ELT Classrooms. English Language Teaching. 6(6), pp.132-136. Thomas, J. (1983) Cross-cultural Pragmatic Failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), pp. 91-112.